User talk:Jingofetts

Welcome!

Hello Jingofetts, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! KillerChihuahua^?!? 15:57, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

thanks! --Jingofetts 15:57, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion per WP:STYLE

Please do read the links in the welcome message. Based on your edit history, I suggest you begin with Wikipedia:Make_only_links_relevant_to_the_context#What_should_not_be_linked. KillerChihuahua^?!? 16:21, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Portals

Hi. There is a great interface at Portal:Browse for finding different portals. I know there is one for sports on there, but I don't think I've seen a Narnia portal. --CBD _☎ ^✉ 19:41, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

User page

Hey, Jingofetts. I've just noticed you updated your user page, and although it is entirely your decision what to put on it, perhaps you would like to consult some other user pages to get an idea of what is generally used by looking around in talk pages and clicking on a user's name. Please don't hesitate to ask me any questions by leaving me a message on my talk page (I've put a link in my signature - the little T icon)! JHMM13 (T | C) 20:35, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Welcome to Wikipedia! I notice that you have a lot of the same interests as Maoririder. Have you met him? (ESkog)^(Talk) 19:24, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I can help you. I'm trying to look over your edits right now. If there's something specific you'd like help with let me know. (ESkog)^(Talk) 19:27, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks and to ike I will use less tags. Thanks. --Jingofetts 19:27, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Looking better

Your articles are all looking better and you seem to be getting the hang of wikifying pages. I still think you need to do a better job of using tags selectively. As we discussed before, one tag goes a long way, and usually if I see a "wikify" tag I'll also cleanup and look to expand if possible. Same for other tags. Also, remember that {{reqimage}} only goes on talk pages - we don't need to advertise to our readers that something is missing! (ESkog)^(Talk) 19:39, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

That you, Maori? - Lucky 6.9 21:43, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Lucky! Good to see you pal. I guess happy holidays! I'am better now cheers! write back ASAP!

Lucky sorry to tell you but i lost my password for Mao so i love jingo so hey i got it and now i'am better at wikipedia and that statement about the legal threats forget it sorry.

Glad to see you're back with us Maorider! Hope you had a great holiday and will have a great New Year! Remember to read Wikipedia:Your first article when you have some time - it's really helpful (I just read through it again today myself) and pretty short. Keep up your good work! Thanks! Flcelloguy (A note?) 01:11, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

What are you doing?

What are you doing? Are you placing AfD tags on your own articles and then writing justifications for their existence? Please don't do that. If you continue to misuse AfD pages like this, or blanking other people's AfD's, you'll be blocked for vandalism. --Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 17:05, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Pablo listen bud Maoririder is the king.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Jingofetts (talk • contribs) 17:05, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Mentorship.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Jingofetts (talk • contribs) 17:06, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You might want to read Wikipedia:Deletion_policy#Commenting on a listing for deletion it goes over some guideline on how to comment so that we can keep the discusion fairly neat and orderly and so that people know at a glance what your opinion is. --Pboyd04 17:11, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You are creating articles Surf&Turf with misleading tags and disregarding policies and the messages like above. I'm not specially patient when it comes to purposeful disruption. You'll be blocked if you do the same again. --Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 17:19, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Pablo calm down. okay man dont threaten me.

Block

Template:Vbc-t

You can't use policy against me. Your edit summaries mocking me are visible to all. You were warned sufficiently. Take advantage of the block to relax and to spend a Happy New Year in Real Life. --Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 17:25, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Or perhaps to read the information found by following the links in your welcome message, above. KillerChihuahua^?!? 17:32, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Jingofetts (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please provide a reason as to why you should be unblocked.
Change {{unblock}} to {{unblock | reason=your reason here ~~~~}}

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=original unblock reason |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=original unblock reason |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=original unblock reason |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

due to me being a previous "friendly" user. jin.