Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/20 Years: The Evolution of Mariah Carey

20 Years: The Evolution of Mariah Carey

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Highly suspicious article with no sources. There are only 10 google hits for this album and apparently all of them took the info from Wikipedia. Uploader has a history of uploading unsourced info and album covers that are likely to be fake (never appeared on any sites before, stylistically different from all other Mariah album covers and some of them look amateurish). Uploader is either an insider at the label or has a crystal ball :) – Alensha ^talk 23:26, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:54, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. WP:CRYSTAL or WP:HOAX...whichever the case, there appear to be no sources to confirm this alleged album, release date, or track listing. Gongshow ^Talk 23:55, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Per WP:CRYSTAL or WP:HOAX. Joe Chill (talk) 01:49, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: There are absolutely NO sources on this page. Even fan sites still don't know it's content, release date or label. The whole page is pure fancruft and should be speedily deleted.--Petergriffin9901 (talk) 06:45, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete : Could not find a single source anywhere claiming this album even exists other than this article and sites taking the info straight from this article. Looks like a hoax. SteveJ2006 (talk) 03:33, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. hoax-y. SKS (talk) 06:53, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - some key issues with this article, any of which would be grounds for deletion in my book. The first: WP:CRYSTAL - not enough sources to verify the information (first 3 currently in the article are blogs from Blogspot/Wordpress, nothing reliable). The second: WP:HOAX - considering how noteworthy an artist Mariah Carey is, it would stand to reason that there would be more/better sources available for this; if there aren't, then it's probably a hoax, or there hasn't been any official confirmation, etc. (in that case, see point one). Cocytus [»talk«] 01:23, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: No reliable source at all about this project. BratBoyz (talk) 07:04, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]