Jump to content

Scaling pattern of occupancy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Canghui (talk | contribs) at 17:19, 12 January 2010. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Definition

Scaling pattern of occupancy (SPO, hereafter), also known as the area-of-occupancy, is a term in spatial ecology and macroecology, and decribes how species distribution changes across spatial scales. In physical geography and image analysis, it is similar to the Modifiable areal unit problem. Simon A. Levin (1992)[1] states that the problem of relating phenomena across scales is the central problem in biology and in all of science. Understanding the SPO is thus one central theme in ecology.

Pattern description

This pattern is often plotted as log-transformed grain (cell size) versus log-transformed occupancy. Kunin (1998)[2] presented a log-log linear SPO and suggesting a fractal nature of species distribution. In reality, it has been shown to follow a logistic shape, reflecting a percolation process. Furthermore, the SPO is closely related to the intraspecific occupancy-abundance relationship. For instance, if individuals are randomly distributed in space, the number of individuals in an α-size cell follows a Poisson distribution, with the occupancy being Pα=1-Exp(-μ•α), where μ is the density[3]. Clearly, Pα in this Poisson model for randomly distributed individuals is also the SPO. Other probability distributions, such as the negative binomial distribution, can also be applied for describing the SPO and the occupancy-abundance relationship for non-randomly distributed individuals[4]. Other occupancy-abundance models that can be used to describe the SPO includes Nachman's exponential model[5], Hanski and Gyllenberg's metapopulation model[6], He and Gaston's[7] improved negative binomial model by applying Taylor's power law between the mean and variance of species distribution[8], and Hui and McGeoch's droopy-tail percolation model[9].

One important application of the SPO in ecology is to estimate species abundance based on presence-absence data, or occupancy alone[10]. This is appealing because obtaining presence-absence data is often cost-efficient. Using an dipswitch test consisting of 5 subtests and 15 criteria, Hui et al.[11] confirmed that using the SPO is a robust and reliable for assemblage-scale regional abundance estimation. The other application of SPOs includes trends identification in populations, which is extremely valuable for biodiversity conservation[12].

Explaination

Hui, McGeoch and Warren (2006) gave the following formula to describe the scaling pattern of occupancy and spatial correlation using pair approximation (e.g. in Dieckmann et al. [2000][13]) (joint-count statistics) and Bayes' rule:

This formula describe the

where

and

where is occupancy; is the conditional probability that a randomly chosen adjacent quadrate of an occupied quadrate is also occupied (Hui and Li 2004[14]); the conditional probability is the absence probability in a quadrate adjacent to an occupied one; a and 4a are the grains. See detail explanation of this equation in Hui et al. (2006).

The key point of this formula is that the scaling pattern or characteristics of species distribution (measured by occupancy and spatial pattern) can be calculated across scales without any information of the biology of the species.

References

  1. ^ Levin, SA. 1992. The problem of pattern and scale in ecology. Ecology, 73, 1943-1967.
  2. ^ Kunin, WE. 1998. Extrapolating species abundance across spatial scales. Science, 281: 1513-1515.
  3. ^ Wright, D.H. 1991. Correlations between incidence and abundance are expected by chance. Journal of Biogeography, 18: 463-466.
  4. ^ He, F., Gaston, K.J. 2000. Estimating species abundance from occurrence. American Naturalist, 156: 553-559.
  5. ^ Nachman, G. 1981. A mathematical model of the functional relationship between density and spatial distribution of a population. Journal of Animal Ecology, 50: 453-460.
  6. ^ Hanski, I., Gyllenberg, M. 1997. Uniting two general patterns in the distribution of species. Science, 284: 334-336.
  7. ^ He, F., Gaston, K.J. 2003. Occupancy, spatial variance, and the abundance of species. American Naturalist, 162: 366-375.
  8. ^ Taylor, L.R. 1961. Aggregation, variance and the mean. Nature, 189: 732-735.
  9. ^ Hui, C., McGeoch, MA. 2007. Capturing the "droopy tail" in the occupancy-abundance relationship. Ecoscience, 14: 103-108.
  10. ^ Hartley, S., Kunin, WE. 2003. Scale dependence of rarity, extinction risk, and conservation priority. Conservation Biology, 17: 1559-1570.
  11. ^ Hui, C., McGeoch, M.A., Reyers, B., le Roux, P.C., Greve, M., Chown, S.L. 2009. Extrapolating population size from the occupancy-abundance relationship and the scaling pattern of occupancy. Ecological Applications, 19: 2038-2048.
  12. ^ Wilson, RJ., Thomas, CD., Fox, R., Roy, RD., Kunin, WE. 2004. Spatial patterns in species distributions reveals biodiversity change. Nature, 432: 393-396.
  13. ^ Dieckmann, U., Law, R. & Metz, JAJ. (2000) The geometry of ecological interactions: simplifying spatial complexity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  14. ^ Hui, C. and Li, Z. (2004) Distribution pattern of metapopulation determined by Allee effects. Population Ecology, 46: 55–63.