Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tonica Marlow

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia:Articles for deletion

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by M0RD00R (talk | contribs) at 05:14, 14 January 2010. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Tonica Marlow

Tonica Marlow (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BIO WP:NOTE Not clearly notable. Most references are to church newsletters. Author of book, but the book has no Wikipedia article and is not particularly notable John Nagle (talk) 19:22, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Book is not in top 1 million on Amazon. "Tonica Marlow" has 4 hits in Google News archives. Zero hits in Google Scholar. No notability other than book. --John Nagle (talk) 19:29, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. --Apollo789 (talk) 20:36, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment "Tova Mordechai" search yields 8 gbook [1] and 36 gnews [2] hits. Does it make her notable? Not sure. I've seen less notable articles kept, and more notable deleted. Also it is worth saying that this article is mentioned at the current Arbitration proceedings [3]. Some participants might want it temporarily be kept as an evidence. M0RD00R (talk) 20:45, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. I added several references from reliable sources, including one reference from the Jerusalem Post. I think notability is firmly established. If the article is kept, it should be moved to Tova Mordechai, the name by which she is best known. I do not think that the article unduly promotes a particular point of view, but any inappropriate external links can be removed if there is a consensus to do so. - Eastmain (talk) 21:17, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Worldcat lists 50 holdings for To play with fire (©2002), 13 holdings for Playing with fire (1991), and 6 for Goodnight my friend Aleph. - Eastmain (talk) 21:25, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The book is probably more notable than the author. I could see having an article about the book. --John Nagle (talk) 06:56, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
John, feel free to repurpose the article and move to a new title along those lines, that is probably a good idea. Guy (Help!) 21:39, 13 January 2010 (UTC)\[reply]
But if we would assume that her book is notable then per WP:AUTHOR wouldn't author herself be notable as well? M0RD00R (talk) 05:14, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Tonica_Marlow&oldid=337743119"