Talk:Russian battleship Slava/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dana boomer (talk) 20:53, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I will be reviewing this article for GA status, and should have the full review up shortly! Dana boomer (talk) 20:53, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

This article looks great, and so I am passing it to GA status. The only suggestion I would have at this point, before A-class or FAC, would be to explain why she had a greater displacement and draft than as designed, in the first paragraph of the Description section. Nice work! Dana boomer (talk) 21:50, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]