Talk:Sawney

Scotland Stub‑class Mid‑importance

	Scotland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Samuel Johnson not a Scotophobe

Samuel Johnson is routinely dismissed as a Scotophobe, but this should be taken with a grain of salt. He surrounded himself with Scotsmen such as Boswell, and five of his six aids in compiling his dictionary were Northerners or Scotsmen. In his dictionary he liberally points out Scots terminolgy. It seems that he enjoyed to play a Scotophobe, but it seems a playful, respectful hatred.

Ahassan05 (talk) 15:04, 19 June 2009 (UTC)ahassan05[reply]

I don't think it should be taken with a pinch of salt. He routinely made such comments, and liked Scots, as long as they agreed with him, or worked for him. He took an almost colonial attitude to them.--MacRusgail (talk) 17:56, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Porridge Wog

'Porridge Wog' should not be included in this article for two main reasons (A) it is an article about Sawney - 'Porridge Wog' does not really have any relevance to this - I'm sure we could all think of 50 racial slurs for Scots - should they all be included? (B) Porridge Wog is not even a widely used term - I've never heard it before, and the citation provided for it is a comedy website that is hardly reputable. If 'Porridge Wog' should be mentioned anywhere it is in Wiktionary, not here. 91.106.226.28 (talk) 22:11, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]