Jump to content

User talk:Vedvyasa

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Vedvyasa (talk | contribs) at 21:51, 18 March 2010. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Lets have a nice discussion

Wendy Doniger

Your grammar is very bad,[1][2] and your insertion of outlookindia.com links is childish.[3][4] Please work on that, we can't improve this article if you will make such vague and trollish edits. Shii (tock) 16:36, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Are you joking or serious,i just copy and paste that statements from the source,however i shall keep my attention towards it too.cheers--Vedvyasa (talk) 16:41, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Are you serious? Goethan has been most disruptive. Stop this crap! Raj2004 (talk) 18:32, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Do not delete Abecedare (talk) 21:29, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vedvyasa (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

i donot know what r u all doing with my account,one is saying it a sock of someone else and you are saying it a sock of mkbdtu,i want to ask u,what i did that everyone is blaming this account as a sock

Decline reason:

Your writing style (or lack thereof) matches Mkbdtu to a "T". We're not fooled. –MuZemike 21:37, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

IP range also matches. Abecedare (talk) 21:39, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Vedvyasa (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

do you know this ip range belong to whlole india as a reliance wireless network,its a dynamic ip service,a man i mumbai may have used the same ip as the man in kashmir,so donot give such type of false arguments,i think you all personality belong to goethean,as i started opposing his view,he started in this way.well as i see know that i will have to go higher authorities of wikipedia,as u donot know me who i am,just check your account after one weeks,specially goethean,bye

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2= do you know this ip range belong to whlole india as a reliance wireless network,its a dynamic ip service,a man i mumbai may have used the same ip as the man in kashmir,so donot give such type of false arguments,i think you all personality belong to goethean,as i started opposing his view,he started in this way.well as i see know that i will have to go higher authorities of wikipedia,as u donot know me who i am,just check your account after one weeks,specially goethean,bye |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1= do you know this ip range belong to whlole india as a reliance wireless network,its a dynamic ip service,a man i mumbai may have used the same ip as the man in kashmir,so donot give such type of false arguments,i think you all personality belong to goethean,as i started opposing his view,he started in this way.well as i see know that i will have to go higher authorities of wikipedia,as u donot know me who i am,just check your account after one weeks,specially goethean,bye |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1= do you know this ip range belong to whlole india as a reliance wireless network,its a dynamic ip service,a man i mumbai may have used the same ip as the man in kashmir,so donot give such type of false arguments,i think you all personality belong to goethean,as i started opposing his view,he started in this way.well as i see know that i will have to go higher authorities of wikipedia,as u donot know me who i am,just check your account after one weeks,specially goethean,bye |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}