User talk:Giggs for Temporary

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Giggs for Temporary (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I said don't vandal my talk page. It has been indicated as a part of a reason why blocked me. Only one vandalism is made and being the only reason of blocking. It is too sensitive enough and unfair.

Decline reason:

I couldn't really understand your argument. — Daniel Case (talk) 03:52, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is asking that his block be reviewed:

Giggs for Temporary (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't think the block is justified. I just did only one wrong thing and got blocked, and the accuse of "the account only for vandalism" is absolutely a fabricated charge - as the blocker said that "If the vandalism resumes once the block expires you'll likely be blocked indefinitely." However I have to apologize for being the first one to vandal the today's featured article, making the others followed me.

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I don't think the block is justified. I just did only one wrong thing and got blocked, and the accuse of "the account only for vandalism" is absolutely a fabricated charge - as the blocker said that "If the vandalism resumes once the block expires you'll likely be blocked indefinitely." However I have to apologize for being the first one to vandal the today's featured article, making the others followed me. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I don't think the block is justified. I just did only one wrong thing and got blocked, and the accuse of "the account only for vandalism" is absolutely a fabricated charge - as the blocker said that "If the vandalism resumes once the block expires you'll likely be blocked indefinitely." However I have to apologize for being the first one to vandal the today's featured article, making the others followed me. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I don't think the block is justified. I just did only one wrong thing and got blocked, and the accuse of "the account only for vandalism" is absolutely a fabricated charge - as the blocker said that "If the vandalism resumes once the block expires you'll likely be blocked indefinitely." However I have to apologize for being the first one to vandal the today's featured article, making the others followed me. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Congratulations, you've won the Wiki-lottery!

Just kidding, you haven't. Happy April Fools!

In all seriousness, the fact that it is April Fool's Day is not a license to vandalize the encyclopedia as you said you would do here and as you have been doing (e.g. this to the Featured Article for today. You've earned a 48 hour break from editing. If the vandalism resumes once the block expires you'll likely be blocked indefinitely. --Bigtimepeace | talk | contribs 03:29, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Forgot to mention that if you want to appeal this block, just add {{unblock|Your reason here}} to your talk page and someone will be along to review the block. --Bigtimepeace | talk | contribs 03:34, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]