User talk:85.82.179.226

September 2008

Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Odyssey Moon. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. E_dog95'^{Hi '} 23:11, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

More

It is against Wikipedia policy to copy and paste text from a non-GFDL source. Period. Just don't do that anymore. It is bad form and you will be challenged if you are found doing that again. E_dog95'^{Hi '} 03:10, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I guess if you had attributed the text by placing in in quotes it would have been fine. Cheers E_dog95'^{Hi '} 03:15, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Screw this then - I'll refrain from contributing at all in the future, thanks. --85.82.179.226 (talk) 03:30, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm Sorry

I'm very sorry about removing your comment -- I must have made a mistake. My sincere apologies. ♪Tempo Di Valse♪ 01:34, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wth? No retaliatory smears? Is this a set-up? --85.82.179.226 (talk) 03:03, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

October 2008

Regarding your comments on User_talk:Tempodivalse: Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Please do not attack other editors. As well, the editor in question has apologized: please assume good faith and accept sincere apologies when given. -t BMW c- 21:52, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2010

The detectors that detected the thin atmosphere are in-situ, not in suit. If you go to the reference cited in the article (reference 3) then you will read in teh abstract that the detectors are in-situ. Also does it make sense that the atmosphere was detected by in-suit detectors left there by the Apollo missions? The very fact that they were left there implies in-situ regardless if they were detached from the astronauts suits or not.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.