Jump to content

User talk:Dawnseeker2000

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:E dog95)

Why remove sopiha robot page krupesh patoliya — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2409:4041:2CCF:6DFF:0:0:5489:2107 (talk) 02:03, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bad edit

[edit]

this is the third time in the last week or so you have added df=y to a year-only template. MB 02:42, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GAN Backlog Drive – January 2022

[edit]
Good article nominations | January 2022 Backlog Drive
January 2022 Backlog Drive:
  • On New Year's Day, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number and age of articles reviewed.
  • Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate:
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 10+ good article reviews or participated in the March backlog drive.

Click here and remove your username from the mailing list to opt out of any future messages.

--Usernameunique

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles at 21:18, 31 December 2021 (UTC).[reply]

The WikiEagle - January 2022

[edit]
The WikiEagle
The WikiProject Aviation Newsletter
Volume I — Issue 1
Aviation Project • Project discussion • Members • Assessment • Outreach • The WikiEagle
Announcements
  • After over a decade of silence, the WikiProject Aviation newsletter is making a comeback under the name The WikiEagle. This first issue was sent to all active members of the project and its sub-projects. If you wish to continue receiving The WikiEagle, you can add your username to the mailing list. For now the newsletter only covers general project news and is run by only one editor. If you wish to help or to become a columnist, please let us know. If you have an idea which you believe would improve the newsletter, please share it; suggestions are welcome and encouraged.
  • On 16 December, an RfC was closed which determined theaerodrome.com to be an unreliable source. The website, which is cited over 1,500 articles, mainly on WWI aviation, as of the publishing of this issue.
  • Luft46.com has been added to the list of problematic sources after this discussion.
  • The Jim Lovell article was promoted to Featured Article status on 26 December after being nominated by Hawkeye7.
  • The Raymond Hesselyn article was promoted to Good Article status on 4 December after being nominated by Zawed.
  • The Supermarine Sea King article was promoted to Good Article status on 22 December after being nominated by Amitchell125.
  • The William Hodgson (RAF officer) article was promoted to Good Article status on 26 December after being nominated by Zawed.
Members

New Members

Number of active members: 386. Total number of members: 921.

Closed Discussions

Featured Article assessment

Good Article assessment

Deletion

Requested moves

Article Statistics
This data reflects values from DMY.
Aviation pages by quality
Quality
Total
FA 142
FL 15
A 56
GA 505
B 4,573
C 11,878
Start 15,082
Stub 18,754
List 2,539
Category 11,638
Disambig 653
File 2,713
Portal 629
Project 89
Redirect 1,518
Template 2,489
NA 66
Assessed 73,339
Unassessed 1
Total 73,340
WikiWork factors (?) ω = 251,817 Ω = 4.91
New/Ongoing Discussions

On The Main Page

Did you know...

Discuss & propose changes to The WikiEagle at The WikiEagle talk page. To opt in/out of receiving this news letter, add or remove your username from the mailing list.
Newsletter contributor: ZLEA

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:35, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jérôme Pétion de Villeneuve

[edit]

Hi AWB is a menace on articles relating to the French Revolution as it does not recognise the Convention as an entity and AWB users sometimes exchange capital letters for small in these articles. If you are not sure that Convention and Committee of Public Safety should have capital letters, please look at the Wikipedia articles on them and related articles to satisfy yourself that this is the correct form. I reverted all the AWB changes you made because the only substantial changes were incorrect, and the others were trivial. Once you have checked this out can you please restore the correct spellings? Thanks Mccapra (talk) 16:58, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, I restored the caps and I used {{nat}} to avoid this situation in the future. Thank you very much, Dawnseeker2000 17:13, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Great stuff thanks for your help. Mccapra (talk) 17:54, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Metallica - Am i Evil.ogg listed for discussion

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Metallica - Am i Evil.ogg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:ABBA - Chiquitita.ogg

[edit]
Notice

The file File:ABBA - Chiquitita.ogg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Chorus portion of Chiquitita not proven as contextually significant to the whole song. Lyrics heard in sample possibly easy to summarize.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Cyndi Lauper - Girls Just Want To Have Fun.ogg

[edit]
Notice

The file File:Cyndi Lauper - Girls Just Want To Have Fun.ogg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Any sample can be used to promote the whole song, which is familiar to many. However, unconvinced that the whole portion represents the whole song and that the sample is needed to illustrate what the text can already convey.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Date formats

[edit]

Hi, I'm new to AWB and was wondering if you could share with me how you use AWB to audit date formats (like you did here). Many thanks, SSSB (talk) 13:25, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, yes of course. There's this editor called Ohconfucius and he's the caretaker of several groups of scripts that can be run. There's a set for use directly in the browser and there's some that can be used as modules in AWB. The modules for dates are set up specifically for mdy and dmy dates so there's one for each. I only run the DMY module because there are many more articles that use that format.
Dawnseeker2000 14:05, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Is that enough to get you going? Dawnseeker2000 20:51, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Many thanks, but I can't get it to work. Am I right in saying that you just copy and paste the code into here? However, when I tried it on my sandbox, I got this result. I am probably just being an idiot, any help would be appreciated. (also pinging @Ohconfucius:) SSSB (talk) 11:59, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, you can do it in one of two ways.

If you prefer to run AWB, you can copy the code that resides at User:Ohconfucius/AWB modules/dmy or User:Ohconfucius/AWB modules/mdy depending on which target date format you want. I stopped using AWB, so it's no longer supported. I'm not sure how the code will work in the current version, but I know that there were some false positives, and using it was quite clumsy compared with running the script.

Alternatively, the MOSNUM dates script that you have loaded into your commons.js file is more sophisticated, and won't go changing dates within title strings, for example. You will access both dmy and mdy alignments by the choice of a sidebar script button. I wrote the family of scripts, which has many of the functions in common with AWB (or maybe AWB writers have updated their codes to do some of the things my scripts do?). The script is more reliable than my AWB code because it employs a more elaborate system of protections that limits false positives that I could not prevent when using AWB.

Regards, -- Ohc revolution of our times 13:19, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Well it seems that something is happening, so that's good, but it didn't tag the article with any date format template. There's a lot of moving parts with these sets of scripts (whether it's the browser or AWB version), but the AWB modules are truly like the old west because they haven't been updated since the mid-2010s. I sent you a modified version of the one that I use for dmy. It's got the current date in it so the date will be updated as it should. Dawnseeker2000 01:27, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, Dawnseeker. The modified version you sent me works. Many thanks! SSSB (talk) 09:24, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm a bit confused on your date formatting changes. I was under the impression that when we institute a dmy or mdy format on an article, and we date that format, that the date should remain so we all know when it was instituted. The date should never change unless the format itself changes. That way we can tell editors "look, it's been this format for 7 years so please don't change it." If you start changing them to todays date that become useless. Fyunck(click) (talk) 22:11, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

We can simply go back in the article's history if a dispute occurs regarding the format. The date format templates are used for maintenance. See Template:Use dmy dates Dawnseeker2000 22:18, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Strange but I see it does say the date of the template should change when an editor checks for inconsistent dates throughout the article. Are you checking for date errors when you update the dates? Because a date change will tell me that the article is correct and proper on the new date. Thanks. Fyunck(click) (talk) 23:35, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of WP:CEN discussion

[edit]

There is currently a discussion at the current events noticeboard regarding a topic you may be interested in or an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is The Russo–Ukrainian crisis and World War III speculation. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 08:27, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Just a Little Bit (Mutya Buena song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Amazon.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Barnstar of Diligence
Thank you for your many edits on your AWB editing across the multitude of station pages!! Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 19:13, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

'script-assisted date audit and style fixes' editing errors

[edit]

I have come across several articles that have had errors introduced by these fixes.

Examples:

--Bamyers99 (talk) 00:00, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I was aware of that issue, and have changed my code to avoid it in the future, but it was all my doing and had no relationship to Ohconfucius's script. Thanks for the message. Dawnseeker2000 20:18, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022 Good Article Nominations backlog drive

[edit]
Good article nominations | June 2022 Backlog Drive
  • On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number and age of articles reviewed.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here!
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives.
Click here to opt out of any future messages.

(t · c) buidhe 04:26, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A recent earthquake in Shropshire.

[edit]

So not too long a go, a 3.8 magnitude earthquake struck Shropshire. The British Geological Survey apparently said the tremor happened at a depth of 8km near the town of Wem. How are your thoughts on the matter? O tempo voa (talk) 17:27, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm much more familiar with earthquakes in California because I lived there for a long time, but you might ask User:Mikenorton as he is a London-based geologist. Dawnseeker2000 19:47, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Possibly something to do with the Wem-Bridgemere-Red Rock Fault System. Mikenorton (talk) 21:42, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
There's also this from the BGS:
British Geological Survey
@BritGeoSurvey
 Twitter logo, a stylized blue bird

Here's a seismogram of the 3.8ML quake in #Shropshire earlier, and a map which shows the historic seismicity in the area in relation to today's event.

30 May 2022[1]

References

  1. ^ British Geological Survey [@BritGeoSurvey] (30 May 2022). "Here's a seismogram of the 3.8ML quake in #Shropshire earlier, and a map which shows the historic seismicity in the area in relation to today's event" (Tweet) – via Twitter.

Dawnseeker2000 22:02, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Who's on First?, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The St. Petersburg Times.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Links to Football League Championship rather than the article name EFL Championship, and similar

[edit]

Hello, and thank you for all your cleanup work. You probably aren't aware that the English football/soccer competitions now known as EFL Championship, EFL League One, EFL Cup and similar were renamed to those names as part of a rebranding exercise in 2016. Before that, they were named the Football League Championship, Football League One, Football League Cup etc. Either is fine as the target of a piped link, but if the full name of the competition is visible to the reader and refers to 2016 or earlier, as e.g. the last change in this edit, it should be left chronologically accurate. There was no such thing as the EFL Cup in 1963. thanks, Struway2 (talk) 19:46, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you again for tips in this area. Cheers! Dawnseeker2000 22:38, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Karina Lomabard

[edit]

What the hell is wrong with you? Rather than simply deleting the reference to the missing file, you actually think it more productive to add a new "category:Articles with missing files, totally useless. There is no missing file. 48Pills (talk) 04:02, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Electric Light Orchestra - Calling America.ogg

[edit]
Notice

The file File:Electric Light Orchestra - Calling America.ogg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Sample inadequate to help readers understand the song (as a whole). May fail WP:NFCC#8.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:02, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John Robertson (footballer, born 1964), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Toyama.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to 2011 CR Vasco da Gama season may have broken a template

[edit]

Hello,

This edit that you made to the 2011 CR Vasco da Gama season article appears to have broken the Players § First-team squad table of player names. I have tried to fix it but I'm not knowledgeable enough with the relevant template. Could you give it a look?

Regards — rbstrachan (talk) 15:57, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi and thanks for bringing this up! I restored the text as it was prior to my change in 2020 and it's much better now, though maybe not exactly as intended. I'm thoroughly unfamiliar with those templates and usage of the parameters may have changed. Cheers! Dawnseeker2000 21:17, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Images of Airbus aircraft

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Images of Airbus aircraft indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:14, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:George Thorogood - One Bourbon, One Scotch, One Beer.ogg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:George Thorogood - One Bourbon, One Scotch, One Beer.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:21, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2008 Vancouver, Washington tornado for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2008 Vancouver, Washington tornado is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2008 Vancouver, Washington tornado until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Ks0stm (T•C•G•E)  If you reply here, please ping me by using {{re|Ks0stm}} in your reply.  08:12, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Trying to get WikiProject Amateur Radio back on the air!

[edit]

Hi, I'm Dr vulpes (💬 • 📝) and I'm currently doing my best to resurrect the amateur radio WikiProject. A lot of the articles need some serious work and so I'm trying to organize an article improvement drive in October. If you're interested check out the link to the drive and the project page. Right now everything is in the planning stages, trying to find people interested, articles to focus on, etc. So if you know anyone who would like to help out feel free to invite them! If you no longer interested in this project that's a-ok just remove yourself from the list on the project page and I'll never badger you again. 73! Dr vulpes (💬 • 📝) 00:33, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

wstitle parameter

[edit]

With this edit (Revision as of 16:54, 2 April 2021) you broke the link to a Wikisource article. DNB articles on Wikisource use a dash not an ndash in dab extensions. Use the display= parameter to display the article name with an ndash on the Wikipedia page. Please fix you script not to alter templates with a wstitle= parameter. There is a category of pages which shows broken the links to the Wikisource articles caused by such edits. PBS (talk) 13:33, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

As of now they have rebranded to Go.Compare.

They rebranded their website and released a tv ad with the new logo. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.141.23.252 (talk) 19:43, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine. Please put in a move request to handle the name change to the article and please be aware that you've broken the file name twice now. Dawnseeker2000 19:46, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AWB edit of quotation

[edit]

Your AWB edit, my partial reversion

Probably AWB ought not modify a direct quotation here, so I've reverted it. I can't actually check the quote - because {{cn}} - but it seems improbable that AWB did either. Mitch Ames (talk) 04:06, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for that. Dawnseeker2000 04:09, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Re-nominating three former GA nom. articles

[edit]

Hi, I will be re-nominating three EQ articles which you had done so previously. I will resolve the issues raised in the previous nominations and probably add on my own before nominating. Thanks for working on them.

Dora the Axe-plorer (explore) 05:52, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh OK. That's kind of weird. Dawnseeker2000 08:20, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Commonwealth of the Philippines: Difference between revisions

[edit]

I do not understand this reversion. Your edit summary does not match the edit action. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 00:38, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your change broke the file name and I restored it after seeing that the article was in Category:Articles with missing files. Dawnseeker2000 00:40, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
That dawned on me soon after I made that comment. The image file seems misnamed, but I'll not pursue that. I'll mention it at Wikipedia talk:Tambayan Philippines, though. Thanks & cheers. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 00:49, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited East Germany, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The St. Petersburg Times.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Help on Draft:QuakeAlertUSA and Early Warning Labs

[edit]

I saw you were active on Earthquakes too! I'd love some input on these articles if you had some time. EricFishers11 (talk) 23:58, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cardiff Arms Park

[edit]

You have previously edited Cardiff Arms Park. An editor has decided to split the article (yet again). I would like to know your view on the new edit....see Talk:Cardiff_Arms_Park#Article_Split_(again). SethWhales talk 20:14, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Cyndi Lauper - I Drove All Night.ogg

[edit]
Notice

The file File:Cyndi Lauper - I Drove All Night.ogg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

justification for sample usage not well illustrated in the song article. sample unnecessary to help readers contextualize and understand the whole song. the sample's role similar to the article's: promoting (awareness of) and marketing the song just by song title and artist's name, both searchable. may fail WP:NFCC#8.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Japan (2023 film)

[edit]

Hi Dawnseeker, I hope you will be interested in editing film related wiki pages. I want you to take part in an AFD discussion of the Karthi's new movie Japan. I think AFD is being created by some foreigners who don't know much about Indian Films. Being an Indian I feel that you will understand more and point out your genuine opininion whatever it be in the AFD . Here is the link - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Japan_(2023_film) Jehowahyereh (talk) 05:17, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property

[edit]

Hi there, I have partially reverted your edit because the content of a quote should not be reformatted. Cheers, Edcolins (talk) 16:31, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

[edit]

Information icon Hello. In a recent edit to the page Battle of Belmont (1899), you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, India, or Pakistan use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author of the article used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. WaIterFord (talk) 04:16, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked the whole range

[edit]

Hi, you reported 204.14.13.227 on WP:AIV. I have blocked the entire range 204.14.12.0/22 (which contains that IP address). The range belongs to Capital Area Intermediate Unit, which operates online learning programs for local schools. It now has a 3-year school block. ~Anachronist (talk) 00:13, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that, Dawnseeker2000 00:16, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Megadeth - Peace Sells.ogg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Megadeth - Peace Sells.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:29, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year, Dawnseeker2000!

[edit]
Happy New Year!

Dawnseeker2000,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
— Moops ⋠T⋡ 20:16, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

— Moops ⋠T⋡ 20:16, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WP:EXEMPT (I'm blocked from editing)

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Dawnseeker2000 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi, I just moved to a new physical residence and have found that my current connection method has me on a blocked IP. "The IP address or range ‪2600:100F:B100:0:0:0:0:0/40‬ has been blocked (disabled) by ‪Materialscientist‬ for the following reason(s): This block will expire on 18:06, 22 January 2023." Please consider setting me up for IP address block exemption. Dawnseeker2000 01:23, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

I adjusted the block. You should be able to edit now. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:54, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Nomination of The Pearl Qatar for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Pearl Qatar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Pearl Qatar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

— The Anome (talk) 13:07, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jean-Claude Molinari, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The St. Petersburg Times.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Errors introduced in AWB edits

[edit]

Hi, letting you know:

  1. In this edit, you incorrectly changed several of the prime symbols in 2′B′+B′2′+B′2′ to apostrophes: 2′B'+B′2'+B′2'
  2. In this edit, you incorrectly removed a space from Bombardier Wins A £223 Million Order..., which appears to denominate the order in Australian pounds: Bombardier Wins A£223 Million Order...

Could I ask you please to check your scripts and process, so as to avoid recurrence? Thanks. XAM2175 (T) 13:06, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You made the same mistake with prime symbols here. Please note this. XAM2175 (T) 13:58, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Genes, Brain and Behavior

[edit]

Hi, Out of curiosity, why would you change "2013" in that dmy template to "2023"? I can't think of any reason for that, so please educate me. Thanks. --Randykitty (talk) 10:04, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, of course. I ran some lines of code in AWB for that change that checks for consistency of date formats (DMY in this case, but there's also MDY for US topics) and those templates are used as an indicator of the last time a consistency check was performed. The intent and purpose of the templates is laid out at Template:Use dmy dates and their usage is tracked at Category:Use dmy dates. The TL;DR is that when a page is checked for consistency, the date in the template is changed to the current month and year, and since there are typically thousands of articles in each month since early 2011 (1.57 million total articles), I've been going through them for date formatting and ref improvements, among other things. Cheers! Dawnseeker2000 10:22, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nice, I learned something, thanks! --Randykitty (talk) 10:28, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An old AWB error you made ...

[edit]

Hello, just a heads-up: this edit to remove a hyphen on the Rules of netball article by Rhynhardtk surprised me a bit ... I thought that page wouldn't have basic problems like that. It turns out that the hyphen was added in an AWB edit of yours from 2020 ... I probably should've checked it more thoroughly when you made it! Just letting you know in case that can help prevent it in the future. Graham87 17:05, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Carrie Anne
added a link pointing to Cashbox
Don't Lose My Number
added a link pointing to Cashbox

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

script needs fixing

[edit]

At this edit, your script changed this: |newspaper=[[The Sydney Morning Herald]] to this: |newspaper=''[[The Sydney Morning Herald]]'' (2×). It should not do that. Italics for newspapers is handled automatically by {{cite news}} so extraneous italic markup is an error condition and is flagged as such.

—Trappist the monk (talk) 16:13, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for spotting that. Dawnseeker2000 16:37, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Edit a Wikipedia Page

[edit]

Hey, Can you help me edit a Wikipedia page?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ravi_Shankar_(spiritual_leader)

We want to change this page name to

Gurudev Sri Sri Ravi Shankar Creator1998 (talk) 02:58, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, just follow the instructions at WP:RSPM. Dawnseeker2000 03:30, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Blood donation restrictions on men who have sex with men

[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Blood donation restrictions on men who have sex with men, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 22:18, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Horace Finch

[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Horace Finch, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 20:54, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Sinéad O'Carroll

[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Sinéad O'Carroll, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 01:25, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Deaths in March 2009

[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Deaths in March 2009, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 23:17, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Access-dates for news articles with an existing publication date

[edit]

Hello. I noticed your script was now removing access-dates from news articles on the grounds they were not required if the news article has a publication date, but I'm not sure that's right.

Help:Citation Style 1#Access date says they're not required for linked documents that do not change, and goes on to clarify that access-date "is not required for links to copies of published research papers accessed via DOI or a published book, but should be used for links to news articles on commercial websites (these can change from time to time, even if they are also published in a physical medium)." cheers, Struway2 (talk) 17:19, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Struway2: I agree with you; it's not right. Only stuff that cannot be changed, e.g. printed newspapers, magazines, books etc., doesn't need to have an access-date. Everything else that can be changed after publishing needs an access-date. SLBedit (talk) 23:22, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I think there's a fair amount to be said about this and I'm wondering if either of you have an account on Discord. We can use a voice channel there to talk this out. Dawnseeker2000 19:21, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I prefer to keep any Wikipedia discussions public and on-wiki. Think my view comes down to:
  1. Purely from personal experience, I've spent a fair amount of my time on here adding archive-urls to dead links (manually, including checking the thing that bots can't – that the archive copy actually includes the content cited), and the presence of an access-date does make that job easier.
  2. As I said above, Help:CS1 clarifies that access-dates should be used for links to news articles on commercial websites, because they can change. There's no practical difference between such pages and non-news articles on any other non-static website. Whether the online article mirrors the print version or not, whether there even was a print version – newspaper websites publish articles that didn't appear in print, or in a version different from the print version, or in an updated or corrected version, (ideally with date of update/correction supplied). News websites, such as Sky News or BBC News, have no print version: the BBC in particular are notorious for changing their content over time without indicating a date of last update.
  3. The cite-web template family documentation did for a time say that access-dates were "not required for links to published research papers, published books, or news articles with publication dates", but the wording changed to match Help:CS1 in August 2022.
  4. I'm aware that there's quite a variety of opinion as to the usefulness of access-dates, which rather backs up my general belief that there are no guidelines/instructions/whatever that override Help:CS1 and the Citation Style documentation. Absent any such, I'm pretty sure a little private chat won't override them either.
Please don't take this the wrong way. I admire the work you do with keeping formatting up to current standards. I just think that this is a step too far and in the wrong direction. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 19:20, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on List of adventure films of the 1950s

[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page List of adventure films of the 1950s, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 15:55, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:The Bangles - A Hazy Shade Of Winter.ogg

[edit]
Notice

The file File:The Bangles - A Hazy Shade Of Winter.ogg has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the file should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Anthony Hammond

[edit]

Hi, thanks for your recent edits to this page. The only thing I don't understand is why you have deleted the bracketed word "(Google)" from the end of all the references which make links to pages in googlebooks. It's quite normal to put "(Hathi Trust)" or "(Internet Archive)", or (Early English Books Online)", etc., after references which link to one of those pages, so that the reader knows what they are being invited to click on, and "(Google)" is just in the same category. Unless there is a very good reason, therefore, please don't delete them, as they will otherwise all need putting back in manually. Probably this is a flaw in a robot script? Thanks, Eebahgum (talk) 11:04, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the reason I remove those when I see them is because it's information that doesn't help the reader find the information that's cited. If you look at cite book for example, there's no parameter for host or something similar. Dawnseeker2000 03:07, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for replying. Whatever the shortcomings of "cite book" (which is not a compulsory reference format in wikipedia, and which often contains poorly-entered data), I believe the host-identifier in a properly-ordered free-text reference containing an external link remains very useful to the readers, as it enables them to click with confidence knowing that they are not crossing into an unsafe or unreliable webspace. [I don't normally give date of access, except with "(British History Online)" links, where the bibliographic formula given in the source automatically records date of access.] This seems still to be a matter of subjective preference. I can see that, over 1 million articles, 200 bytes per article (to name hosts for 15 refs p/art) could add up to a lot of page-space! Is that also the motivating factor? Good wishes, Eebahgum (talk) 06:50, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
there's no parameter for host or something similar. Not true. |via= serves this purpose; see the parameter documentation.
—Trappist the monk (talk) 11:54, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, this is true. I'm very familiar. Communication by text has its shortcomings. I don't think you're arguing for or against, but I should add that I think that Google Books links are ubiquitous now and are no longer a novelty. Dawnseeker2000 15:59, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Well, your last point is rather the problem, because there are plenty of books which, at page level, aren't accessible in Googlebooks, but are in Internet Archive, or in Hathi Trust, or in various national library readers such as Persee or Munich Digitizierungzentrum, etc etc, and so one has to link to these other sites as well, depending on where the source is available and readable, and one still has to host-identify them. And if you are saying that Google (specifically) shouldn't be named but should be the assumed default of all booklinks, then in addition to a vast backlog of correction needed, across the whole encyclopedia, you are also working in the opposite direction to the Internet Archive Bot, which (very annoyingly) went about (and may still be going about) substituting IA booklinks for Google booklinks, often inaccurately or incompletely, and generally mucking things up. When I write a freetext (analogue) reference with a pagelink, I always check that it "works", that the page-views accessed are clear and readable, and that the information hierarchy in the ref itself is in proper conformity and as complete as I can make it: and so, because I know it works properly, I try to make sure it stays that way! It's that golden rule of "always verify your references". But I don't want to be on a collision course with anybody. Eebahgum (talk) 19:49, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AWB again

[edit]

Please review your single AWB edit to Drumcondra, Dublin, and let me know which errors you notice in hindsight. What will you do differently moving forward? Sam Sailor 17:43, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What you can do is read my user page. Dawnseeker2000 18:12, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
What you should do is respond to my question. Sam Sailor 18:35, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Where can I locate the "inclusion criteria"

[edit]

Your most recent edit on List of earthquakes in California states in the edit note "please observe the inclusion criteria". I tried looking but could not definitively locate the criteria you seem to be referring to. Could you please let me know where I can find this information? Paradoxsociety 19:44, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it's at the bottom of the table. Dawnseeker2000 20:21, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 1999 Aïn Témouchent earthquake

[edit]
Notice

The article 1999 Aïn Témouchent earthquake has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG as the text portion of the article is unsourced, and article has no media-based reliable secondary sources, and is entirely sourced by trivial government sources and 2 academic publications, so notability is difficult to determine. To me, this has 2 actual sources for notability, and an earthquake in 1999 (modern history), should have more sources to show notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 22:35, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 1999 Aïn Témouchent earthquake for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 1999 Aïn Témouchent earthquake is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1999 Aïn Témouchent earthquake until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 01:32, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Images of sport utility vehicles

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Images of sport utility vehicles indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 04:34, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pakistan Muslim League (Q), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Al Jazeera.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

MOSNUM_dates improvements

[edit]

Hi: I notice you are a regular user of User:Ohconfucius/script/MOSNUM dates.js. I've made some changes to get the Use...dates templates inserted in a place that's more in accordance with MOS:ORDER. It doesn't (yet) move the template if it is already there in the source, so it will only make a difference with new insertions.

Before getting the official version replaced, would you be so good as to give my version a final shakedown? If you see it doing anything badly wrong, please let me know. To use it, in your common.js on line 5, replace Ohconfucius with DavidBrooks (and flush cache). Thanks in advance. David Brooks (talk) 17:59, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes sir, will do that today. Dawnseeker2000 18:02, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Burmese alphabet

[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Burmese alphabet, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 00:05, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Cranberries - I Just Shot John Lennon.ogg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Cranberries - I Just Shot John Lennon.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:08, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Images of military aircraft

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Images of military aircraft indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. --TheImaCow (talk) 15:39, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Images of Lockheed aircraft

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Images of Lockheed aircraft indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 02:51, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Images of McDonnell Douglas aircraft

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Images of McDonnell Douglas aircraft indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 02:53, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Concrete Blonde - Joey.ogg

[edit]
Notice

The file File:Concrete Blonde - Joey.ogg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Portion/Sample not an improvement to understanding the whole song. Also, words not hard to summarize in free text. In other words, not contextually significant.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. George Ho (talk) 05:54, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1: website vs publisher

[edit]

Hi Dawnseeker. I saw your your edit to Crown Dependencies and that you'd replaced some instances of the website= parameter to publisher=. I know we seldom use both in the same reference, but I am unclear why publisher would be preferred over website? Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 19:16, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, there's a couple different philosophies around Wikipedia when dealing with website vs publisher. Ask someone else and you'll probably get a very different answer, but the reasons that I do things the way that I do are based on what I've learned from the Citation bot group and Ohconfucious's style. Some of the main points that I consider are described here an an overly-simplistic way (if you'd like further clarification, just ask):
  • There's a relationship between work and publisher. Consider old media and new media. Websites are not always shown with italics. One thing you can do to help make a decision is to check our own article on a subject to see whether it should be italicized or not. Check whether "italic title" has been applied to the article.
  • Then there's the "human readable" component. I replace "www.cia.gov" with "Central Intelligence Agency"
There's a ton more to say about this, of course, but those are just a few of the things that I work on. Dawnseeker2000 23:14, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Jewel - Foolish Games.ogg

[edit]
Notice

The file File:Jewel - Foolish Games.ogg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Second bridge and partial second chorus heard in sample not proven contextually significant to the whole song. No proof yet that omitting this sample would detriment the understanding of the song.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. George Ho (talk) 00:23, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your help

[edit]

Thank you for your helpful edit at The Dropout (podcast). Thanks for coming by the article, Princessa Unicorn (talk) 01:23, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited M32 motorway, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert McAlpine.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sheringham Lifeboat Station

[edit]

@Dawnseeker2000

Hi.

Please can you tell me the reason for your update.? Is it something I should be doing?

MartinOjsyork (talk) 05:32, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've been working on ensuring that date formatting is consistent in our articles by using the tools that are available. I'm working on articles from August 2013 right now and that's why you saw my change. It's kind of a niche thing to do, but you're welcome to use any of the tools that are available. You can check out User:Ohconfucius/script/MOSNUM dates.js. If you have any questions let me know. Dawnseeker2000 04:49, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Dawnseeker2000
I'm still not clear with this, and I find MOS topics don't explain what I need.
So in easy terms, please tell me why you would change...
Use dmy dates|date=August 2013, to , Use dmy dates|date=June 2024
but leave..
Use British English|date=August 2013
MartinOjsyork (talk) 16:06, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't work on English variety formatting. I only work on date formatting by using groups of scripts that help semi-automate the process. The date is changed whenever they are checked to be consistent as described at Use dmy dates Dawnseeker2000 20:50, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020 in East Africa, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages 17, 22 and 28.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:43, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.
Dawnseeker2000 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Dawnseeker2000 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Drug Reenactment". The reason given for Drug Reenactment's block is: " Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because it has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Also, your username gives the impression that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy. If you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization, you may request unblock and a username change. In your reasons, you must follow all these steps: Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement; and Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked; and Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked; and Provide a new username. To do this, insert the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. Please note that the new username you choose cannot already be taken and in use by another account. You can search to see if the username you'd like to choose is available. If the search returns that no global account with that username exists, that means it is still available. Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. ".

Accept reason: Done, but you're still probably not going to be able to edit from this IP address. It's hard blocked as a proxy. If you're running any p2p proxy software, VPNs, or privacy enhancing software, you should disable them. If you're not doing any of that, and you've scanned your PC for malware, you may wish to request IP block exemption. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 22:45, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Date format

[edit]

Hi Dawnseeker2000 - thanks for your cleanup on the dates at Heracleum mantegazzianum! The page had been improperly changed from UK English to American some time back between 2009 and 2018, and I was restoring the original English spellings per MOS:Retain. Back then, it didn't have any date settings specification, references weren't generally dated that long ago. I had wanted to add a tag to specify the ISO 8601 standard yyyy-mm-dd as the most appropriate, but I couldn't find the correct tag; neither "Use ymd dates" nor "Use y-m-d dates" worked (they gave red no valid template notes), so I added "Use dmy dates" as the only European option I could find. Is there a tag for ISO 8601 dates, and if there is, could it be added, please? Thanks! - MPF (talk) 16:40, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not for the article body. For cs1|2 templates ({{cite book}} etc) you can add |cs1-dates= to {{use dmy dates}} to tell Module:Citation/CS1 how to render dates in cs1|2 templates. See Template:Use dmy dates § Auto-formatting citation template dates.
There have been reports that the date-formatter script ignores |cs1-dates= and overwrites YYYY-MM-DD dates in cs1|2 templates, but cs1|2 will still display the dates as instructed by |cs1-dates=.
—Trappist the monk (talk) 17:21, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Trappist the monk - thanks! Sounds too complex for me :-)) I'll just leave it as dmy in that case - MPF (talk) 17:39, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

[edit]

I was having trouble using reFill (was introducing errors), and didn't know where to ask to get someone to run it. Still learning. Best, ForksForks (talk) 15:49, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Connie Talbot's Christmas Album, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Amazon.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:30, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pitchfork, etc.

[edit]

Hi, Dawnseeker. Please take more care with your editing--you have un-italicized the name of Pitchfork, as one example, and changed its citation many times, despite this being incorrect. I've fixed some, but I'm guessing there are many more errors out there. Please first check the parent articles for these music-related sites to see how they should be formatted. I understand your reasoning for changing AllMusic from website to publisher--also technically incorrect--although most regular music editors have stopped "caring" about the resulting italics in the citation, preferring to use the correct citation format instead. Thank you. Cheers. Caro7200 (talk) 11:53, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for your thoughts. There are competing philosophies regarding the use of italics for websites and the manual of style is no exception with regard to the lack of clarity. The MoS includes contradictory instructions regarding how italics are to be applied. An an experienced editor, with several hundred thousand edits in this specific area (ref formatting and italics, publisher vs work, etc.) I am not yet ready to challenge these inconsistencies in the MoS.
One of the reasons why I'm not immediately considering making a challenge is because even the two competing ref formatting tools (Ohconfucius's "Sources" group of scripts and Citation bot cannot agree on the most basic of ideas.
I'm glad that you mentioned looking at the parent article as a means to gauge whether italics should be applied; I do this very often. The problem is that {{italic title}} has been applied to hundreds of articles where it probably should not have. Dawnseeker2000 18:05, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your reply. I'll grant you that working in academia has made me a complete cynic about the fetishization of citation styles. Regular editors at the WP album project have long lamented that WP renders AllMusic in italics with the proper website usage. I think, to use the above example again, you're far in the WP minority when in comes to Pitchfork. Have a good weekend. Caro7200 (talk) 00:34, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Probably you are right, I am curious to know why "September 2013" has been replaced by "August 2024"? https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Hunting_of_the_Snark&diff=1239791809&oldid=1227359739 DL5MDA (talk) 17:58, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. There are literally thousands of things to know about this website. The date is a way to track when date formats have been checked for compliance and uniformity. I run the semi-automated browser AWB with a module (a compilation of scripts) that accomplishes this task. So when I run the scripts it changes the date to let everyone else know that that is the last time it was checked. Dawnseeker2000 18:20, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DMY & MOS:DATETIES

[edit]

I’ve noticed you are still changing non-military American articles to the DMY date format instead of MDY, which is contrary to MOS:DATETIES. I wanted to remind you about MOS:DATETIES. Stereorock (talk) 13:18, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, have we spoke before and could you please add some diffs so we can talk about them? Dawnseeker2000 17:51, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
We have. I am trying to remember what it was, but you had said (I am paraphrasing) that there was no “use mdy dates” in an article that you saw fit to change it to DMY, except it was an article about something American & non-military, to which I pointed out MOS:DATETIES. I want to say that the article was about a television station. Stereorock (talk) 23:29, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, I recall now, and I found our conversation on your talk page from March 2020. I modified the way I do things around that time as evidenced here. Just as a reminder, aside from that small portion of changes from DMY to MDY, my goal isn't to go around and "fix" or change from one style to another. I'm actually just solely working on DMY articles by ensuring that the ones that are tagged really truly are. So yeah, I changed the way I am doing things based on that conversation.
Actually, I recall in the last month or so editing a couple of articles that weren't tagged as DMY or MDY, but I did let the scripts at least unify the article to DMY because I noticed that both styles were in use. I wonder if you stumbled across one of those. Dawnseeker2000 01:55, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I may have. The latest one was from April, which I saw today (Love on the Spectrum U.S.). 2020 sounds about right, as it seems a while back.
The ones I find confusing/conflicting are the Canadian ones, which I try to make sure they all have unified dates. I thought Canadian English used the MDY style (and assumed Canadian French was DMY), but apparently they can go either way. Anyway, have a good night! Stereorock (talk) 02:05, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ENGVAR edits

[edit]

Hey Dawnseeker, when you're cleaning up articles, can you avoid changing ENGVAR-related terms like "Second World War" to "World War II" as you did here? Thanks. Parsecboy (talk) 13:16, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Fleetwood Mac - Say You Love Me.ogg

[edit]
Notice

The file File:Fleetwood Mac - Say You Love Me.ogg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't contextually signify (the importance and impact of) the song. Deletion may not affect understanding of the song. Contextual significance ≠ portion/object identity.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. George Ho (talk) 06:00, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fleetwood Mac - Say You Love Me.ogg listed for discussion

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Fleetwood Mac - Say You Love Me.ogg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. George Ho (talk) 05:05, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of knights and ladies of the Garter, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richard Pole.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

More files proposed for deletion

[edit]

If left uncontested for at least seven days, the following files will be deleted:

George Ho (talk) 07:03, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

More files proposed for deletion:

This file (File:Soggy Bottom Boys Feat. Dan Tyminski - I Am A Man Of Constant Sorrow.ogg) will be deleted as replaceable if left uncontested for at least two days. George Ho (talk) 23:16, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

coords bot

[edit]

Hello. I apologise, I did not see your message at User talk:KiranBOT (I have redirected that page to my talkpage now). It was a trial run, and I have fixed some issues, but the task did not have a consensus. I think I will soon start a discussion for the consensus, and see how it goes. Thanks for the message, and apologies for the delay in response. —usernamekiran (talk) 19:22, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

More files listed at FFD

[edit]

At Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2024 October 30:

George Ho (talk) 06:45, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Soggy Bottom Boys Feat. Dan Tyminski - I Am A Man Of Constant Sorrow.ogg listed for discussion

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Soggy Bottom Boys Feat. Dan Tyminski - I Am A Man Of Constant Sorrow.ogg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

174.128.153.62 (talk) 15:34, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Use of language=en in citations

[edit]

Hi, Dawnseeker2000. Thanks for this edit at Glossary of Brazil investigative terms which improved some of the citations. However, in one case you removed |language=en for a citation in English. Please do not do this, as citations are often copied to other Wikipedias, and this assures proper use of the param in other language Wikipedias, while not adding extraneous information about the citation in en-wiki. If that is omething that AWB is doing by default, please lmk and that needs to be removed from the pattern. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 07:10, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, no this is not built-in to AWB. It's part of a collection of scripts that I've borrowed from a tool that has very widespread use on Wikipedia. I'm inclined to keep using it as there doesn't seem to be much sense in keeping these around just in case the text and refs could be used on a non-English WP platform. Quite a bit of what I do is trimming bloat, and these English language parameters can easily be added if and when the time comes that they are transferred to one of those other platforms. I'm taking this stance not only because of the "excess baggage" theory, but also because computers are really good a copying text. If the need arises, the editor can simply paste away. Dawnseeker2000 23:43, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Dawnseeker2000, I do not agree that it is bloat, and even if it is a wash, every edit should improve an article in some way, no matter how small, and I fail to see how removing the language parameter is an improvement. Trappist, it seems to me I've seen guidance about this somewhere, but don't recall if it was just an essay, or something more community-supported. Do you recall if there is there anything about not deleting |language=en from a citation template if it is provided by an editor? Mathglot (talk) 01:32, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There was this recent discussion: Help talk:Citation Style 1/Archive 96 § language=en. Because visual editor/citoid adds |language=en (plain and in various regional flavors), any tool operated by one or a few editors that removes |language=en is pretty much a wasted effort. Fix things that can be fixed. If you really, really, really dislike |language=en at en.wiki, convince the visual editor/citoid maintainers to stop adding |language=<tag> when <tag> matches <tag>.wiki. If you do that then actively removing |language=en from en.wiki might be worth doing (assuming that there is consensus here to do that...). A better use of effort focused in the same arena, would be to replace |language=English with |language=en.
—Trappist the monk (talk) 02:06, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, that would be a beneficial change, as |language=en can be picked up in other language wikis and just work, whereas |language=English cannot. Mathglot (talk) 02:19, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Without going into too much detail, and since this is the first that I've come across CS1 translator, could you give a quick overview? Dawnseeker2000 02:24, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes; see below. Mathglot (talk) 03:45, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict) Also, it's people who have to copy citations, not computers, and if they copy one which lacks the language param, they have to copy twice: once for the citation, and once to re-add the language. For those dozen or so Wikipedia languages that have a version of the CS1 translator module, an editor does not have to touch the English citations at all, as they will generate proper references in the other language wiki format, except for the |language=en parameter, which will have to be re-added if it was removed. Mathglot (talk) 02:12, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Just my opinion, as I happened to be looking at this talk page. I think it is bloat -- it makes the edit page harder to work with, as people have to wade through all the code. Plus, people often specify a particular kind of English (Brit, Amer, Canadian, etc.), and they are often wrong! I thought that it was clear in some guideline or other that the parameter is not needed in English Wikipedia. Is that wrong? Ssilvers (talk) 20:34, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ssilvers, you are correct, it is not needed in English Wikipedia. But that doesn't mean it isn't a good idea. The parameters publisher, location, edition, original-date, and isbn aren't needed either, but they are a good idea, so I use them (as well as some of the other parameters that are not needed, but helpful, like archive-url, author-link, orig-date, and oclc). Also, Wikipedia is not just English Wikipedia; it is an international project with Wikipedias in over 300 languages. Many Wikipedians edit only the English Wikipedia, but there are more editors (and more articles) in the other 299+ Wikipedias, and the editors there often copy citations from English Wikipedia ; having the language=en param makes importing a proper citation easier. So, coming back to your original point: yes, the param is not needed in English Wikipedia, but it is helpful for all of the other ones. Does that make sense?
The other point concerns making the wikicode harder to read; but this is somewhat of a red herring, as you could say the same thing about all the other "unnecessary paramters"; should we then scrub long citations to remove publisher, edition, archive-url, and all the rest because they are unnecessary? It would generate all sorts of strife and arguments about which ones are really "necessary" and which ones aren't. And there is a solution to the "makes the wikicode harder" issue, namely, using short citations. That doesn't fix the issue for already established articles having inline citations, but if it is important enough to you, you can fix the issue using list-defined references. As an example, look at the horror show of the first paragraph of the lead in this version of Eric Zemmour, with the dozens of inline citations making it hard to pick out where the actual visible content of the page is. A few edits later, and it looked like this, with the wikicode taking up about one vertical inch in my laptop edit window, and the lead content easily visible, all while causing no change to the rendered page for article readers. That is the way to really get rid of bloat; dropping one param here and there that you think is unnecessary gets you very little benefit, even if everyone agrees with the removal. The bloat, if there is any, resides not in one individual param, but in where the references are placed, and that is something you have control over. Mathglot (talk) 22:16, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Explanation of CS1 translator

[edit]

This is as brief as I can do it: let's do the French-to-English direction, as the result will look more familiar to you. The French cite web template is called Lien web, and is coded over there like this:

{{lien web |langue= |nom1= |prénom1= |titre= |url= |date= |site= |page= }}

and if you are translating an article to English, you just copy the citation over to English Wikipedia with no change, translating the content, and leaving the French citation alone, exactly as it is in French.

This is a citation from the French article Lyon:

{{Lien web|langue=fr|url=https://www.lesechos.fr/pme-regions/auvergne-rhone-alpes/le-vieux-lyon-ou-les-dilemmes-dun-quartier-touristique-1227993|titre=Le Vieux Lyon ou les dilemmes d'un quartier touristique|auteur=Lea Delpont |année=2020|site=lesechos.fr|consulté le=2 août 2021}}

And if we just use that citation here in context, translating the French sentence fragment into English but without changing the French citation at all, here is what you get:

...and, as such, the districts of Old Lyon[1], of Fourvière Hill...

References

  1. ^ Lea Delpont (2020). "Le Vieux Lyon ou les dilemmes d'un quartier touristique". lesechos.fr (in French). Retrieved 2 August 2021..

Note that the French citation generates the correct reference here, and in English, because in English Wikipedia, {{Lien web}} is a template, and what it does is redirect to {{Cite web/French}}, which is a wrapper template you can read about, which generates the correct reference, and then waits for the CS1 translator module to recode the French citation into an English one, so it ends up as {{cite web|title=<French title>|year=2020...}} and so on.

Now just take the whole thing in the opposite direction, where you copy a {{cite web}} citation from English Wikipedia to French Wikipedia, and the French CS1 translator does the same thing over at fr-wiki, in the opposite direction, changing our {{cite web}} into their {{Lien web}}. They will need to add a |langue=en to the citation, if it doesn't already have one. Mathglot (talk) 03:50, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that. It's just the three languages for now that can use this system? I removed the script from my module, btw. Dawnseeker2000 03:54, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
About fourteen languages; some languages just have one or two translatable templates, and the core dozen or so have the big four—book, journal, web, news. See the list of supported templates. Mathglot (talk) 04:42, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


YOUR BIO SAYS ...I've been editing for a little over ten years..WOW IMPRESSIVE

[edit]

so why the rapid delete when I posted a barnstar for saying thank you for amazing work,..

my bad for saying thanks on a talk page to an editor who has made over five million edits with a bot..

just noticed a speedy delete you made on User talk:Citation bot this is one of the best bots..

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A well-deserved barnstar

[edit]
The Barnstar of Diligence
I hereby award to you this Barnstar of Diligence for your many, many excellent edits to clean up entries and improve readability. When I see your name on my watchlist, I always know, even before clicking, that you have made the encyclopedia better. Ssilvers (talk) 20:25, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks friend! Dawnseeker2000 22:36, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of NME covers for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of NME covers, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of NME covers (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

One of us deserves a trout on this one- who is it ?

[edit]

I understood it is normal to mention significant earthquakes that occur at a fault (or fault zone being in this case the Mendocino Fracture Zone) or eruptions at a volcano in the text especially if there is another article - that is the purpose of wikilinks. Justification for removal as you did would be if the event on the fault was not significant, or misplaced. Can I invite you to justify better, improve or revert. I am at the moment thinking this is a minor trout slap for one of us as I had actually considered reverting the poor initial edit and then thought that if I did someone else would come along and add it again given standard practice so I bothered improving matters with a source. My only comment on how you found when you edited it out was that I had assumed that anyone who knows their geography would know that west of the triple junction was this fracture zone but the next editor along had other ideas. ChaseKiwi (talk) 21:48, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Chase. I am OK with a trout slap if you like (and will lean into it a bit). I just think that adding embedded lists for those kinds of articles is kind of an amateur way of doing things. If there's something to say about the event, then fine. We just have so many lists of earthquakes. I linked to our California list in see also.
It's not clear at the moment if we'll even keep the article on this latest event. There are really quite a lot that are just like it (from that area) that we don't mention in the encyclopedia. Dawnseeker2000 23:41, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed. ChaseKiwi (talk) 00:10, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of tea for you!

[edit]
thank you for your contributions!! :) xRozuRozu • teacups 00:32, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gnosticism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Weber.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dawnseeker2000&oldid=1262319086"