Talk:SMS Brandenburg/GA1
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:42, 6 April 2010 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- The lede reads a little oddly towards the end. She spent her career in the Navy, but served in a limited capacity during the war.
- I removed the odd bit about the Imperial German Navy, that was a relic from the pre-expansion version. Parsecboy (talk) 20:29, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
- The lede reads a little oddly towards the end. She spent her career in the Navy, but served in a limited capacity during the war.
- B. MoS compliance:
- Need article title and place of pub for Cassier's Magazine and the article title for the United Service.
- Fixed. Parsecboy (talk) 20:29, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
- Need article title and place of pub for Cassier's Magazine and the article title for the United Service.
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- A little odd to read so much about the maneuvers, but what the heck.
- There's not much else to say about the ship other than what's already there, so I thought I'd include it. Parsecboy (talk) 20:29, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
- A little odd to read so much about the maneuvers, but what the heck.
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
