User talk:207.237.230.164

Please see my previous IP at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:38.109.88.180 , and

PLEASE READ MY WELCOME MESSAGE BELOW BEFORE POSTING HERE! THANK YOU! 207.237.230.164 (talk) 04:08, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to my Wikipage!

Please do not leave the "welcome" template here.

I do not want a wikiaccount. No, this is not a shared IP. All IP's deserve equal respect! Consider it a test of the concept of an encyclopedia "anyone" can edit. For more on this, please see WP:WAE.

While archiving is "preferred", there is no Wiki-rule saying blanking your user page is unacceptable, and as such, I usually keep this page clear. I will reply to messages left here on this page until an appropriate time, at which point the thread will be removed. Do not be offended.

Thank you and have a nice day! WP:LOVE!!! 207.237.230.164 (talk) 04:08, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Editing other's comments

It is generally considered impolite and improper to edit other's comments. I have warned you about this in the past, so you should be aware of this already. Please stop. Thanks. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 16:00, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It is a perfectly acceptable practice when the formatting of others' comments hinders Wikipedia functionality...which is the same consencus we came to last time. Please do not post to my talk page any more, which I have asked of you in the past. There is a dispute resolution process in place should you have any issue with my editing habits. 207.237.230.164 (talk) 17:05, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rusty Trombone for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 18:40, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

blocked

I've blocked you for 55 hours, anon only with no account creation prevention, because I'm not seeing any useful contributions from you, just disruptive behaviour on various internal pages. Get an account if you want to politick, or at least take some time off and change your approach. ++Lar: t/c 20:08, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

207.237.230.164 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am requesting to be unblocked for the following three reasons: *(1)- I have indeed made several useful contributions to Wikipedia, notably to Jeff Stryker and to Martin Ssempa, both of which were poorly sourced and long required attention before my attention to them. (Note that these articles may have been edited by me from one or both of my previous IP addresses [1] and [2], whose talk pages link clearly to the other to avoid any appearance of clandestine sockpuppetry. In this same topic, I know the current investigation of previous IP's will come up false, given how open I have been and continue to be with regard to my editing history...and, since that matter is not mentioned in this block, I hope it will not be taken into consideration here. Indeed, I hope to be unblocked in order to defend myself and clarify those accusations, as well as to get back to attending to content.) *(2)- I see no Wikipolicy that states that WP:WAE only applies to editing articles and not participating in "back-of-house" procedures...indeed, to welcome WAE but not encourage participation in internal pages seems oxymoronic and conflicting. *(3)- I do not believe my edits have been particularly disruptive. I have encouraged users (Delicious carbuncle, Hullabaloo Wolfowitz, and Bali ultimate, in particular) to begin proper dispute resolution procedures against me should me edits not be constructive to the project...none of whom have made any effort in this vein. I am eager to acquire new skills as an editor but can not move forward with this goal if I am prohibited from fully participating because I do not wish to have an account. 207.237.230.164 (talk) 04:14, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your request for unblock because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.

Please read our guide to appealing blocks for more information. -FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 05:07, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

207.237.230.164 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I do not think that any of my edits have been damaging or disruptive to Wikipedia. I do not see any WikiPolicy that I have violated, and I believe that my contributions have been useful. If, after reviewing my comments above, you disagree, you can keep me blocked. 55 hours is not that long.

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I do not think that any of my edits have been damaging or disruptive to Wikipedia.  I do not see any WikiPolicy that I have violated, and I believe that my contributions have been useful.  If, after reviewing my comments above, you disagree, you can keep me blocked.  55 hours is not that long. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I do not think that any of my edits have been damaging or disruptive to Wikipedia.  I do not see any WikiPolicy that I have violated, and I believe that my contributions have been useful.  If, after reviewing my comments above, you disagree, you can keep me blocked.  55 hours is not that long. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I do not think that any of my edits have been damaging or disruptive to Wikipedia.  I do not see any WikiPolicy that I have violated, and I believe that my contributions have been useful.  If, after reviewing my comments above, you disagree, you can keep me blocked.  55 hours is not that long. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.