Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danger Angel band

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nicely-written article, but non-notable according to WP:MUSIC. Relies heavily on own website as ref. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 09:03, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I'm not seeing it. Where is it relying heavily on the band's own website? I see a number of reviews referenced from many different places, which seems to strongly suggest notability to me. Silverseren^C 10:39, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 12:33, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I really cannot see which are the references coming from the band's own web site. All the references used are coming from reliable sources around the internet. There is not one single reference or note coming from the band's web site, except if you are referring to the external links which are NOT references. Some of the referenced media are of the most important media that deal with bands of such kind. Apart from that, it is obvious that this is a band with a certified international release by a certified label, the band includes one of the most well known artists of the genre (who is also cited inside wikipedia in more than one articles) plus one more well known musician also cited inside wikipedia in several cases (that makes two, complying to WP:MUSIC), the band is referenced in Billboard's web page and in Allmusic.com as well. There are several unbiased news items, reviews and interviews listed in this article. Alexpts(talk) 08:24, 22 April 2010 (UTC)Primary Author.keep[reply]