Talk:Peaches Geldof

Birthdate

The birthdate given here is highly dubious - according to most sources, Peaches Geldof is 16 years old, so she can't have been born in 1990 as the article states. AdorableRuffian 00:41, 17 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

There are other sources dating from 2004 which state she was 14, on there other hand. I couldn't find any sources to back up her birth date (of september 17 1990), and I find it unlikely that that was her date of birth because it would mean Paula Yates committed suicide on her daughter's birthday, and I'm sure that would have been written somewhere before now. By the way, some sources (ie. BBC news about Paula's death) state that Peaches was 10 when was she died. -- Joolz 01:51, 28 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Sex tape... no

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Peaches_Geldof&diff=21447497&oldid=21375952

I was guessing Peaches Geldof hadn't made a sex tape... and that was before I found no evidence supporting it on the web... Deskana 19:07, 20 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Jeremy Sumpter

The section of the article dealing with Peaches and Jeremy Sumpter seems incredibly dubious. A cursory google for various facts turns up very little regarding the situation and even less regarding Peaches' - er - sexual morality. Given the lack of even a tabloid article speculating on the 'relationship', the fact that Peaches has refused to discuss even the topic of sex ("Peaches doesn't talk much about [sex] (too embarrassing)", according to <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/gender/story/0,11812,1469020,00.html">The Guardian</a>) publically and that the only attribution for any of these charges are forums dedicated to Mr. Sumpter, can we assume that it's all a bit of slanderous rubbish?

Any comments before I get rid of the paragraphs? -idp

Citation needed

Several commentators in the British media have expressed "concern" about Peaches' revealing outfits and party lifestyle

Which commentators? - Ta bu shi da yu 02:46, 24 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Recent changes as of 25/10/05

Changes to the article were made, namely a revert to the content that included Jeremy Sumpter, which was removed due to it being not enclyclopedic and/or doubted information. I reverted these... I hope there are no objections. Not only that, but things such as the article being stubbed correctly were lost... thus my revert. Deskana 21:50, 25 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Simply not worthy of an entry

She is Sir Bob's daughter and has a column with a national newspaper. So what. This entry simply does not merit inclusion on such limited grounds. It should be merged with the entry on Bob Geldof.

So hop to it. → Ξxtreme Unction {yak yak yak ł blah blah blah}

Surely needs more content and to be rewritten?

I'm not sure what Peaches has done with her life but perhaps details of her early life should be in the article, rather than speculation about "suggestive comments" at Live 8?

Would a photo be possible if she is under 18? Or are there legal issues (other than copyright)? James.kendall 22:18, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Newspaper reports Wiki Vandalism as fact!

A British tabloid paper, the Daily Mail has published an article about why Peaches Geldof hates her name.[1]

But they've falsely copied her name as it was on here for several months until corrected. Look at the page history before December 9th. Uberisaac 19:43, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]