User talk:Xeno

Notes:

I will usually reply where original comments occurred and add notifications if thought necessary.
You may email me regarding anything sensitive, private, or confidential.
I work for or provide services to the Wikimedia Foundation, but this is my personal account. Edits, statements, or other contributions made from this account are my own, and may not reflect the views of the Foundation.
Feel free to post a message or ask a question. Please be sure to [[wikilink]] appropriate subjects. Thanks for visiting!

click here to leave a new message...

Archives

2008 /02 /03 /04 /05 /06 /07 /08 /09 /10 /11 /12 2009 /01/02 /03/04 /05 /06 /07 /08 /09 /10 /11/12 2010 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 2011 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
2012–2013 A1 2014 A2 2015 A3 2016–2019 A4
2020– A5

This page has archives. Sections may be automatically archived by .

This user really enjoys dark and stormy nights.

bot's turn, soon...

WT:ACTOR#search and replace patterns

I floated an objections-check there three days ago, and there are none. I also note this comment by WHL, which is accepting of the notion. I believe this is fine to proceed with. Let me know if you'd like me to dig up more examples or if I can otherwise help. Cheers, Jack Merridew 22:59, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just going to put a fake future timestamp to keep this here for a while. –xeno^talk 04:20, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just wondering...

What "comments at the village pump" that I made led you to your oppose at my RfA? Immunize (talk) 17:48, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't oppose, I was neutral. If I recall correctly, it was because of your tendency to make or support obviously unsuitable proposals. –xeno^talk 18:15, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mono

User talk:Mono#Fake signatures — beginning to not appreciate your access list decision here.... --MZMcBride (talk) 15:45, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mmm...indeed. Let me know if you'd like me to revoke. –xeno^talk 18:12, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Revoked per their response. –xeno^talk 00:50, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cool, thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 02:40, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Red Sox template

Hey. I noticed that you asked Koavf about fixing the messes with the template from a year ago back in February. I've been trying to fix what I can (manually of course, nearly all of the mid-importance tags are invalid that I'm seeing). Would you be able to get me an updated list of any baseball articles that still have two baseball templates on the talk page? I can knock them out in a couple days, I'm tired of still seeing things double templated with different assessments and importances. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 20:20, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sure can. I'll have them for you in the morning. –xeno^talk 22:47, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[1] There y'ar. Thanks for volunteering to clean these up. –xeno^talk 01:20, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Email

Wondering how do you get someones email address (if they don't mind you having it) as I need to reacquire User:Malke 2010's email but she might not respond for sometime. Is there even a way to do so? 'The Ninjalemming'' 17:16, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No, unless they tell it to you or reply to an email you send via Special:EmailUser/Malke 2010. –xeno^talk 17:19, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sent an email there so am waiting for a response, thanks though. 'The Ninjalemming'' 17:41, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]