File appears to be an picture of... a picture. Compare this image and the revision before that to this image at IMDb, which is copyright to Wire Image. I studied the images carefully for several minutes, looking at several details to attempt to find some difference (aside from quality). I've concluded that the picture here on Wikipedia and the one on IMDb are one and the same. The file was previously nominated for deletion at the 2008 July 11 FFD and was closed as keep and assuming good faith on the uploader's part. Unfortunately, I do not believe the author's claim as copyright holder after finding absolutely no difference from this uploaded file and the image copyrighted by Wire Image. — ξxplicit 01:26, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
As above, I suspect this file is a picture of a picture. I can't find the exact source to this image, but after reviewing the user's deleted contributions, I believe it came from this website. Administrators can see that this file was deleted as a copyright violation. However, compare the image on the website to the deleted one. As it's very well clear, the deleted file was manipulated and rotated horizontally to make it seem as if it's not the exact same image, though it clearly was. It's not clear that the file being nominated today appears to have gone through similar treatment, but it seems evident that this is not the uploader's own work. — ξxplicit 01:43, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
As the two files above uploaded by the exact same user, this file appears to be a picture of a picture or television screen. Because of this, I have reason to believe this is not the uploader's own work. — ξxplicit 01:45, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This is quite obviously a scan of a printed image. et it is labled as own work AND a has a random webpage given as source (where there in addition is no proof of the GFDL license) 94.193.242.248 (talk) 04:27, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Book/magazine cover of some sort. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILYsock(TALK) 06:17, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Book/magazine cover of some sort. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILYsock(TALK) 06:17, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Tineye finds some lower-resolution versions of this image being used on a poll somewhere. Metadata seems to suggest it was taken from somewhere on the web and modified, but I cannot find an original source. (ESkog)(Talk) 13:30, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
TineEye search (might require you to run another search) suggests this image is taken from another website. Mosmof (talk) 14:25, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
