User talk:Coramandel23

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:Narsapurlutheran.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:IMG 1372.JPG. The copy called Image:IMG 1372.JPG has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 01:59, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

May 2010

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for block evasion and continued sockpuppetry. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Elockid ^(Talk) 04:42, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Coramandel23 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The reason I was creating new accounts was because every account I created was being blocked, this is despite the fact that I have been making significant contributions to the talk page and discussion through my so called "socks". I have also refrained from any type of edit warring. I hope the administrators will take an uninterested stand and promote divergent view points. Please unblock at least one account. I have much to contribute to wikipedia. Thank you

Decline reason:

That does not excuse dodging your block, regardless of the merits of it. The proper recourse in that case would have been to file an unblock request, not create a sock (since the latter tends to destroy, or at the very least badly damage, any hope of getting yourself unblocked). —Jeremy ^{(v^_^v Dittobori)} 06:46, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Coramandel23 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was not aware of this. I am a new user-I was online since 2007 but I only started contributing recently. Unfortunately I chose a very controversial subject. So please consider it once again

Decline reason:

When you created your very first account, you were required to confirm that you read and understood the username policy, and the WP:MULTIPLE section is part of that policy. WP:EVADE now applies - and if you had read WP:GAB when first blocked, you would have known that too. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:24, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Coramandel23 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

What are my other options if you are not willing to unblock even a single account? How will I ever be able to edit Wikipedia?

Decline reason:

Ok, let's break this down:

Stop evading your original block by creating new accounts
Go back to your original account and add an unblock request to it's talk page
If you are blocked from doing that, send an email to arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org explaining your situation.
Given that you have created multiple accounts, you may want to consider the standard offer to blocked users as an avenue to getting unblocked eventually. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:43, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is asking that his block be reviewed:

Coramandel23 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is my original account. As I already mentioned two of my accounts were created in 2007 and I do not even remember the password. I have not engaged in any sort of vandalism. The only reason I was blocked was because I created multiple accounts from a single IP address over a period of time

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=This is my original account. As I already mentioned two of my accounts were created in 2007 and I do not even remember the password. I have not engaged in any sort of vandalism. The only reason I was blocked was because I created multiple accounts from a single IP address over a period of time |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=This is my original account. As I already mentioned two of my accounts were created in 2007 and I do not even remember the password. I have not engaged in any sort of vandalism. The only reason I was blocked was because I created multiple accounts from a single IP address over a period of time |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=This is my original account. As I already mentioned two of my accounts were created in 2007 and I do not even remember the password. I have not engaged in any sort of vandalism. The only reason I was blocked was because I created multiple accounts from a single IP address over a period of time |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Blocking admin comment: 'Please read WP:Sockpuppetry with regards to having other accounts. Legitimate alternate accounts are acceptable, however, it seems that you haven't used them legitimately. 2 of your socks, more specifically Kariappa07 and Centaurcentral were used to deceptively edit Christianity in India which were all edit warring by the way. You then created Reginaldsk to block evade and further your agenda on the same exact article. Which accounts are you talking about that were created in 2007? Currently, we know 2, this account and Sikolia07. Unless you have other accounts that we do not know of, you clearly did not forgot the password as evident in the recent contributions. If you do have other accounts, it would be best to disclose them. You were not blocked just for creating multiple accounts, you were blocked for persistent misuse of them and edit warring. Elockid ^(Talk) 19:06, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that his block be reviewed:

Coramandel23 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have only engaged in edit warring in one instance and I really would like to contribute further to Wikipedia. Please consider all the contributions and new articles that I have initiated. I admit that I have erred but don't everybody deserve a chance

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I have only engaged in edit warring in one instance and I really would like to contribute further to Wikipedia. Please consider all the contributions and new articles that I have initiated. I admit that I have erred but don't everybody deserve a chance |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I have only engaged in edit warring in one instance and I really would like to contribute further to Wikipedia. Please consider all the contributions and new articles that I have initiated. I admit that I have erred but don't everybody deserve a chance |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I have only engaged in edit warring in one instance and I really would like to contribute further to Wikipedia. Please consider all the contributions and new articles that I have initiated. I admit that I have erred but don't everybody deserve a chance |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}