Jump to content

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Haiduc/Archive

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations‎ | Haiduc

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Spitfire (talk | contribs) at 16:47, 6 June 2010 (Archive oldest case to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Tonalone/Archive instead). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)



Haiduc

Haiduc (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Report date March 12 2010, 22:08 (UTC)[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets [edit]


Evidence submitted by Hipocrite [edit]

Obvious not-new user shows up after having been slept for years and starts adding details on a famous persons pederasty? Quack?


Comments by accused parties [edit]

See Defending yourself against claims.


Comments by other users [edit]
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments [edit]
Checkuser request – code letter: A (Arbcom ban/sanction evasion )
Current status – Completed: Reviewed by a Checkuser, results and comments are below.    Requested by Hipocrite (talk) 22:08, 12 March 2010 (UTC) [reply]

 Clerk endorsed, this is unlikely to be a new user. Tim Song (talk) 06:03, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Seems Red X Unrelated to Haiduc, but Pdruknl does appear to be sharing a computer with other new users Willie2001 (talk · contribs) and Prince6309 (talk · contribs), and quite probably on proxies. Hersfold (t/a/c) 17:10, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

They're completely different edit patterns, and Prince6309 is completely inconclusive on behavior. No action taken at this time. –MuZemike 18:55, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically.
22 May 2010[edit]
Suspected sockpuppets [edit]


Evidence submitted by Tonalone [edit]

Since creation of this account on April 14, this user has made a grand total of three edits (the other two edits on April 29 and May 11), all which were comments on my talk page requsting that I restore material that I deleted from a banned user (the suspected sock puppet). This account was created with the sole purpose of communicating with me under an identity I would not recognize.--Tonalone (talk) 04:42, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by accused parties [edit]

See Defending yourself against claims.


Comments by other users [edit]
Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments [edit]
Checkuser request – code letter: A (Arbcom ban/sanction evasion )
Current status – Completed: Reviewed by a Checkuser, results and comments are below.    Requested by Tonalone (talk) 04:42, 22 May 2010 (UTC) [reply]

 Clerk note: moved from Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MelodiousEros, please see there for original history. SpitfireTally-ho! 17:08, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Checkuser note: Red X Unrelated; they are from different continents. No other likely socks on the IP range. Risker (talk) 04:23, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]


This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Haiduc/Archive&oldid=366392512"