User talk:AmericaIsNumberOne

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Montana's Defender

Per the above SPI, SocalBill09 (talk · contribs), AmericaIsNumberOne (talk · contribs) and Montana's Defender (talk · contribs) are confirmed to be the same person. In lieu of an indefinite block on all three accounts, I'm requiring you to pick one account and stick with it. To ensure compliance, the other two accounts will be blocked indefinitely. Further, you must clearly disclose the link between the three accounts, by, for instance, redirecting the other two accounts' user page/talk pages. Pending receipt of a response, I'm blocking all three accounts indefinitely. Once you have made a decision as to what account you will continue to use, you can use {{unblock|reason}} on that account's talk page. Tim Song (talk) 15:18, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|I picked AmericaIsNumberOne i only changed because i don't like people watching every edit i make bad or good.}}

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

This account is unblocked. Please make sure the other two accounts are visibly linked to this one and stick to this account from now on.

Request handled by: Tim Song (talk)

Unblocking administrator: Please check for active autoblocks on this user after accepting the unblock request.

Having your editing history open to all is a part of the open, free, shared nature of this project. If you want to be here, you just have to deal with it. That said, if someone in particular is singling you out using your edit history, you there are guidelines to help you deal with Wikistalking. --WikidSmaht (talk) 11:05, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked again

I have blocked you again, this time for a full month. It is clear that you are only going to edit without discussion here. This revert shows this clearly. However, if you look at this list of her awards, you'll see that Pippo is correct. You need to understand that Wikipedia is a collaborative effort. You need to talk about your edits. You cannot just keep pressing the undo blindly and not explaining why you do what you do. When your block expires, please make a better effort to discuss your edits. Thank you, either way (talk) 03:13, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that his block be reviewed:

AmericaIsNumberOne (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I did not know plus i dont watch MTV

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I did not know plus i dont watch MTV |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I did not know plus i dont watch MTV |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I did not know plus i dont watch MTV |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}