Jump to content

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Simulation12

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by FETCH! With Ruff Ruffman (talk | contribs) at 03:17, 27 June 2010 (Comments by other users). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

FetchFan21

FetchFan21 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)
Please note that a case was originally opened under Simulation12 (talk · contribs) but has been moved to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/FetchFan21. Future cases should be placed under Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/FetchFan21.


Prior SSP or RFCU cases may exist for this user:

25 June 2010


Suspected sockpuppets
Evidence submitted by Checker Fred

User:MuZemike thinks User:FetchFan21 is a sock of User:Simulation12. I do not think that is the case.

I have known him for awhile and he is not a sock of that account. The first edit war he had was more of an disagreement. He saw a video on somewhere and just put that would be the opening for season 5 as well. Also that made a little more sence after he found out Season 5 of FETCH! is the final season according to WGBH Boston, due to lack of funding. Also a recent edit he did AussieLegend tended to agree in several accepts. He was just reverting those edits from vandals. I don't really think he is a sock. I have looked through the edits of Simulation12 and they really don't match up. the user editing The FETCH pages was just trying to be helpful. I would like a checkuser to look into this further.

User:Hidividedby5 just looks a little suspicious and reminds of sock User:CNGLITCHINFO a little bit. her edits are not constructive and a bit of vandalism. Also a bit of threats on the FETCH with Ruff Ruffman pages. Can you look into this person. Thanks.

Also I did want to point out that FetchFan21 does not realy now kow to use the unblock templete and where the socks of Simulation12 do know how to use it.Checker Fred (talk) 23:25, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I just can arcoss User:Anakinimanand his edits are similar to Simulation12. Also he has been in a little edit war on the FETCH with Ruff Ruffman page. Can we just get a check on this user as well. Checker Fred (talk) 23:22, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by accused parties

See Defending yourself against claims.

that was not really an edit war. it was more of an disagreement. I saw a video on somewhere and just put that would be the opening for season 5 as well. Also that made a little more sence after I found out Season 5 of FETCH! is the final season according to WGBH Boston, due to lack of funding. Also a recent edit I did AussieLegend tended to agree in several accepts. --FetchFan21 (talk) 16:45, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

There is something fishy going on here. [1] suspects FetchFan21 of being a sock, and now that has been completely reneged above. In any case, I still stand by my suspicion and block, as already explained before. –MuZemike 18:03, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with the above concerns that there's something fishy going on and since the accusation is that FetchFan21 is a sock of User:Simulation12, it's worth referencing the Simulation 12 SPI cases, with particular note of my comments at the most recent one, which I stand by regardless of the confusing, but not unexpected, CU results.[2] --AussieLegend (talk) 23:20, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hold the case FetchFan21 is innocent allow me to introduce myself I am Ruff Ruffman the host of the PBS Kids Show FETCH! With Ruff Ruffman. I've been checking up on his edits and he's doing a great job with the page. I don't why anybody would accuse FetchFan for some sock he edits fine and he actually found out from our producers that Season 5 of FETCH! will be the final season. So whoever framed FetchFan21 should unblock him please. --FETCH! With Ruff Ruffman (talk) 03:17, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

{{RFCU}} is deprecated. Please change the case status parameter in {{SPI case status}} to "CURequest" instead.

Checkuser request – code letter: CODE LETTER (Unknown code )
Current status – Endorsed for Checkuser attention.    Requested by Checker Fred (talk) 17:28, 25 June 2010 (UTC) [reply]

 Clerk endorsed Something weird is going on here. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 16:13, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]