User talk:Ktr101

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
User Talk Contribs Sandbox Userboxes Awards New pages Humor E-mail Logs

Page moves

Uploads

User Talk Contribs Sandbox Userboxes Awards New pages Humor E-mail Logs Moves Uploads
Archive
Archives

October 2007-September 2008
October 2008-September 2009
October 2009-September 2010
October 2010-September 2011
October 2011-September 2012
October 2012-September 2013
October 2013-September 2014
October 2014-Present


Contents

revised (now properly cited) article for JERRY MASTERS[edit]

Hi Kevin,

I hope this message finds you doing well in the New Year. I recently submitted an article about a musician and recording engineer named Jerry Masters. You were kind enough to initially review the article for submission. It was declined on basis of not proper/not enough citation basis. I have worked hard to add the adequate number of references from various credible sources along with historic photography. There are now 9 cited sources pertaining to each paragraph.

I am a journalist and music business historian based in Alabama and some of my work covers the rich history of recording music arts and heritage in the South and this state in particular. Im a greenhorn novice as regards Wikipedia, so I appreciate your letting me know about the deficiency in citations being an issue. I was a bit lazy in dealing with a historical personage and sometimes I have to admit I get "tunnel vision" in writing about music and take for granted/assume that everyone has already heard of many of the people I write about. hahah. Sorry about that.

At any rate, I have got some solid citational references in there now, so at your convenience if you could let me know if all things look up to speed now for a re-submission, I'd greatly appreciate it. The newly edited/updated draft is saved in my sandbox for review.

I know you guys are busy, and I appreciate your volunteer work as a contributing editor to the Wikipedia cause. It's exciting to join the family. I hope that over time, I'll get more used to the process on submission.

best,

dkharrismusicwrites — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dkharrismusicwrites (talkcontribs) 03:04, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

That looks a lot better, as I am pondering writing more about Muscle Shoals in the future, once I figure out more of the history and am able to figure out the timeline a bit more. Good luck! Kevin Rutherford (talk) 02:48, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 7[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Hilliard Greene
added links pointing to Brian Morton and Richard Cook
Eglin Air Force Base Railroad
added a link pointing to Camp Polk

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of George N. Parks[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article George N. Parks you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of 3family6 -- 3family6 (talk) 03:21, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Abigail Adams House[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Abigail Adams House has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG without reliable independent sourcing

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TM 11:29, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Henry F. Hills House North[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Henry F. Hills House North has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG without independent sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TM 11:30, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Henry F. Hills House South[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Henry F. Hills House South has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG without independent sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TM 11:30, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sarah L. Arnold House[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Sarah L. Arnold House has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG without independent sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TM 11:31, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Southwest (North) Dormitory III[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Southwest (North) Dormitory III has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG without independent sources. Building was not completed.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TM 11:32, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Query[edit]

Why? Jim Carter 13:18, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Because they are not dead and are still quite active on the site. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 21:59, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
LOL :) Jim Carter 04:23, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Request on 17:22:59, 10 January 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by 75.141.236.112[edit]


Kevin, thank you for your review of Kent Philpott.

I respectfully disagree with your determination and I offer the following additional explanation in argument for this.

On myself, which is not part of the page. I was an atheist, and had no knowledge that the Jesus people Movement existed, let alone what an awakening was. I thought Billy Graham was misguided at best, having heard him once at a rally in South Africa. I am today one of the authorities on Operation Savannah - in particular the battle of Luso. Angola 1975/76 - a CIA operation to stop the advance of communism.

http://operationsavannah.com/preface

I publish web sites on various social issues, like energy efficiency - http://open4energy.com - and write on the use of chemicals in the dental industry. If you google the term "bischoff chemical dental" - you will see an article I wrote for the #1 publication to the dental industry.

After 25 years as an alcoholic, I was helped to get sober, and on 10th October 2001 accepted Jesus. Today I am a student of PTSD and alcoholism, in particular how AA and a spiritual awakening has changed the face of alcoholism. It was in researching the history of "awakenings" that I discovered the spiritual and historical importance of the Jesus People Movement" - It is my generation that are recognizing how drugs and alcohol, which were the medication for PTSD and the Emotional Injuries of the Vietnam war. Sadky, we are repeating teh same mistake, as we see 10 young people commit suicide every day as a result of trauma this past 10 years and the gulf war.

This wiki page, is much more to me that a history on Philpott. It is how we expose our younger generation to the past, and to not make the same mistakes.

Before I start adding more information (there are 100's of references that could be added) (I wanted to begin with quality and not quantity) here is why I believe that the Movement is an important event (it is referenced on Wiki) - Philpott meets the definition for a person of "note" - and the citations meet the standard for independent authority.

I will of course add more information, and as many more citations as you require. Although, looking at pages on other people of note. I have found the to be less complete, for a more minor event, for a person with a more minor role, and citation of more minor authority than a PHD study by the authority on the subject.

Eskridge published the book God's Family Forever. The appendix to the book is the reference material for his doctoral thesis on the movement. He is now the accepted authority on the Jesus people Movement. He is on staff at Wheaton College, has been since 1988.

He affirms the importance I attribute to the movement.

i) "was one of the most important American religious movements of the second half of the 20th century." ii) "is one of the formative powers that shaped American youth in the late 1960's and 1970's." iii) "Calvary Chapel (Chuck Smith) and the Vineyard churches trace their roots to the Jesus People Movement"

He states that Philpott as the person who introduced Christianity (what grew into the movement) to San Francisco. (citation made)

He further accredits Philpott as the person who preached the Gospel to Hoyt. Literally saved from the fire in the temple. Hoyt is in the late stages of releasing his book. I have interviewed Hoyt, who after being born again, together with Philpott went on to establish the communities that saved 1000's of young people from the drug culture and abuse that was taking place.

Hoyt, was drawn away, to be a founder of the "Children of God (http://www.vice.com/read/the-bizarre-and-terrifying-propaganda-art-of-the-children-of-god-666) - lost his family, and almost his life before seeing his error, and rebuilding his life.

Hoyt could be seen as #2 of the movement. I am planning to develop a page for him also when his book is released.

The citation I have placed to Eskridge is the most authoritative that can exist.

Eskridge wrote the forward to Philpott's memoir - Memoirs of a Jesus Freak - saying "Memoirs of a Jesus Freak is an important, first hand, reminiscence about those pivotal early days... helpful to scholars, pastors and lay people as they reflect on the past.

I offer that that the material in Philpott's memoir, although written by him, can be considered authoritative by the introduction from the subject authority.

The memoir includes photographs, accounts of the music, the preaching, the leaders, the communities and the cults that developed later.

I hope that you will reconsider, or let me know what additional information you require.

Alex

75.141.236.112 (talk) 17:22, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

I'm still not seeing notability here, so feel free to re-submit it again and someone else can look at it. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 02:48, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Mary Ann Rhodes (supercentenarian)[edit]

Hi Ktr101, I just wanted to let you know that I speedily deleted an article that you recently moved out of AfC, Mary Ann Rhodes (supercentenarian) by criteria G4, as Rhodes was deemed insufficiently notable for Wikipedia by consensus and a deletion debate and the new article did not address the concerns that were raised in the discussion. Wikipedia has had a lot of difficulty with longevity-related articles in the past that culminated in an Arbcom case, and there are still issues from time to time regarding such articles' adherence to Wikipedia's policies. In any case, I just wanted to leave a quick message, since I'm not in the habit of deleting things without some explanation. 00:51, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

No problem, as I was completely unaware of that case until now and will remember it in the future when I am reviewing articles such as that! Kevin Rutherford (talk) 02:48, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Night Will Fall[edit]

Well done for creating the film's WP entry! My father (Leonard Berney, a Belsen liberator) appears in the film - hence my interest. I just tweeted you from @uptone.Johnalexwood (talk) 15:21, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

No problem, and I am glad to have helped! Kevin Rutherford (talk) 02:48, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Copyright infringements found on George N. Parks[edit]

Hi Kevin! My review for George N. Parks found at least two copyright infringements in the article. This needs to get fixed ASAP, or else I will have to not only quickfail the article but delete all possibly infringing content.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 21:26, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

the xkcd barnstar[edit]

Stick Figure.jpg the xkcd barnstar
Congratulations, Kevin, you are the inaugural winner of the xkcd barnstar. Awarded to users who appropriately and insightfully reference any xkcd comic in a Wikipedia discussion. (The one about "somebody is wrong on the internet" doesn't count, though, because it's applicable to every single discussion on WP.) Anyway, thanks, I laughed and it made a valid point. --Floquenbeam (talk) 23:56, 12 January 2015 (UTC)}
Thanks, as I now feel a bit honored by this accomplishment! Kevin Rutherford (talk) 02:48, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

ITN for 2015 Mozambique funeral beer poisoning[edit]

--SpencerT♦C 06:29, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated[edit]

Hi, I'm Woohookitty. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, 2015 Mozambique funeral beer poisoning, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. User:Woohookitty Disamming fool! 07:45, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of George N. Parks[edit]

The article George N. Parks you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold Symbol wait.svg. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:George N. Parks for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of 3family6 -- 3family6 (talk) 17:20, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Alliance Global Group for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alliance Global Group is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alliance Global Group (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —BarrelProof (talk) 18:54, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of George N. Parks[edit]

The article George N. Parks you nominated as a good article has passed Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:George N. Parks for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of 3family6 -- 3family6 (talk) 15:41, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Miss India USA[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Miss India USA requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://missindiaflorida.weebly.com/uploads/2/7/8/8/27880907/miss_india_florida_2014_sponsorship_packet.pdf. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Legacypac (talk) 11:27, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CVI, January 2015[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:27, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Original Barnstar Hires.png The Original Barnstar
Hi there! I'm a Wikipedian who's been editing for about two years now. I was looking back at the very first edits I made, and I noticed that you happened to review my very first article at AfC. It really encouraged me to continue editing Wikipedia, and I've had a nice time here. So, I just wanted to say thank you for that. Bananasoldier (talk) 07:30, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Barnstar for you![edit]

InTheNews Barnstar.png The In The News Barnstar
Thanks for creating multiple air crash articles that made it to ITN section. OhanaUnitedTalk page 20:56, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Commons[edit]

Can you please respond to several outstanding issues at your Wikimedia Commons talk page. Thanks in advance. Nick (talk) 16:34, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Alternately, you might want to refer them onto the WMF as further evidence of the serious dysfunction there (especially the bureaucrat springing to the defence of a globally banned editor, and publicly linking to private correspondence they've posted). Nick-D (talk) 23:04, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Draft: Centre of Excellence for Operations in Confined and Shallow Waters[edit]

Dear Kevin, thank you for reviewing my article on the COE CSW. I added more references and literature and would be glad if you would look at it again and if you are happy accept it. Thank you! seabas57 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Seabas57 (talkcontribs) 15:23, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Reviewed, and thanks for your work! Kevin Rutherford (talk) 17:19, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Aero & Tech Nexth[edit]

Hello Ktr101 I see that you are dealing with issues involved with Aero & Tech Nexth, I appreciate you cant discuss your dealing but the person claiming to be the aircraft designer keeps removing cited material and adding marketing and unreferenced material. Its probably getting near the point where the article needs to be protected against these edits by somebody with clear conflict of interest. Some of the recent press clippings added by the user have not supported the claims made. It must be a simple thing for the owner/designer to update the company website or press releases and provide reliable references that can be verified. If they think anything is factual wrong but cited then it should be easy to bring them up on the article talk page or remove any unreferenced facts. It is in all are interests to get the best information and source we can find but patience gets a bit thin when we are at the point of disruptive editing. Thanks. MilborneOne (talk) 19:11, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

@MilborneOne: I have actually gone ahead and responded to them right now, so I will let you know once they get back to me. I did send them a note that stated that they need to abide by the neutral point of view, so lets hope this fixes it. If not, I am fully-supportive of reverting the page back to what it was before they started. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 19:18, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Prader scale[edit]

Ha - thank you!! :) I'd actually forgotten about that article. I'll put a little work into cleaning it up and adding images, sources, etc. - Alison 21:11, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

No problem! I was cleaning through the Drafts namespace and clearing out some of the vandalism, when I came upon one of the few drafts that had hope. It looks good, and I cannot wait to see the finished product! Kevin Rutherford (talk) 21:16, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Stockton University[edit]

Please stop changing this until after the name change and the article move have gone through.Naraht (talk) 03:20, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Seeing as they are renaming tonight, I am planning on moving it soon. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 03:21, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

re The Richard Stockton College of New Jersey: Not sure if that is the best way to carry out that change, but if you are very sure about this then okay. 野狼院ひさし u/t/c 04:17, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

As I'm going to move it soon, I just decided to create the conflicts now and move it soon to fix them, since I don't want to have a bunch of double redirects occurring during the day in its main timezone. At this point, all I need to do is move and format the main page, which will happen soon. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 04:24, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Stockton[edit]

I hope you didn't go and revert everything that you have changed in regards to the Stockton University, as that was not my intent. As I mentioned on the college talk page, it is much appreciated and makes since to do so. It was just the main article that I didn't think needed changed, but decided that it makes more since after I heard your thoughts on it. I also said that because I don't know much about categories, that was on thing I was glad you did! I did revert my edit on the main article, which you can revert if you think otherwise. Have a good day. Corkythehornetfan | Chat? 05:30, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Hey Corkythehornetfan, I actually went right to be after that, but I wanted to make sure that didn't happen so I left a note there saying just that. I'll be sure to monitor their communications pages tonight to see when they rename, although I won't object if you move it first. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 21:29, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
Okay... the university has already updated the website so the page can be moved. I'll update the logos, as well. What else needs updated? Corkythehornetfan | Chat? 22:32, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
I moved the logos last night, but I think the only thing that needs fixing is the double redirects, and making sure that no other pages are going to have issues in terms of grammar. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 22:34, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
Sounds good. Bots should fix the double redirects, right? I'll look to see what other pages link to RSCofNJ. Corkythehornetfan | Chat? 22:51, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
They can, or you can just go through and revert my edits from last night, and set it so that there are no double redirects going on. In terms of the other pages, you might be able to set up AutoWikiBrowser to have another run if you have access to that, as that is how I made the majority of my edits during the first run. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 22:53, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
I don't have access to the AWB and by looking at the page, I don't think it works with Safari... Thanks for the suggestion, though!
As for the SU articles, I think I've got a majority of it done. Thanks for the help and head start yesterday! Corkythehornetfan | Chat? 00:13, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
No problem, and I am glad to make the school less of a mouthful for people to say! Kevin Rutherford (talk) 01:01, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Walkendorff declined[edit]

Dear Ktr101,

I am just starting out as a contributor on Wikipedia, so please bear with me. You recently declined the page at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Walkendorff. I am in fact attempting to translate the existing article about this family on the Swedish Wikipedia article, available at https://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walkendorff.

I realise now that perhaps I should have created a stub article and then tag it with a translation template, as outlined here? The content and references used would be taken from the original Swedish page.

I would be much grateful for any advice. Perpetual Tourist (talk) 22:07, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CVII, February 2015[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:50, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Keepers of the Streak[edit]

Symbol question.svg Hello! Your submission of Keepers of the Streak at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Miyagawa (talk) 21:03, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Waterparks draft[edit]

Is there anything public you can point me at with respect to the "paid editing debacle" you mention here? And will you be offended if the G13 tag and your decline remain deleted when I history merge this draft with the other one and the version in mainspace? (They're the only two interleaved edits.) —Cryptic 01:00, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Essentially, one company created the draft, another editor who impersonated one an administrator offered to create the article, and then charged the company to build the same article using the draft. I don't know if they went through with it, but I am going to assume that the editor (who also sent information to another company), is a paid editor and a checkuser should eventually be run for the user. Go ahead and merge them though, as I will not object. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 01:30, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Borghild Project[edit]

Create job in adding the hoax part. I was completely unaware of that. I intend to do a GA-expansion and improvement of the article. I'll let you know when I'm done if you wish to do some copyedits or add something. Best, Jonas Vinther • (speak to me!) 17:57, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

No problem, as I actually started to write it as a fact, and then started to find the hoax part and decided to fully flesh-out the text, to make it more substantial. Let me know when you start the process as well, as I found a good amount of text online and really only skimmed it when writing the article. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 23:09, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Basaltic Prisms of Santa María Regla[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Basaltic Prisms of Santa María Regla, and it appears to include material copied directly from https://www.flickr.com/photos/freg/6212859330/.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 04:17, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Valhalla train crash[edit]

Coffee // have a cup // beans // 23:11, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

New train derailment[edit]

You originally created the 2015 Mount Carbon train derailment article, which I have collaborated on. Now, this was a major, new accident. Want to collaborate with me on a new article? "A BNSF oil train derails in a rural area near Galena, Illinois. Twenty-one of the 105 cars, containing Bakken formation crude oil, leave the track and catch fire, which continues to burn. No injuries are reported. ref: cite web|url=http://news.yahoo.com/train-carrying-bakken-crude-derails-burns-illinois-062821405.html%7Ctitle=Railway now says 21 cars derailed from oil train in Illnois|work=Yahoo! News |publisher= |date= 6 March 2015 |accessdate=6 March 2015" (quoted ref, minus brackets)Juneau Mike (talk) 02:32, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

Hey Michaelh2001! I have gone ahead and created the article here, so feel free to expand upon it when you have a moment! Kevin Rutherford (talk) 00:50, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
ktr101 Hi there. I did some house keeping on the article, mostly to its title, and to the categories. I had to make a small "move" because there is only one "L" in Galena. I am going to wait a day or two and let others expand on the article before I jump. I don't want to hog the page lol. :) Let me know when you jump in. Thanks! Juneau Mike (talk) 00:10, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

2015 Gallena train derailment[edit]

Yes, lets collaborate on this. It should get expanded right away, or it will draw the AfD PD. I've done some light house keeping, but the prose is very elementary. Lets get this done! :) Juneau Mike (talk) 06:23, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

New article I created today[edit]

2015 Halifax train crash I know you will be busy with 2015 Galena train derailment, which you created, but take a peak at "my" new article. Thanks Juneau Mike (talk) 02:37, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

Looks good, so keep up the good work! Kevin Rutherford (talk) 03:48, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Southwest (North) Dormitory III[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Southwest (North) Dormitory III has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unbuilt college dorm. No outside sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hirolovesswords (talk) 03:36, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Southwest (North) Dormitory III for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Southwest (North) Dormitory III is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Southwest (North) Dormitory III until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hirolovesswords (talk) 04:18, 17 March 2015 (UTC)


Template:Did you know nominations/Borghild Project[edit]

Could you polish this article a bit so the nomination to proceed? Abyssal (talk) 16:15, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Bay Line Railroad[edit]

I wonder if you might weigh in at Talk:Bay Line Railroad#Article split? Thanks, Mackensen (talk) 00:46, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Keepers of the Streak[edit]

Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:02, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CVIII, March 2015[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:36, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for voting![edit]

Thank you for voting on the Talk:Germanwings Flight 9525 debate whether Andreas Lubitz should merge with Germanwings Flight 9525. By the way, your talk page is epic! CookieMonster755 (talk) 21:06, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Cape Cod Road Transportation[edit]

{{Cape Cod Road Transportation}} has been nominated for deletion. Please feel free to comment at the discussion. Imzadi 1979  11:56, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

Battle for Outpost Vegas DYK Nomination[edit]

Hello, I changed the dyk/article according to your review. Is it good by your book? Thanks, Jdanbeck (talk) 16:46, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

Rv of move during an open WP:RM[edit]

I have reverted you move of the article Aston Science Park to Birmingham Science Park Aston because there is an open RM on the talk page see talk:Aston Science Park#Requested move 13 April 2015. The appropriate thing to do is express you support for a move there, with the alternative title to which you moved the article, if you think that appropriate. -- PBS (talk) 16:36, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

  • @PBS: I only moved it due to a requested move from an OTRS ticket. Having never encountered anyone contesting a move before, I went ahead and moved it, so I have no problem if there is a discussion and you want to do it that way. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 00:52, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
No worries. I did not even know that there was such a mechanism for requesting moves, as they normally go through WP:RM either as an uncontested or contested move. In point of fact as there is no other science park in Birmingham there seems little point appending Aston to the article title if the name is to be changed.-- PBS (talk) 01:01, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Hyannis Fire Department[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Hyannis Fire Department has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unremarkable page with little context.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Zackmann08 (talk) 17:41, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Barnstable Fire Department[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Barnstable Fire Department has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unremarkable page with little context.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Zackmann08 (talk) 17:41, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Centerville-Osterville-Marstons Mills Fire Department[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Centerville-Osterville-Marstons Mills Fire Department has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unremarkable page with little context.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Zackmann08 (talk) 17:41, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Cotuit Fire Department[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Cotuit Fire Department has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unremarkable page with little context.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Zackmann08 (talk) 17:41, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of West Barnstable Fire Department[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article West Barnstable Fire Department has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unremarkable page with little context.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Zackmann08 (talk) 17:41, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Talk:John B. Tsu/Temp[edit]

Hello, just so you know, this was not the right way to resolve a page that has been blanked for copyright investigation. The author was re-writing it on the Temp page of course, but once done the temp page must be histmerged into the main article, not copy/pasted in with the Temp page blanked-redirected. Copy/pasting it as was done here loses all the attribution for the editing that the author had done on the temp page (required by our license), and that edit has now been attributed to you. I'll see about fixing the history. Thanks, CrowCaw 20:58, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

My apologies, as I was under the impression that as long as the same person wrote the page, there would be no issues copying and pasting it. Thanks for fixing the issue though, as it is greatly appreciated. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 21:44, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

CSD[edit]

Hi Ktr101, Just to let you know I've CSD'd Summa Western Reserve Hospital under A7 (For some daft reason Twinkle didn't notify you so thought I should quickly let you know..) Thanks and Happy editing :), –Davey2010Talk 22:12, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CIX, April 2015[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 06:33, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Maia Weinstock for speedy deletion[edit]

I have added a speedy deletion tag to Maia Weinstock. I am sure she is very nice, but I fail to see how she would be notable beyond meta-Wikipedia affairs.Zigzig20s (talk) 19:16, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Maia Weinstock[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Maia Weinstock has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Trifling notability. Fails WP:BLP1E and therefore fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Safiel (talk) 19:20, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Maia Weinstock for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Maia Weinstock is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maia Weinstock until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Safiel (talk) 22:40, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Borghild Project[edit]

Symbol question.svg Hello! Your submission of Borghild Project at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 04:35, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of List of fire districts in Barnstable, Massachusetts for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of fire districts in Barnstable, Massachusetts is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fire districts in Barnstable, Massachusetts until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Zackmann08 (talk) 04:48, 30 April 2015 (UTC)


Nomination of Barnstable Police Department for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Barnstable Police Department is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barnstable Police Department until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mellowed Fillmore (talk) 04:49, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Maia Weinstock[edit]

Symbol question.svg Hello! Your submission of Maia Weinstock at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 21:47, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Your contributed article, 2015 Frankford, Philadelphia train derailment[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, 2015 Frankford, Philadelphia train derailment. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – May 2015 Amtrak derailment. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at May 2015 Amtrak derailment – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. EoRdE6(Come Talk to Me!) 04:06, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Maia Weinstock[edit]

Harrias talk 20:11, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CX, May 2015[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:03, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

A cup of coffee for you![edit]

Cup-o-coffee-simple.svg I noticed your edit dif where you accidently reverted something back to the wrong version. Have this much nice cup of coffee that is much needed. Cheers! Peter.Ctalkcontribs 13:09, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
Thanks, as I certainly need it! Kevin Rutherford (talk) 13:10, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

Just so you know ...[edit]

The reason the month was used in the title of what you have now moved to 2013 Spuyten Duyvil derailment was that, as noted on the talk page, there had been another derailment, of a freight train, near the same site earlier that year. So there hadn't been "only one". This is why, before you get the idea to be bold and change something that doesn't appear to make sense, you should look around and see if there wasn't some good reason for it in the first place.

Now, of course, we had left the article title that way because we thought we might create July 2013 Spuyten Duyvil derailment eventually. But almost a year and a half later, we still haven't, so in that respect I don't blame you because it was on us to create the other article and we never did. So I shall do so in the near future, and then restore the other article's original title. Daniel Case (talk) 14:45, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

Quixotic plea[edit]

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Wikipediholism test. Thanks. — {{U|Technical 13}} (etc) 06:35, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

Белорусская лесная компания & Раф-кофе Comment[edit]

Hi Ktr101,

With regard to the above articles, I have reverted your edit because a foreign article does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion (see WP:A2). Usually these articles requires the tag {{Not English}} to see if anyone would be interested to translate the particular article. These articles would only be deleted after 2 weeks and even so requires a nomination for deletion.

That being said, I have checked the respective Copyvios reports and confirmed that above articles are copied from individual websites (CSD G12). I have updated the CSD tags for the articles now.

Hope that's fine. - Andrew Y talk 13:46, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

No worries, as I figured that something was up with the articles. Thanks for catching that, and I will remember it next time! Kevin Rutherford (talk) 13:48, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Re-reverting[edit]

I am going to revert this edit. None of these articles should exist, I simply didn't have the interest to do all the work. None of these meet GNG. Maury Markowitz (talk) 23:05, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

I mean, there are thirteen articles in the corresponding category, but I will not fight you on that since I am sure others might have an opinion as well on that. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 23:51, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

2015 Accra explosion[edit]

The 2015 Accra explosion killed more people (200) than the Accra Sports Stadium disaster (127), therefore it appeared incorrect to say it was the worst disaster 'since' then as it was a worse disaster. As a result I removed this and you have now readded it. Sorry if I was not being clear. Rubbish computer 17:26, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

That works for me, and thank you for clarifying that issue! Kevin Rutherford (talk) 00:00, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

No problem! Rubbish computer 15:21, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/Borghild Project[edit]

It's a shame this couldn't be saved for DYK. You may want to give a go at finding more sources for the article itself, but if you can't, then you need to think about whether this is really notable. If you decide not, you may be able to nominate it under WP:G7 and save a deletion discussion. EEng (talk) 16:07, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Third Cape Cod Canal road bridge[edit]

Symbol question.svg Hello! Your submission of Third Cape Cod Canal road bridge at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! ~ RobTalk 09:53, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXI, June 2015[edit]

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:38, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

MBTA station stubs[edit]

Hullo there! I've been thinking that this might be a good time to elevate your five userspace drafts of the MBTA's former Charlestown Elevated and Washington Street Elevated stations to full article status, what with the creation of WikiProject Greater Boston Public Transit and all.

The pages in question are:

Don't worry about them being stubs - they'll grow, and they'll do so faster in the main article space than as userspace drafts. Whoop whoop pull up Bitching Betty | Averted crashes 17:39, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

If you want to go ahead and expand them, go ahead, but I lack the sources to do so and was going to let another editor do it for me. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 20:50, 26 June 2015 (UTC)