Talk:Haml
Deletion
 | This article was previously nominated for deletion. The result of the discussion was Delete. |
Having been deleted in an AfD, this article was undeleted as per Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2007 June 3
Discussion
Haml is a alternative more legible non-XHTML syntax. It is "reversible" in the sense of XSugar?
It is a very interesting language, the Haml's scripts seem more like a "programmable RELAX Compact_syntax" than a tradictional Web template (see formal defs.). What the relationship with Haml and schema specifications (that is not a explicit "core principle")?
-- Krauss 9 December 2006
Haml was designed as a web templating engine and does fit with the rules of one; although HTML isn't valid input like it is for PHP and eRuby, it does fit with all the necessities in the formal definition. Haml isn't really a schema language like RELAX NG or XML Schemas... rather than defining types of XML documents, it defines the documents themselves. Is that what you were asking?
-- Nex3, Haml developer December 16, 2006
I removed the "criticisms and disadvantages" section. Many of the things listed weren't 100% clear disadvantages or commonly accepted fact and they were all unsourced. Much of it appeared to be the opinion of a single editor, so it didn't seem appropriate to keep.