User talk:AmericaIsNumberOne

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Montana's Defender

Per the above SPI, SocalBill09 (talk · contribs), AmericaIsNumberOne (talk · contribs) and Montana's Defender (talk · contribs) are confirmed to be the same person. In lieu of an indefinite block on all three accounts, I'm requiring you to pick one account and stick with it. To ensure compliance, the other two accounts will be blocked indefinitely. Further, you must clearly disclose the link between the three accounts, by, for instance, redirecting the other two accounts' user page/talk pages. Pending receipt of a response, I'm blocking all three accounts indefinitely. Once you have made a decision as to what account you will continue to use, you can use {{unblock|reason}} on that account's talk page. Tim Song (talk) 15:18, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|I picked AmericaIsNumberOne i only changed because i don't like people watching every edit i make bad or good.}}

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

This account is unblocked. Please make sure the other two accounts are visibly linked to this one and stick to this account from now on.

Request handled by: Tim Song (talk)

Unblocking administrator: Please check for active autoblocks on this user after accepting the unblock request.

Having your editing history open to all is a part of the open, free, shared nature of this project. If you want to be here, you just have to deal with it. That said, if someone in particular is singling you out using your edit history, you there are guidelines to help you deal with Wikistalking. --WikidSmaht (talk) 11:05, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked again

I have blocked you again, this time for a full month. It is clear that you are only going to edit without discussion here. This revert shows this clearly. However, if you look at this list of her awards, you'll see that Pippo is correct. You need to understand that Wikipedia is a collaborative effort. You need to talk about your edits. You cannot just keep pressing the undo blindly and not explaining why you do what you do. When your block expires, please make a better effort to discuss your edits. Thank you, either way (talk) 03:13, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AmericaIsNumberOne (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I did not know plus i dont watch MTV

Decline reason:

No grounds for unblocking provided. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 21:30, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You should be blocked just for calling me a jerk.