User talk:Alan355
Talkback
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
VernoWhitney (talk) 15:00, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia
Welcome!
Hi Alan355! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! ...comments? ~BFizz 23:25, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
Hey thanks, I would like to do well here, these links will help me learn my way around.--Alan355 (talk) 14:04, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
Salvation, grace and works
Alan, I hope you don't mind me bringing this tangent of the discussion here but because it delves into personal beliefs which I'm still working out and comparing to sources, I thought it best to bring to the personal talk pages. I think that what you've touched on is one of the mysteries that the LDS face. How does one reconcile the idea of a gradation of glory with the concept that none of it is deserved/earned by the works that correlate with the groups that end up there and the concept that any glory is a gift through the grace of the atonement? I don't think I've found any source yet from the LDS leaders that delineates the heavenly arithmetic of it all but, especially in the articles from Oaks, they are clear that salvation and glory in whatever amount is cause by the grace/atonement. I have my own personal thoughts on the subject, based in part on the "prepare for" comment, how this is reconciled. I believe that God will bless us as much as He can such that are happiness is maximized. By the law, all fall short and are unworthy of returning to God, hence the atonement and grace which allows the ends of the Law to be satisfied in the sacrifice of Christ and allows us, though unworthy, to come back into the presence of God. But those who do not repent and achieve forgiveness by means of the atonement would be miserable in the presence of a perfect God (Alma 12:14). In this way the works are more to prepare and qualify us for the reward, but do nothing to earn or make us deserving of the reward, because in truth we don't deserve it no matter how many good things we do. So God, being both just and merciful, blesses each person as much as he or she can stand and still be happy. I think this is one reason why the degrees of glory are characterized by whose presence is present (Father and Christ vs. Christ vs. just the Spirit). So the things that I do are not to earn, to merit, or to make so that I deserve neither the grace nor the heavenly reward, but to prepare myself so that I can be be truly happy in the presence of God and happy receiving all the blessings He can give me. That's why I believe He gives us commandments and requires us to do certain things to receive blessings, not so that He, like an umpire, can call us at home if we fail, nor so that He, like a glorified accountant, can make sure that the heavenly ledger of my life is balanced, but because He knows that, somehow in the calculus of the cosmos, doing so will maximize my happiness and because the journey which the commandments lays out increases the intrinsic value of the heavenly destination. I think part of the divine calculus for why this works the way it does is that the actions themselves are necessary but not sufficient condition for a personal relationship with Christ, which relationship is really what determines our happiness. In the end though I don't know what that calculus is which makes this all work, it's still a mystery to me, but I'm content with not knowing because I do know that God loves His children and that love is His motivation for everything He does and everything He asks of me. Like I said, this is my personal beliefs based on my gleanings from the scriptures and statements from LDS leaders and my own experiences, which precludes its inclusion in the article, but it is a way (in particular my way) to still believe within an LDS theology in salvation and heavenly reward received by grace but requiring works without the idea of the works earning or meriting the reward. --FyzixFighter (talk) 19:17, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
No I don’t mind discussing it here at all. I want to thank you for explaining it to me, I hope you don’t think that my comments and questions about this have been disrespectful. I know this isn’t indicative of all Mormons, but a lot of the LDS literature I read said the current prophet and the apostles are responsible for interpreting scripture, so it is a little confusing when over the last 180 years some of the interpretations have changed, and it can be a little difficult to figure out what the current beliefs are. I grew up in the Church of Christ, which always emphasized personal study and understanding. Many of my teachers, and I as well as I became a teacher, always stressed getting our information from the Bible. The message of the Bible is unchanging, final, and absolute, some parts are difficult and in Job, God tells us that he isn’t going to answer every question we have. In practice, if I hear something taught or preached in a religious environment and it doesn’t agree with what the Bible says then I must follow the Bible, just like the Bereans how checked to scriptures to make sure what Paul was teaching was right (Acts 17:11). There can be great help in the words of men, but the source of all wisdom in his book is the final interpretation (2 Tim 2:15 Study to show thyself approved… rightly dividing the word(NIV – correctly handles the word of truth)) otherwise, I believe we risk changing God as we see fit and as time and culture change, which he doesn’t do whether we want him to or not. If we attempt to do that, we distance ourselves from who and what God truly is and become lost without his light. I do absolutely respect the fact that two honest well-intentioned people can read a scripture and come to different conclusions. I say all this to give a frame of reference and to explain that my beliefs are rooted deeply in the Bible and if it isn’t in the Bible then I try very hard not to attach that to my faith. Concerning grace and works, the Bible says that we are saved by grace alone, and doing good works is the race that we run. The Bible teaches that we should do good to others because it is right, and if we really want to be Christ-like than we should live like Christ. Do I sometimes do good begrudgingly, absolutely, but the more I work at being like Christ, it becomes less like good work, and closer to good life and a Christ attitude. Paul does say faith without deeds is dead, in James 2:26, but the context tells us that deeds are a symptom and natural result of real faith in Jesus. I think that works and obedience are how we reflect God’s love in this world. We have been forgiven, helped & fed, as servants of Christ we should do the same for others so that they can feel God’s love for themselves (Luke 6:31). I do disagree with Oaks, there are many scriptures that talk about eternal punishment, Matthew 8:12 says they will be cast into the darkness where there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth, meaning among other things absence from God. Concerning different rewards in Heaven, Jesus also taught a parable that illustrated that even though some show up late or do less work, all of his servants receive the same reward. The Bible says God is vengeful and jealous, and a good look at the Old Testament will show what happened to those who ignored God and did what they wanted to instead. The Bible tells us of Heaven and Hell, and our inability to describe exactly what those are stems from our having never been there and no absolute frame of reference except the stories in the Bible. I hope this explains my frame of reference and what I think the Bible says about the subject. I really haven’t intended to be disrespectful in any of this, but I had a really hard time understanding what you meant, and I hope that my explanations showed a little of that. On this discussion I very much enjoy having my faith challenged, as Hugh Nibley said, “it keeps us on our toes”. I think we are both searching for how to understand God best, and I would very much enjoying more discussions with you in the future.--Alan355 (talk) 14:43, 12 July 2010 (UTC)