User talk:C.Fred

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30
31, 32

This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by .

Please add new threads to the bottom of the page. Misplaced threads can get lost and go unnoticed, especially if I'm in a busy or similar status.

If you are a registered user, I will usually reply to your talk page unless you request otherwise. I may reply to your talk page and copy my response here to preserve a thread or note that the issue has been dealt with. Likewise, I may also reply here and leave a {{Talkback}} template on your talk page for the sake of threading.

If you are an unregistered user, I will reply on this page and leave a {{Talkback}} template on your IP address' User talk page.

Note that all threads older than 7 days will be archived. Please sign and date your comment (by adding ~~~~ at the end) to assist the bot that archives this page.

Uncivil comments may be deleted summarily.

thanks

DougsTech (talk) has given you a fresh piece of fried chicken! Pieces of fried chicken promote WikiLove and hopefully this piece has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a piping hot piece, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Bon appetit!

Spread the tastiness of fried chicken by adding {{subst:GiveChicken}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Rachael Faye Hill AfD

Hi. The Rachael Faye Hill article that you contributed to recently had been added as an AfD. I would like to invite you to contribute to the AfD discussion as to whether or not the article should be deleted here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Rachael_Faye_Hill. MartinManson (talk) 19:49, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Gandla redirected to ganiga.

Hi Fred -- Gandla is a famous sub caste of reddy caste in karim nagar and adilabad districts of andhrapradesh. Ganiga is actually oil ganiga group. Goud caste is known as goundla and not gandla. Please refer to reddyonline.com or other reddy websites about reddy sub castes .request not to divert it to ganiga .

Thanks reddy —Preceding unsigned comment added by Reddy123456789 (talk • contribs) 05:52, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I can provide some more use full sites but please wait.

Fred -- Thanks for your quick reply ..please give me some time and i will provide you the details. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Reddy123456789 (talk • contribs) 05:56, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reddy has 52 sub groups and motati gudati and gandla are the famous sub groups.

Hi Fred- I will provide enough information to you soon and you can also verify. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Reddy123456789 (talk • contribs) 05:57, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Apology

I apologize for this forum shopping incident. I personally think I do deserve the rights for the following reasons: Never misused the tool, been recently making good edits and reading the vandalism policy, reading when to use and how to use warnings. If I continue to make good edits like another administrator has said before, do you think it is possible I will get these rights back? --Ratinator·Talk 17:39, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Specifically

Are you saying that I shouldn't apply for only rollback rights, or can I apply for other things such as being a reviser? --Ratinator·Talk 18:09, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't why you trout slapped C.Fred. He did nothing wrong. About applying, don't waste your time applying for anything now. Nobody will even consider giving you rights after what you did today. You will have to wait for awhile for this to be forgotten before reapplying for anything, JDDJS (talk) 19:40, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's called a joke... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ratinator (talk • contribs)

Rudy Gay Clause

The “Rudy Gay Clause” expressed by the user references an NCAA clause which banned colleges from scrimmaging AAU teams in November. Whether the clause is generally accepted as the “Rudy Gay Clause” is beside the point (and still not proven). No such clause exists, period. Associating the name to Rudy Gay is slandering his name. The secondary source is using opinion to back up this point of the argument; an argument to which references false information of a clause that does not exist per NCAA rules and regulations: http://www.ncaa.org/wps/portal/ncaahome?WCM_GLOBAL_CONTEXT=/wps/wcm/connect/ncaa/NCAA/Legislation%20and%20Governance/Eligibility%20and%20Recruiting/Recruiting/recruiting.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.188.160.91 (talk) 02:01, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, yes, it does exist. It was proposal No. 03-92, which passed:

The Management Council approved another important proposal that affects men's basketball. Council members OK'd Proposal No. 03-92, which precludes teams from scheduling exhibition games against noncollegiate teams. The proposal alleviates pressure for basketball coaches to schedule exhibition games against "club" teams run by people with connections to high-school prospects.

Strikehold (talk) 23:49, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Teenage Dream

If you think the article is ready, it needs to be discussed somewhere other than the incubator talk page. WT:MUSIC may be the right place. I sense a process problem here: I don't know where to discuss whether an incubated article is ready.—Kww(talk) 22:07, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"Interested", certainly. Unbiased? That's what makes me hesitant. Asking about a Katy Perry album on a talk page dominated by Katy Perry fans just doesn't sit well with me.—Kww(talk) 22:46, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cole World

The album was redirect by an AfD as you know. Well I have added more sources at my draft at User:STATicVerseatide/Cole World. Is it ready for an article? As of note about the title: Cha Cha Answers which is a free version of KGB said that a title had not yet been chosin. I dont know if there is enough sourcing to still pass WP:HAMMER Red Flag on the Right Side 01:10, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rachael Faye Hill Deletion Review

Hi, as you were a significant contributor to the Rachael Faye Hill article and also contributed to the Rachael Faye Hill AfD, I would like to invite you to contribute to the deletion review to express your opinions.

The deletion review is located at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2010_July_15#Rachael_Faye_Hill

MartinManson (talk) 09:44, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]