User talk:The1exile
Welcome!
Hi The1exile! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! -- Eagleamn 22:15, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
juba page
- ) Thanks for your comments.
On the one hand, you did post comments about your changes... and on the other hand, there has been a disucssion going on for over a month about what kind of warning/how to language the videos... and from my perspective, your comments didn't take that disucssion into account at all. I guess I would have liked a little more sensitivity and involvement in the on-going dialogue before changing things.
I was also confused by placing the comments IN the article....
On the other hand, you did make comments about your post, and try to discuss where you are coming from, so I could have been more sensitive to your attempts.
peace! Sethie 00:56, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
F-22
You'll have to forgive me for ignoring the 'debate' on the F-22 article's discussion page, for frankly I am rather bemused at the fact that there is such a debate at all, when the aircraft has clearly been re-designated. Besides, I reverted your edit to the Meteor article based on the fact that it was wrong, and that I knew it to be wrong (and can back up my assertion if needs be). Why then do I need to justify it on a different article? If one article has a line saying that the sky is green, surely it's ok to go ahead and correct that entry rather than going over to the article on 'the sky' and engaging in any debate that might exist in its discussion page? Perhaps I'm reading something into your comment that wasn't there, and I apologise if this is so, however at the moment it certainly seems to me that you are alleging discourtesy on my part, and that is something I object to. Regards — Impi 23:11, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
- I have posted five quick links on the F-22 discussion page. All either reference the aircraft by its 'new' F-22A designation, or refer to the redesignation itself, notably by the USAF's own news office. I think that's evidence enough that a redesignation has taken place, even if the USAF is avoiding repeating the arguably overhyped fanfare that has characterised the F-22 program's milestones in the past. — Impi 23:34, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
Anon editing
I just noticed a question that you asked a while back at Wikipedia talk:Welcome, newcomers. I don't know if anyone answered you, so I'll explain. Anonymous users are no longer allowed to create new articles, although (as I'm sure you've noticed) they are allowed to edit articles that already exist. Also, they can request new pages at Wikipedia:Articles for creation. So, they technically can create new articles if tenured users approve them first. --TantalumTelluride 23:46, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
Welcome to WP: Air!
I see your point on the JSF. Mayhaps you can help us work up a box for 21st century fighters. Glad to have you aboard, The1exile! Guapovia 22:37, 30 January 2006 (UTC)