User talk:C.Fred

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30
31, 32

This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by .

Please add new threads to the bottom of the page. Misplaced threads can get lost and go unnoticed, especially if I'm in a busy or similar status.

If you are a registered user, I will usually reply to your talk page unless you request otherwise. I may reply to your talk page and copy my response here to preserve a thread or note that the issue has been dealt with. Likewise, I may also reply here and leave a {{Talkback}} template on your talk page for the sake of threading.

If you are an unregistered user, I will reply on this page and leave a {{Talkback}} template on your IP address' User talk page.

Note that all threads older than 7 days will be archived. Please sign and date your comment (by adding ~~~~ at the end) to assist the bot that archives this page.

Uncivil comments may be deleted summarily.

thanks

DougsTech (talk) has given you a fresh piece of fried chicken! Pieces of fried chicken promote WikiLove and hopefully this piece has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a piping hot piece, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Bon appetit!

Spread the tastiness of fried chicken by adding {{subst:GiveChicken}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Rudy Gay Clause

The “Rudy Gay Clause” expressed by the user references an NCAA clause which banned colleges from scrimmaging AAU teams in November. Whether the clause is generally accepted as the “Rudy Gay Clause” is beside the point (and still not proven). No such clause exists, period. Associating the name to Rudy Gay is slandering his name. The secondary source is using opinion to back up this point of the argument; an argument to which references false information of a clause that does not exist per NCAA rules and regulations: http://www.ncaa.org/wps/portal/ncaahome?WCM_GLOBAL_CONTEXT=/wps/wcm/connect/ncaa/NCAA/Legislation%20and%20Governance/Eligibility%20and%20Recruiting/Recruiting/recruiting.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.188.160.91 (talk) 02:01, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, yes, it does exist. It was proposal No. 03-92, which passed:

The Management Council approved another important proposal that affects men's basketball. Council members OK'd Proposal No. 03-92, which precludes teams from scheduling exhibition games against noncollegiate teams. The proposal alleviates pressure for basketball coaches to schedule exhibition games against "club" teams run by people with connections to high-school prospects.

Strikehold (talk) 23:49, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Teenage Dream

If you think the article is ready, it needs to be discussed somewhere other than the incubator talk page. WT:MUSIC may be the right place. I sense a process problem here: I don't know where to discuss whether an incubated article is ready.—Kww(talk) 22:07, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"Interested", certainly. Unbiased? That's what makes me hesitant. Asking about a Katy Perry album on a talk page dominated by Katy Perry fans just doesn't sit well with me.—Kww(talk) 22:46, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cole World

The album was redirect by an AfD as you know. Well I have added more sources at my draft at User:STATicVerseatide/Cole World. Is it ready for an article? As of note about the title: Cha Cha Answers which is a free version of KGB said that a title had not yet been chosin. I dont know if there is enough sourcing to still pass WP:HAMMER Red Flag on the Right Side 01:10, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rachael Faye Hill Deletion Review

Hi, as you were a significant contributor to the Rachael Faye Hill article and also contributed to the Rachael Faye Hill AfD, I would like to invite you to contribute to the deletion review to express your opinions.

The deletion review is located at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2010_July_15#Rachael_Faye_Hill

MartinManson (talk) 09:44, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

My tagging The Rugby Forum

Hi C.Fred,
If you think I just wasn't thinking straight when I added the WP:PROD tag (and with a WP:CSD reason)... well, erm, I completely agree with you! Also, thanks for not biting this oldie for a newbie mistake. What was I thinking?
--Shirt58 (talk) 11:00, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Rugby Forum

Hi C.Fred, any chance you can point me in the correct direction to a possible guide for a layout of the forum? Rowlan placed an image in on the page and I would like to move it or at least align it to make it look a little tidier. Any help would be much appreciated. Welshman25 (talk) 16:00, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jesse Goldwater

Hi-

As the contributor on the Jesse Goldwater page, I would like to have access to the text so I can resubmit it to prove significance to wikipedia. It was deleted under the terms that there were not sources provided, and that he was related to other people of merit. While he is indeed related to such people, the purpose of the article was not for those reasons. I would like access so that I might provide sources, along with a clean up of the article to establish him as a notable person worth of inclusion in wikipedia's archives. Thank you for your consideration.

Pennymoon (talk) 23:10, 18 July 2010 (UTC)Pennymoon[reply]

How can I make that right?

Thank you very much for your answer. However, I am not writing about my book … I am writing about science … If mentioning the title of my book as reference is a problem, I will not post it … However, readers will understand that the text is coming from the other references listed on that page … How can I make that right? Fhbrain (talk) 04:25, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jason Steed (Book Series)

While I appreciate that you are keen to make Wikipedia a wonderful encyclopedia full of amazing facts, can I ask if you actually checked the article Jason Steed (Book Series) before you deleted it per "deletion discussion"? This delection discussion took place in June 2009 - more than a year ago - and, since then, new references have been added, a publication date set and tributes paid to the book by the author Joe Craig - who is officially considered 'Wikipedia notable.' Just thought I'd ask.--Onthemap (talk) 12:46, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Would absolutely love to C.Fred but, of course, you have deleted the page. So that makes it rather hard, or rather well nigh impossible, doesn't it???! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Onthemap (talk • contribs) 12:54, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Could only find an old copy, but here are a couple of refs: This one [1] is a newspaper article which gives most of the details. This [2] gives details of the publishing deal and how the book is an "internet hit", this [3] lists the book as a finalist in the Indie Book Awards and this [4] is an official interview with the writer from TeensReadToo.com. is this enough to be getting on with?--Onthemap (talk) 14:37, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Those who dwell under bridges

In case you missed it, the IP who has been posting to may talk page and removed content from List of Jonas L.A. episodes is a troll. "She" has posted on my talk page in the past.[5] She commits subtle vandalism,[6] like changing colours on pages for no reason. She seems able to maintain an IP for as long as she wants but changes it as soon as she's identified as a vandal or her edits are reverted, as she's done at the Jonas article. I'm not sure what to do about her. --AussieLegend (talk) 13:17, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]