Talk:Your Love (Nicki Minaj song)

Your Love (Nicki Minaj song) is currently a good article nominee. Nominated by Theuhohreo (talk) at 04:32, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

An editor has indicated a willingness to review the article in accordance with the good article criteria and will decide whether or not to list it as a good article. Comments are welcome from any editor who has not nominated or contributed significantly to this article. This review will be closed by the first reviewer. To add comments to this review, click discuss review and edit the page.

This article is not categorized by subtopic. Please edit the |subtopic= parameter on this talk page to include one. For a list of subtopics, please see Wikipedia:Good article nominations.

Songs C‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

edit

{{editsemiprotected}} In the release history section, change the Mainstream radio date from June 21 to June 15. as the Source given now says June 15 not June 22.

Done ^Avicenna_sis @ 07:40, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your Love Single cover(s)

Both covers were released and cited. The first one (Minaj smirking to her right) was released promotionally and officially as the cover and was used by sites such as Rap-Up, AOL and many other blogs/sites that reviewed the song. The cover was changed for the iTunes release, which happens to so far be the only release the song has gotten. Both covers should be included in the article since both are official covers. Theuhohreo (talk) 15:40, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There is discussion, because the cover was not even a promotional cover. Because Rap-Up and AOL use the cover mean nothing, they are not Young Money/Cash Money/Universal Motown. The definition of a promotional single is "is a recording issued on Vinyl, 8-track, Cassette, CD, MP3, VHS, DVD, or Blu-ray." So that means the official cover is considered "the promotional cover" It is not an official cover, if it were than a remix or single or something would have been released with that cover. If another editor sees this anyway the image would be deleted because it fails NFCC #8. Candyo32 (talk) 15:44, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Remixes

The song has had 3 remixes released (so far by July 19) which include remixes by Flo Rida, Sean Paul and an Urban Remix. I believe the song should include a new section for remixes. Theuhohreo (talk) 01:44, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, none of these remixes have been deemed official. Second, for a remixes section to be in use, there must be extensive coverage of remix not just one or two sentences about a few unofficial remixes (see Turnin Me On). For most official remixes they don't even warrant a whole section (see the Background of I Invented Sex). Candyo32 01:59, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The song has so far had 3 remixes and the music video isn't even out yet. Although none are official they have been reviewed and even commented on by Minaj herself. I already added the section if it still isn't notable enough than just delete it. Theuhohreo (talk) 02:08, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I moved it to the Background because unofficial remixes still aren't notable to warrant a full section. Also its no need in making a bulleted list of remixes when its in prose. Also unlike Flo Rida and Sean Paul, "Urban Noize" is definitely not notable so per Wikipedia's notablity standars it shouldn't be used, especially since it is unofficial at that. Btw, Twitter is not a reliable source, even if it is a verified account. Candyo32 02:17, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I understand moving the remixes to the background, but I don't understand why the Urban Noize Mix isn't added along with the others... Because they are all "unofficial" remixes so wouldn't they all get "treated" the same? Theuhohreo (talk) 13:59, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As I've stated, although unofficial, Flo Rida and Sean Paul are well-known rappers. "Urban Noize" isn't a well known remix treatment, such as Dave Audes or example. Candyo32 14:14, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Music video

ughh i can't understand why the reference #18 is messing up like that on the bottom! it's annoying me!!!! lol I can't see anything wrong with it -___- Theuhohreo (talk) 16:26, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done the ref tags had different names. One was "idolator" and the other was "idolatorreview." So I made them both the same. Candyo32 16:30, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

i couldn't for the life of me fix that! lol Theuhohreo (talk) 16:39, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Music video photo

i think their should be a better photo for the music video pictures. pictures that better describe the video because those screen caps aren't really the best... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.161.145.226 (talk) 18:39, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

✗ Not done Those are fine. It is depicting the battle scene, it is better to have a cap from something important in the video rather than just any shot from the video. Candyo32 18:48, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done Changed the photo to illustrate the artistic use of fabrics as scenery. Might leave, depends on the reception between both photos. Theuhohreo (talk) 17:09, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

i was thinking about someone putting pics up of minaj bleeding that red cloth in the end and the blue cloth under the bridge where they meet??? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.161.145.226 (talk) 18:55, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That doesn't sound like a bad idea but I think the pictures are fine for now. Maybe changed later if I can get a better screen-shot. Theuhohreo (talk) 19:39, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

link to music video?

ive been searching and i cannot find the link. plz help anybody? (98.231.218.47 (talk) 17:51, 26 July 2010 (UTC))[reply]