User talk:Off2riorob

User:Off2riorob is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Duck Test

The Biography Barnstar
Long overdue for your tireless efforts in upholding WP:BLP. – ukexpat (talk) 04:18, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The BLP Barnstar
In recognition of your work and vigilance at the WP:BLP/N noticeboard. it is good to see BLP issues in biographies resolved and addressed. Thank you.JN466 15:05, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The Barnstar of Diligence
For taking on the joyless task of editing the partisan hell of political biography. Rsloch (talk) 22:34, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The Anti-Flame Barnstar
For taking the time to care to help cool me down when I was acting like a ^;^ d**k Hell In A Bucket (talk) 16:11, 2 December 2009 (UTC) [reply]

This is Off2riorob's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 1 days may be automatically archived by .

(Manual archive list)

Just a reminder

FYI and as a reminder inre the dispute tag, "The Gore Effect" is under 1RR restriction per the CC probation. JakeInJoisey (talk) 18:58, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No it`s not jake, only certain articles within the probation are under 1r mark nutley (talk) 19:00, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I can easily be mistaken, but I thought this article was brought under the CC umbrella? JakeInJoisey (talk) 19:01, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It is under the probation jake, but not all articles in the probation are under 1r, although given this one is a contentious article perhaps it should be? Ask one of the admins if it should be brought under 1r mark nutley (talk) 19:10, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm...is there a list of the articles under 1r somewhere? If this article isn't so restricted, then off2riorob's revert was fine...nor am I particularly inclined (at least not right now) to see that restriction applied. JakeInJoisey (talk) 19:15, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No there is no list anywere, it is done via a template on the article, look at climategate article mark nutley (talk) 19:20, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the info. I'm (perhaps fortunately) unfamiliar with the restriction tag and wrongly assumed it applied to all within CC. JakeInJoisey (talk) 19:26, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, thanks for the note Jake as to be reported for such crap would be a personal embarrassment . Off2riorob (talk) 19:13, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No harm, no foul I guess...and my apologies for the bad info. JakeInJoisey (talk) 19:26, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What's cooking?

Any interesting articles? Freakshownerd (talk) 22:48, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There area few in my edit history, the HP guy and girl and more, if your looking for something specific in need of a quality contributor I will gladly find you a worthwhile project. 22:52, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

Fisher

Since I am a reporter, and this is my original, published research that someone is quoting here, I would like to be credited. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jg3arrow (talk • contribs) 17:23, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I see..you shouldn't be going round adding your own comments and links to your website, that a bit promotional..but the word press is pretty regular not a WP:RS ...shall we remove the comment as well, or do you want to ask at the WP:RSN noticeboard if it is ok to use? Off2riorob (talk) 17:27, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sock suspect

The user in question is Jamen Somasu (talk · contribs) Daniel Case (talk) 21:02, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

I agree. Remember the same user has worked from User talk:90.194.100.16, User talk:194.80.49.252, User talk:155.136.80.35, User talk:90.197.236.12,User talk:90.207.105.117, User talk:90.197.224.58. Similar problems with edits to BLP articles across wikipedia, With official warnings here and here. With previous block here. Monkeymanman (talk) 14:20, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, multiple violations at multiple articles with multiple IP addresses. Off2riorob (talk) 14:25, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have had enough of this editor, making reports to ANI without letting me know is simply not cool. I understand he might be annoyed at not getting his way with adding the same material onto that article, but it is exactly the same dubious, potentially personally damaging material that has already been rejected across wikipedia.Monkeymanman (talk) 13:10, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately the page has been protected now so that option is not open for me. Thanks for the advice anyway. Monkeymanman (talk) 14:42, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, thanks for the advice. Monkeymanman (talk) 14:54, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quoting a source that says "f***"

Hi mate, got a minute? Before I get meself into too much trouble, I wanted you to sanity check something... is my edit here the right thing to do? It's a revert, my second, and I think I'm right here (I've posted on the talkpage, but that doesn't make me right, obviously). Anyhoo... am I right? Does it matter? Incidentally, I am not asking you to pile in and start reverting - if it looks like there's an edit war shaping up I'll protect it (on The Wrong Fucking Version) and argue the toss on the talkpage. TFOWR 18:55, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, interesting indeed, we could say something like...and the cabin staff responded with a string of expletives... I will have a look at the talkpage, imo although we are not censored adding verbal insults with no encyclopedic value is not of any true educational value. Off2riorob (talk) 19:00, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and sorry for dragging you into editing the article - still, it's a BLP so I guess it's right up your street?! I gather I distracted you from Chelsea Clinton - sorry! TFOWR 20:06, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, it was worth a look..Well, if I had my way I would delete that flight attendant article immediately, and I am taking it of my watchlist as we speak..Chelsea Clinton is of course another matter.. Beast. Off2riorob (talk) 20:08, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

:-o What, you mean than an article about an individual famous for exactly one event should be deleted?! Deletionist! Deletionist! I've avoided the AfD - I only got involved because I protected the page yesterday. In the grand scheme of things the "****" really isn't as important as some of the BLP issues - I saw someone delete something well dodgy just now, and was ashamed I'd missed it... TFOWR 20:19, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oops

Sorry about that. Very ill-disciplined of me I'm afraid. New page patrol is an interesting place indeed! Freakshownerd (talk) 00:50, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This page has been semi-protected so that only autoconfirmed users can edit it.

So, are you a Christian or wut? ☘HappyDude The Mad Tim☘ craic 02:24, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]