User talk:DavidAppletree
DavidAppletree (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I wasn't doing anything wrong. This seems rather arbitrary to me. Lots of things are being discussed on the ANI board about me, and I was defending myself. I wasn't attacking anyone or breaking any rules. It seems to me that WP wanted to censor elements of my off-wiki website that some editors didn't like. When I said I'd be more than happy to consider certain changes if any editors in question wanted to discuss specific problems they had, but I would NOT just censor all my criticism of Wikipedia from years ago, it seems to have upset various WP editors, and now, suddenly, I'm blocked. I came here with an open mind, looking for peace and I've been met with very little but harassment, assumptions of the worst faith possible and demands that I censor my website of content critical of Wikipedia and certain editors I found to be biased. ::sigh:: I guess not much ever changes around here. Thanks to Avi, Spartaz and Off2riorob for trying anyway. |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}}
with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=I wasn't doing anything wrong. This seems rather arbitrary to me. Lots of things are being discussed on the ANI board about me, and I was defending myself. I wasn't attacking anyone or breaking any rules. It seems to me that WP wanted to censor elements of my off-wiki website that some editors didn't like. When I said I'd be more than happy to consider certain changes if any editors in question wanted to discuss specific problems they had, but I would NOT just censor all my criticism of Wikipedia from years ago, it seems to have upset various WP editors, and now, suddenly, I'm blocked. I came here with an open mind, looking for peace and I've been met with very little but harassment, assumptions of the worst faith possible and demands that I censor my website of content critical of Wikipedia and certain editors I found to be biased. ::sigh:: I guess not much ever changes around here. Thanks to Avi, Spartaz and Off2riorob for trying anyway. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here
with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=I wasn't doing anything wrong. This seems rather arbitrary to me. Lots of things are being discussed on the ANI board about me, and I was defending myself. I wasn't attacking anyone or breaking any rules. It seems to me that WP wanted to censor elements of my off-wiki website that some editors didn't like. When I said I'd be more than happy to consider certain changes if any editors in question wanted to discuss specific problems they had, but I would NOT just censor all my criticism of Wikipedia from years ago, it seems to have upset various WP editors, and now, suddenly, I'm blocked. I came here with an open mind, looking for peace and I've been met with very little but harassment, assumptions of the worst faith possible and demands that I censor my website of content critical of Wikipedia and certain editors I found to be biased. ::sigh:: I guess not much ever changes around here. Thanks to Avi, Spartaz and Off2riorob for trying anyway. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
- Note to reviewing admin: blocking administrator apparently forgot to leave a note here. The block rationale may be seen in their posting to ANI [1]. –xenotalk 22:17, 30 August 2010 (UTC)