Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BDR Thermea

BDR Thermea

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I originally speedy tagged this as spam but an admin removed the tag (the original editor didn't weigh in with a "hangon" template as is normal - an external admin decided to create more work here by proactively removing the speedy tag). Anyway, absolutely no attempt to establish notability. Article is a single line saying "hey, we exist." Original posting didn't even spell "dosmetic" correctly. In my opinion, if the original editor was going to expand this, the "hangon" tag would have been fine. But admin action means we all have to go the extra mile and do an AfD on this. Quartermaster (talk) 01:25, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep As the admin said, this page is not unambiguously promotional. Research shows that this firm is notable enough with quite a large amount of sources available. But boy does this need a rewrite if this article is to stay. Fattyjwoods ^{Push my button} 02:30, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]