User talk:Anaxial

Archives

This page has archives. Sections may be automatically archived by .

collaboration -to start the ball rolling

The current WikiProject Mammals collaboration article is Slow loris.
Last month's winner was: Fossa (animal).
Feel free to cast your vote for next month's article
Voting for this month's collaboration will end: TBA.

Smash Court Tennis

Dude why, why did you do this to me analaxle, why? It was a constructive edit!

WikiProject Mammals Notice Board

In line with the recent upgrades to WikiProject Mammals a bulletin board has been created to keep all members up to date with the Project, consider it similiar to the Wikipedia Signpost however focused on WikiProject Mammals. I would ask that you add this page to your watchlist in order to get the latest information about WikiProject Mammals. Kind Regards - ZooPro and The Arbiter^★_★^★

5041

I have man whore don't discriminateque. !!!

Talk:Fraţii Buzeşti High School

There was a great deal of discussion between me and the other party on our Talk pages. Everard Proudfoot (talk) 19:23, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In that case, you should have linked to that discussion (I did look for a discussion, but couldn't find one). No problem, though; feel free to re-list the request with the correct link. And remember to sign with five tildes, not four! But thanks for the correction. Anaxial (talk) 20:37, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's resolved because it wound up at WP:ANI. Thanks. Everard Proudfoot (talk) 21:26, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your note

What is your basis? What makes you think I was censoring anything? There are two separate images in the article - one of a "cut" individual in 2 stages and another image of two separate people in differing stages with a claim that the "uncut" erect is the person on the right.

I made no efforts regarding the image displaying a single person in different stages, I sought to remove the image which shows 2 different people and merely claims that the image on the right was of an un-cut individual. It's unsupported.99.141.241.60 (talk) 20:47, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I see now that you've jumped from cries of "censorship" to screams of "vandalism". What basis now for the rhetorical escalation? Read my edit summary. Review WP:AGF. Digest. Then please reconsider your position. 99.141.241.60 (talk) 20:51, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As you're interested, here's a link to what the image, if it had been of the same person, would have appeared like in the erect state:

File:Penis erection forskin.jpg

An uncircumcised erect penis with foreskin (right)

99.141.241.60 (talk) 21:10, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Compare to the image in the article:

File:Erection Homme.jpg

An uncircumcised penis semi-erect with foreskin unretracted (left) and erect with foreskin retracted (right)

I'd dispute that I have "screamed" anything ("claimed", yes, "screamed"?, nah...) but feel free to revert, with an appropriate edit summary this time to avoid further confusion. That's generally a good idea, especially when deleting something. Anaxial (talk) 21:12, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

How about this as an edit summary: "(Caption makes unsupported claim, as image is of two different people the claim is unsupported and based only on the caption writers say-so. Image does not appear factual for the Un-C Er.)"? 99.141.241.60 (talk) 21:14, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Seems fine to me.Anaxial (talk) 21:18, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Are you Commons:User:Ellington? — $Jeff G. ツ$ 21:15, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Who, me? No. Anaxial (talk) 21:18, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relevance of your question please?.99.141.241.60 (talk) 21:16, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Only that person should be making your claim above about the image you posted above. — $Jeff G. ツ$ 21:19, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What claim? 99.141.241.60 (talk) 21:23, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]