User talk:70.25.46.99
Blocked
{{unblock|Your reason here}} below. FASTILY (TALK) 08:43, 17 November 2009 (UTC)September 2010
This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Indur, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. nableezy - 17:08, 14 September 2010 (UTC) 17:08, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
- How is correcting a mistranslation "vandalizing"? Please explain to me where I vandalized. 70.25.46.99 (talk) 20:26, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
- Removing the cited content on the depopulation of the village and the protests demanding the residents' right of return be respected. nableezy - 20:29, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
- How is correcting a mistranslation "vandalizing"? Please explain to me where I vandalized. 70.25.46.99 (talk) 20:26, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
- And the Israeli side of the story? The presence of Jews during the time of King Saul? I have no problem with including the Palestinian argument, but only in a balanced, fair, way that DOESN'T gloss over the Muslim Conquests, DOESN'T avoid any mention of a Jewish presence prior to 1948, DOESN'T use deliberate mistranslations about The Witch of Endor, and whatnot. Just a fair NPOV appraisal of history. You wanna throw in the Israelites slaughter of the Canaanites, go ahead, just don't be selective about which history you like and which you don't: The Muslim Invasions of the 7th century must too be included. 70.25.46.99 (talk) 20:37, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
- You need to provide quality sources if you wish to include such material. Even though you are banned as the user AbdulHornochsmannn, if you actually provided quality sources you may be able to include such material. As it stands, you are removing well-sourced material and adding unsourced material. That is not acceptable. I dont really care if you think that the articles are biased or antisemitic or anything else. What matters is what the sources say. Bye. nableezy - 20:46, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
- How about the King James Translation of the Bible? Would that meet your criteria?
- I've tried. I've quoted Pullitzer Prize winning historians...only to have them removed as "vandalism". Seems you're name's gotta be "Benny Morris" or "Something Bonavista" or a Newspaper called "Ha'aretz" to be allowed to say ANYTHING. 70.25.46.99 (talk) 20:52, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
- You can change the part on the translation and I wont revert it. But you have not been doing just that, so please dont continue this game that those edits were the cause of the removal. nableezy - 21:04, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
- Muslim Conqusts, Ancient Israel, non-ridiculously slanted historians still verboten? I can cite literally THOUSANDS of eminent historians who have just a slightly less, humungous bias against Jews and Zionism, but they all end up being "vandalism".70.25.46.99 (talk) 21:35, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
- You can change the part on the translation and I wont revert it. But you have not been doing just that, so please dont continue this game that those edits were the cause of the removal. nableezy - 21:04, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
- You need to provide quality sources if you wish to include such material. Even though you are banned as the user AbdulHornochsmannn, if you actually provided quality sources you may be able to include such material. As it stands, you are removing well-sourced material and adding unsourced material. That is not acceptable. I dont really care if you think that the articles are biased or antisemitic or anything else. What matters is what the sources say. Bye. nableezy - 20:46, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
- And the Israeli side of the story? The presence of Jews during the time of King Saul? I have no problem with including the Palestinian argument, but only in a balanced, fair, way that DOESN'T gloss over the Muslim Conquests, DOESN'T avoid any mention of a Jewish presence prior to 1948, DOESN'T use deliberate mistranslations about The Witch of Endor, and whatnot. Just a fair NPOV appraisal of history. You wanna throw in the Israelites slaughter of the Canaanites, go ahead, just don't be selective about which history you like and which you don't: The Muslim Invasions of the 7th century must too be included. 70.25.46.99 (talk) 20:37, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
 | This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address. |