This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
A clear distinction should be made between the more classical fascists like Mussolini who accepted inequality as a natural result of human civilization, and more radicals like the German National Socialists who made it clear that they wanted to destroy the old class system entirely via 'socializing' individuals in a totalitarian state. Hitler's obcession with the German youth was quite particular in this regard, he thought that children who have yet to enter the workforce and thus be lumped in as a class are 'pure', the Nazi's thought they could remove class at an early age through military conscription and nationalist propaganda. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.177.31.89 (talk) 05:10, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Class collaboration specific to fascism??
Communism also has it (collaboration between the communist and proletariat classes) and so does capitalism (it allows people of different classes to work together).
So I propose that first the article describe collaboration as a general idea, and then move on into the forms it had under fascism, communism, and capitalism. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.255.251.8 (talk) 15:30, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
