Talk:Women's baseball

Baseball Stub‑class

	Baseball portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Baseball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of baseball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BaseballWikipedia:WikiProject BaseballTemplate:WikiProject BaseballBaseball articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Deletion proposal response

This response to a deletion proposal was moved from the article:

This article is brief so far, because it is still in development, and I have asked some people who are involved with women's baseball to feel free to add to the article. I disagree that the information in it can be found elsewhere in Wikipedia, because I did searches for women's baseball before creating it, and I did not find anythnig relating to it. Please be patient, as this article could contain a TON of information, so it will take some time to develop it more. Furthermore, there are too many teams and leagues around the world to talk about each one specifically. Therefore, I highly disagree that this article be deleted from Wikipedia. From my understanding, articles can be in development within Wikipedia and can be added to, so I don't understand where the problem lies. I see that there is a category for baseball under Women's Sports, but there is already an article there called "Women's Baseball". I think that article should be renamed "All-American Girls' Professional Baseball League," because that is what it is specifically talking about. I hope to develop this article to encompass all of women's baseball.

Contributed by User:Shawnimac13.

Misnamed?

Isn't this supposed to be called softball and not baseball because women use a different ball and have a smaller field? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.165.243.53 (talk) 04:29, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh dear

This is a truly awful wikipedia article, written like a train of thought by a well meaning enthusiast. The 'timeline' is particularly horrifying. GavinZac (talk) 06:17, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]