Jump to content

User talk:Tabercil

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Testales (talk | contribs) at 10:38, 30 September 2010 (→‎STOP COVERING UP NIKKI NOVA'S BOY GIRL HARD CORE: comment). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Archive

Archives


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

12 13 14

Stupid mistake

I actually meant to put down that Mercy wasn't renewed for second season, forgot to proofread. My apologies. QuasyBoy (talk) 5:39, 2010 (UTC)

Natasha Yi vandalism

I have already put a website source courtesy of AskMen.com last year and AskMen.com says Natasha Yi was born in 1979. I found vandalism on the Wikipedia article. And I found the IP user has made an incorrect birthyear. The IP user 99.7.171.33 change it's incorrect year of birth to 1981. But 1981 is the incorrect birthyear. Last year, I told the IP user to stop changing the incorrect year of birth. But the IP user 99.7.171.33 not answering me back. So go to Natasha Yi's article to revert it back to it's correct year of birth to 1979 under my username an then write to the IP user 99.7.171.33 not to change incorrect year of birth. If the IP user 99.7.171.33 continues to put the wrong year of birth the IP user will be blocked by editing. Also, could you watch the Natasha Yi artcle and this is to keep track on the correct year of birth that is already sourced. If the IP user continues to edit the wrong birthyear revert it back. Thanks for the alert and talk to me back as soon as possible. Steam5 (talk) 03:38, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

From the edit history of that IP, it looks like he's basically acting like an SPA - the only edit made seems to be changing the year of birth to 1981 or 1983 [1]. I'd say he can be reverted on sight, and warned appropriately. If they edit again, leave a message on their talk page and with luck they'll hit the point where they can be blocked. Tabercil (talk) 03:47, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hello again, the IP user 99.7.171.33 has made vandalism again to it's incorrect year of birth. Could you revert it's correct year of birth that is already sourced and then write a message to IP user 99.7.171.33 and make the IP user to be blocked from editing. The IP user 99.7.171.33 has mad vandalism all the time. Write me back as quickly as possible and make the IP user 99.7.171.33 to be blocked. Thanks. Steam5 (talk) 23:24, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Reverted and warned. As for blocking, I don't see how that'd help. I could block it, but it'd probably wear off before he would go to edit again. (He's editing from an anon IP, and we really frown on permanently blocking them). Tabercil (talk) 23:34, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, once again, I check the edit history on Natasha Yi on September 12 to it's correct year of birth. But 2 days later on the edit history, the same IP user 99.7.171.33 has made vandalism yet again on the incorrect date of birth. The IP user 99.7.171.33 is not responding to you, the IP user 99.7.171.33 continued it's behavior from vandalizing the incorrect year of birth. So revert it again then make the IP user 99.7.171.33 block from editing. Also could you protect the Natasha Yi article so no IP users including the same IP user 99.7.171.33 not to make incorrect year of birth from it's source. I work hard for my edits to Natasha Yi. If you read my new reply write me back as you quickly what I say. Remember to block the IP and protect the article. Thanks for the new alert and reply me back. Steam5 (talk) 19:01, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 20 September 2010

Hi. As you recently commented in the straw poll regarding the ongoing usage and trial of Pending changes, this is to notify you that there is an interim straw poll with regard to keeping the tool switched on or switching it off while improvements are worked on and due for release on November 9, 2010. This new poll is only in regard to this issue and sets no precedent for any future usage. Your input on this issue is greatly appreciated. Off2riorob (talk) 23:50, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 27 September 2010

STOP COVERING UP NIKKI NOVA'S BOY GIRL HARD CORE

You stated in reverting an edit, "Spam - we deal in FACT, not rumour and innuendo. (TW)"

We provided the link to the video! It doesn't get any more factual than that! Nikki Nova did a boy-girl hard core video. Unless this is Nikki or her bff, there is no reason to deny this FACTUAL and WELL REFERENCED EDIT TO TAKE PLACE. —Preceding unsigned comment added by BigFan1 (talkcontribs) 15:59, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The information you are adding states "unreleased hardcore b/g video". (emphasis mine) That means it's not available for public viewing. We have only YOUR word that it is a hardcore video, and that's not good enough. As it stands it is still SPAM. And I have no link to Nikki Nova whatsoever. Tabercil (talk) 22:59, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The update provides a reference with a link to it! Please open your eyes. Do thine own eyes deceive? You errantly refer to her as an "R" rated actress and model when she is a Porn Star. Is WWF wrestling real in your world? :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by BigFan1 (talkcontribs) 06:01, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The existence of the hardcore clip where you found a "trailer" for, is no more than a rumor.[2][3] It may be true or maybe not but Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Furthermore you may consider to sign your comments yourself by appending this ~~~~ to your comments. Testales (talk) 10:38, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]