User talk:Morbidthoughts

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10

This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by .

Cassandra Clare

Hello, there is currently a content dispute at this article and I'd like to see if an agreement can be reached. Since you are a recent contributor to the article, I'd like to ask if you wish to give your opinion on the matter. I'm not involved in the article myself, I'm only interested in trying to bring everyone to a discussion. If you're interested, please comment at this thread, thank you. -- Atama頭 06:13, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Alireza Shahriari

Hi Morbid thoughts, as the person who unsuccessfully proposed in the recent RFC that we ignore Facebook "sources" for sticky prods I'm afraid that I didn't quite get consensus for that change. So I'm afraid Alireza Shahriari doesn't qualify for a sticky prod. Ϣere SpielChequers 08:44, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The 100

Hi

I'm fine with your reversion - I thought for a while before originally reinstating the link, but did, in the end, for the reasons in my edit summary. That's unusual for me, usually I'd be the one removing links. I generally am harsh with ELs, I've removed hundreds, and always consider WP:ELNO.

I ought to point out though, that EL#12 says: Links to open wikis, except those with a substantial history of stability and a substantial number of editors., and if I wanted to argue the point, (which I don't), I'd mention that this wiki has been available since 2006, and has over 1000 registered editors, so I don't think that's particularly clear cut.

As I say, though - not something I feel strongly about - just worth a mention. Begoon^talk 15:12, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I looked at the individual article's history and wasn't comfortable with the number of editors that had worked on it. Mostly written by one guy since its creation in 2009. Morbidthoughts (talk) 15:40, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No problem at all. As I say, I ummed and ah-ed about reinstating it originally, so we have a mini consensus... thanks for the reply... Begoon^talk 11:38, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Eva Angelina

Please see Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard#Eva_Angelina. Everard Proudfoot (talk) 06:41, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Case Keenum

Just wanted to give you a quick heads-up that I reverted your edit on Case Keenum. Believe it or not -- he hasn't decided yet whether or not he wants to return to Houston or leave for the NFL. He tore his ACL, and he could receive a medical redshirt apparently. Here's a link: http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/news/story?id=5626424

Happy editing, Obamafan70 (talk) 02:58, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I understand but he's no longer the starting quarterback for Houston nor can he break the records in the 2010 season. Morbidthoughts (talk) 03:17, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've made the clarification as per your comments. However, I think there is possibly an equivocation between my conceptual understanding of a 'starting QB' and the manner in which you think the term ought to be applied. Obamafan70 (talk) 04:01, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Is that you?

Or is it only coincidence that the interviewer here seems to use the same nickname? Testales (talk) 18:03, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]