User talk:Codf1977
Retired
This user is no longer active on Wikipedia.
Welcome to my talk page, not much point leaving a message here as I won't get it, however you can e-mail.If you do leave a message here please remember to post new comments and topics at the bottom of the page or the section in which you are discussing and sign every post you make here by simply adding four tildes ~~~~ at the end of your message. Codf1977 (talk) | ||||
Not currently semi-retiredIt is misleading to label your user space with {{semi-retired}} while you are still actively editing (AFAICS you have edited most days since 1st Sept, averaging 186 edits/week). I've removed the template for the time being, but of course if you would like to semi-retire (which means "you will be editing occasionally") please restore the template and reduce your participation accordingly. - Pointillist (talk) 00:03, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
Hi Codf1977 - seeing your retirement I thought I'd drop you a note if you're planning on checking your talk page. I'm sorry to see you've retired - if it has something to do with recent on-wiki matters that's a great shame. I think you make great contributions to the project - your work on debating cruft and rugby league notability has been invaluable. I thought I'd let you know that there was one discussion you were in once that I avoided because of a COI - the article in part concerned me personally in an off-wiki capacity. Your actions helped remove content from the project which was a relief to me. People on-wiki are very ready to criticise those who seek the deletion of content and mollycoddle those who create inappropriate content. You should know that your work is greatly appreciated. I was just thinking the other day that you should go for RfA soon. Anyway, I hope that if you decide to stay retired, life treats you well. Cheers --Mkativerata (talk) 19:56, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
19 September 2010 Baghdad bombingsYou tagged this article for reference improvement here[1]. Please justify the tagging, else I may remove them because I do not see any thing unreferenced or badly referenced there. Thanks. - Humaliwalay (talk) 11:41, 20 October 2010 (UTC) |