User talk:Bonadea/Archive 16

Thanks!

Thanks for helping clean up my userpage! Active Banana (^bananaphone 17:54, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

No problem, glad to help! :-) --bonadea contributions talk 18:01, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

Hi

You have deleted the article I have written on HighRadius. The purpose of writing this article is generate an awareness among people about Financial Supply Chain( we don't have a article on FSCM on Wikipedia..thats a surprise!!) This was a attempt to spread knowledge about different SAP FSCM terms like Billers direct , collection management etc.

I would like you to consider this article again and allow it to be posted back.

Thanks You — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shreyansh20 (talk • contribs) 11:12 13 October 2010 (UTC) comment moved here from my user page

Replied on your talk page. --bonadea contributions talk 11:29, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

Editing Andre Geim's page: He is a jewish. His Jewish family was originated from Germany.

Hi, thanks for your notes/edits in Andre Geim's article pages. All correct sources(like: http://www.scientific-computing.com/features/feature.php?feature_id=1, http://www.russia-ic.com/education_science/science/breakthrough/1176/, http://www.forward.com/articles/131944/, and many other non-online references) and right discussions there show that he is completely a Jewish. I am almost a new user and English is my 4th language; I propose that you kindly edit the article as follow: (there is the same text in the Richard Feynman's page)

Andre Geim is from a Jewish family. His family originated from Germany.

By the way, in Geim's article there, should add a main general section named Biography, and then add an under-section named Education, something similar to Richard Feynman's page in the Wikipedia.

Thanks & regards.

P.S. It seems that there are some editors and administrators whose are colluding in the editing there. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Historian.X1 (talk • contribs) 14:53, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Hello, user Historian.X is likely a sock-puppet of user Russian.science who has been blocked indefinitely for sockpuppeteering, unsourced edits, and reverting.

Now it appears he is trying to collude random users (one of whom is you), into affecting an article where legitimate consensus has been reached. Please review the article discussion, and this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Russian.science

before taking any actions. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Therexbanner (talk • contribs) 15:12, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

The appeal to me is presumably based on this single edit where I made the mistake of editing the article to revert what appeared to be removal of sourced information, without looking at the talk page discussion first. Since then, I have read the talk page, and refrained from editing the article. I have no opinion in the matter other than that the ethnicity of a person is almost always unimportant, in particular when the person's life and work are unrelated to his ethnicity (I mean, if it was an article about a Rabbi, his ethnicity might be relevant, but for a scientist, not so much.) I'm not getting involved in the kerfluffle surrounding that article. --bonadea contributions talk 15:48, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Good call, I don't care either, it's all about proper sourcing. --Therexbanner (talk) 18:06, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Retracting my comments but only in half

I do retract my edit summary and apologize Bondadea and 77.23.229.191. I'm not familiar with the book. It needs a credible citation.

I agree, it does need a citation - and I did look it up to verify that it existed before reverting your edit but I really ought to have added a source! The grammar issue is not an issue really - both versions are fine and I wouldn't have reverted your edit if it hadn't been for the book thing. Sorry if I came over a bit strongly. --bonadea contributions talk 20:11, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

made the correct wrong 26/10/2010

hi, i've noticed that when i updated the list of socialnetworkins websites you changed it back to its origional state, i would like to know why you did this when the information i put into wikipedia was correct. bye for now samstar888 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Samstar888 (talk • contribs) 19:15, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

You changed the information in the article to say that Facebook was launched in October 2010, which is clearly incorrect, and that the site is open for people from the age of 14 and older, which is contrary to what the sources say. You also changed the date of publication of a cited newspaper article, to a date in the future to the date on which you read it instead of the date it was published. And those are the reasons I reverted your edits. --bonadea contributions talk 19:46, 26 October 2010 (UTC) I was mistaken about the changed date - it was still changed to the wrong day, but not a date in the future. Blame my bad eyes that couldn't see the difference between "26" and "28". --bonadea contributions talk 12:53, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

Daintyweb

Hide this message To list a page in this category, do not edit this category page. Instead, edit the page you want to list, adding Category:Non-profit organizations based in the Philippines at the bottom. See FAQ/Categorization for details.

The above is as clear as MUD When I am tryimng to add a new orgaisation tHERE IS NO PAGE TO EDIT OTHER THAN THE PAGE WITH THE LIST OF ORGASNISATIONS????? Daintyweb (talk) 08:38, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

Responding on your talk page. --bonadea contributions talk 09:05, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

Woodside School, Ooty

Dear Bonadea Earlier this year I was granted "Reviewer" status for the above site. The status has expired and I now find that the site has been edited yet again by the same person (a past student of the School) who seems determined to add erroneous and possibly libelous information on the site. I have tracked the culprit and written to him advising him that action will be taken if he continues with his actions. However, I am unsure what I can really do to prevent similar postings being made. Can you advise me? NilgirisNilgiris (talk) 15:52, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

This is exactly what i am trying to do hours now. Please have a look in the edit log. Thanks--79.166.144.100 (talk) 13:23, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

Please go to the Piri Reis Talk page Look at his version and my version, read the talk page please, I have explained to this person for hours, but he just keep on insisting on his own version, and deleting all my sources, which I have researched for hours, I tried to explain to him, he only doesnt understand or does not want to understand, please read and see it yourself.--DragonTiger23 (talk) 13:29, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

I have looked at the editing history and at the talk page; unfortunately nothing can change the fact that repeated reverting back and forth is edit warring and may in the end lead to blocking of the accounts involved. You both need to stop reverting immediately (even if the article should for a time be in the "wrong" state while you discuss). I am not weighing in on the subject as such because I know nothing about it, it's only the edit warring that makes me concerned. If you cannot come to an agreement you might try dispute resolution. --bonadea contributions talk 13:32, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

Unfortunately you clearly lying. I've told many times that I didn't deleted your refs, I find your refs irrelevant for what you are trying to use them, but left most of them, check it. But I told I am ready to discuss about it, you are denying 3 hours now to do it. Due to the clemency of Bonadea we still can talk. Please come to the talk page. I will explain AGAIN my points.--79.166.144.100 (talk) 13:41, 30 October 2010 (UTC)