Jump to content

User talk:Bonadea/Archive 4

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5Archive 6→Archive 10

Agnetha Fältskog page

I see you have now removed the 'Stalker' section on this page. Probably for the best if it is continually reverted to tell only one side of the story!

I am concerned about the 'Comeback' section on this page. Most of it contains strap lines from various newspapers and reads like a promotional brochure for the artiste!

Having read the guidelines you kindly referred me to, I noted the insistence for such pages to be a reference point and not a tabloid newspaper format.

I would be grateful for your viewpoint on this.

regards —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ivor Kemp (talk • contribs) 11:14, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

The "Stalker" section was removed by somebody else. I'm not particularly concerned either way, as long as the contents are well-sourced. And as for sources, yes, tabloids aren't really ideal and I avoid using them as sources myself. Perhaps you should start a discussion on the article's talk page, to get people who are more informed about that particular subject to provide their views? --Bonadea (talk) 11:43, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Wikimania 2010 could be coming to Stockholm!

I'm leaving you a note as you may be interested in this opportunity.

People from all six Nordic Wiki-communities (sv, no, nn, fi, da and is) are coordinating a bid for Wikimania 2010 in Stockholm. I'm sending you a message to let you know that this is occurring, and over the next few months we're looking for community support to make sure this happens! See the bid page on meta and if you like such an idea, please sign the "supporters" list at the bottom. Tack (or takk), and have a wonderful day! Mike H. Fierce! 08:42, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

Hi Bonadea! Thanks a lot for your clarifications you've provided. If possible, I'd like to ask your more detailed opinion on the subject. The article I modified speaks about new possibilities that Internet has brought for freelancers. Isn't it good to provide sample links that are exactly on subject? RealDracaena (talk) 08:28, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

Be FAMOUS to appear in Wikipedia

why many bands can be on wikipedia with songs that talk about New Year's Eve and New Year while my band, that's called "New Year's Eve", can't be on Wikipedia??? Aren't we famous enough? it's because of this?! ... I don't think Wikipedia it's really FREE! because "free" is the same of "for everyone"! Our band exists! and it's called New Year's Eve! so we have a place in the history! —Preceding unsigned comment added by PicheNYE (talk • contribs) 19:04, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

Responded on your talk page. --Bonadea (talk) 21:48, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

Boatbookings 01/09/08

Dear Bonadea,

Apologies for putting our site on the wikipedia webpages, I had added it to a few more before receiving your message so please do not block me!! I will review where we add ourselves as an external link, we do actually have useful information on our site regarding chartering yachts and I will make sure that links are to the pages of use and relevance to the Wikipedia entry.

I hope you have a nice day!

) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Boatbookings (talk • contribs) 15:34, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
No problem, and thanks for reading up on the policies. Cheers, --Bonadea (talk) 16:45, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

Wargrave

What gives you the right to think you can correct my entries?? I am very interested to know why you think your knowledge/opinion to be of greater value than mine?? Romly (talk) 17:53, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

My addition to the Wargrave page, although vulger, is true so deserves to be included on the site. The tradition has been going for 15 years, and even though it may not be to your taste the information is factual - so surely this means Wikipedia is a 'snobby' factual encyclopedia as it will not include information not to your taste. What happened to the 'people's encyclopedia'??

Forgot to sign Romly (talk) 18:19, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

Responding on your talk page. --Bonadea (talk) 18:45, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

Friendly note about talk page messages

Hello. As a recent editor at User talk:Pigfriend, I wanted to leave you a friendly reminder that as per WP:USER, editors may remove messages at will from their own talk page. While we may prefer that messages be archived, policy does not prohibit users -including anonymous editors- from deleting comments from their own talk pages. The only talk page messages that may not be removed (as per WP:BLANKING) are declined unblock requests (but only while blocks are still in effect), confirmed sockpuppetry notices, or shared IP header templates (for anonymous editors) ... and these exceptions are just to keep a user from gaming the system. Thanks, Kralizec! (talk) 21:14, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Well, yes, I'm aware of that - but this is a sockpuppet of a blocked user, and since he blanked warnings and kept on vandalising it seemed quite obvious to me that he was removing the warnings to put off a block as long as possible, because when you see a blank talk page you'll normally start with a warning 1 or 2. I'll keep it in mind for the future, though - thanks for the heads-up :-) --Bonadea (talk) 21:21, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

oi

why did u delete my perfectly good edit about MEAT. if you persist in doing so i will ban you myself.

thanks mate. best mate BM. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rasputingangsta (talk • contribs) 16:43, 7 September 2008 (UTC)


hello

i do work for the kiddchris website and we want the wikipedia page to be the way i put it. please leave it alone.

MaDaddy —Preceding unsigned comment added by MaDaddy (talk • contribs) 13:21, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

If you work for the site you should preferrably not edit it at all, and you should in any case not continue to flaunt Wikipedia policies about encyclopedic tone, verifiability and encyclopedic content. --Bonadea (talk) 14:08, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

Help understanding why a page was deleted (Orangmike deleted it :)

Hello! I wrote an article called "Zona Plus" that Orangemike deleted for advertising. It was not my intention to advertise- any references to the product working were from very valid sources. Can you please help me? We were under the impression that our page would be okay based on this article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resperate. I do not know how to re-write it to make it okay. I also wrote him, but your name shows on the history for the page before it was deleted and I was hoping you could help! Healthy4life (talk) 16:54, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

Responded on your talk page. --Bonadea (talk) 17:36, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

Thank you very much for your help! I am working through the guide you suggested and now have a "work-in-progress" article on my talk page. If you ever have a free moment to look at it that would be great. Thank you again, Healthy4life (talk) 19:08, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

Healthy: I moved that from your talkpage to a sandbox, User:Healthy4life/Zona. --Orange Mike | Talk 19:47, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

Allen Bukoff

My edits to the page were not vandalism, mere statements of actual truths. As an art historian and critic I am well aware of who Bukoff A is, and the fact that the original article is indeed a falsified, apparent, publicity stunt. Allen Bukoff (talk) 14:57, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

Inserting derogatory language is always vandalism because it does not conform to Wikipedia's policy of neutral language. Existing, published criticism can and should be mentioned in the article, using neutral language and with verifiable sources. I agree that the current article leaves something to be wished for, in particular it lacks sources, but that is no reason to violate the policy about articles about living persons which really is rather an important Wikipedia rule. Incidentally, I assume that you are not actually the Allen Bukoff in the article, so it would be a good idea to change your user name lest you be suspected of trying to impersonate somebody else. --Bonadea (talk) 15:29, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
Please keep an eye on Fluxus, too. I've reverted similar vandalism there and posted a note on the editor's talk page. David in DC (talk) 16:01, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

Orissa

Stop using this page for your personal vandetta.......This page is not for any scadalous topic....This act started by people like you will only lead to more hatred..... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pandalucky (talk • contribs) 08:57, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

Said by the person who made this edit. You have been asked to adhere to the neutral point of view policy, several times, including two final warnings. Unfortunately, since you keep disregarding the policies, you have now been reported to the Wikipedia administrators for vandalism. --Bonadea (talk) 09:03, 10 September 2008 (UTC)


The use of an existing name as an anonymous front is common and accepted practise in the art world (see Luther Blissett, Sharon Merson etc). The post about Allen Bukoff in retrospect was misguided and not that funny really, I accept that and apologise duly. No malice was intended. I have modified the post in case it is ever read and would like to delete it "myself" eventually. There is now nothing offensive in the post and any subsequent deletion by the wikipolice shall be taken as a personal attack on my freedom of speech ;-) I actually know Allen Bukoff. I also work closely with artists from the Fluxus group of which Allen Bukoff is not part of, nor is he accepted or respected among the said community. The article is in fact quite simply not true. This is fact. Check the literature and catalogues relating to Fluxus 1962-present. The original Allen Bukoff page is in fact a POV.

Allen Bukoff (talk) 10:21, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

Orssa Page Edit

Firstly I appologize if any of the edits from us was vandelism but please note that the edits were made on ground realities in Orissa. Orissa has become a breeding ground for fundamentelists. If you think, whatI have written in a piece of personal vendetta, then why dont you do a google search for "Orissa Violence".

Christians in Orissa have been burnt to death, Nuns who work for orphans are raped and molested , christians are driven out of their homes to the forests where there is no food or shelter, churches are destroyed ----------- AND YOU CALL WHAT I HAVE WRITTEN AS PERSONAL VENDETTA . The violence in Orissa is part of the strategy of : "Hindutva" , an experiment by fundamentelists and fanatics to regain power in Orissa.


Wakeupworld (talk) 05:38, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

Responded on your talk page. --Bonadea (talk) 06:36, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

Apple Bottoms web page

HI, can you explain what about my content is not acceptable, as you keep removing my page. I work for the company, and the current information about the company lacks any informative content. Please explain to me what i specifically must change to be able to leave my listing up. My boss is getting anxious with me as I was meant to have the page up for Wikipedia, and this is my first week here. Please let me know ASAP what content I must omit, in order to be able to successfully post my information.

Thank you for your consideration, DManzor —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dmanzor (talk • contribs) 18:53, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

Please read the information in the notices on your talk page first, including the information that is linked from the notices, because that actually explains a) why an employee of the company should not edit the Wikipedia article about the company, and b) what sort of content, and what register, is relevant for Wikipedia. Sorry to hear that your boss is giving you a hard time, but s/he needs to understand that you can't go against Wikipedia policy. --Bonadea (talk) 19:02, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

Dmanzor (talk) 13:27, 16 September 2008 (UTC)well if i keep getting deleted then let me start by telling you what is incorrect in the current listing so maybe we can work from there. To begin, it lists apple bottoms as a "clothing line", this is inaccurate, as the company sells more then clothing, it should be instead a "fashion and lifestyle brand" because they make apparel, shoes, accessories, glasses, handbags, and childrens clothing. Secondly, the whole part about the rappers who sing about their brand in their songs, should be under pop culture. Also "The name of the brand is derived from a slang term for a woman with large, rounded buttocks" is a negative statement which implies the brand is meant for bigger girls. ... i would like to start by editing the above mentioned tings, in a neutral, tone. so please do not delete my comments. I will justify other issues with the current page before i go ahead and change them.

Thanks


Dmanzor (talk) 15:06, 16 September 2008 (UTC) Hi again, ive gone ahead and made some edits. everything is neutral and cited. Ive left a lot of what was already up there, and mostly just added some factual information. Please contact me if there is something that does not meet your criteria prior to deleitng it, so that i can rather tweak it to your specifications first.

Thank you for your consideration.


Dmanzor (talk) 15:42, 16 September 2008 (UTC) i did a few additional edits, just to fix the citations, as i attached them incorrectly before.

I'm sorry, I was certain I'd responded to this the other day, but obviously I hadn't. Than kyou for reading up on policies and rewriting the page in a more neutral tone! --Bonadea (talk) 15:39, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

Trail of feathers

Hi Bonadea, I suspect that the user who added this to Wikipedia is Tahir Shah himself, or a member of his family (the IP is Moroccan); so it may be alright from the copyright POV, but may raise notability, WP:COI concerns etc. I OR-tagged the article Tahir Shah earlier for similar concerns – there is practically nothing that is sourced. Jayen466 12:53, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

You certainly have a point there. --Bonadea (talk) 15:44, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
I've done a bit of work revising Tahir Shah. Jayen466 21:25, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
... and have left a note on WP:COI/N. Jayen466 09:32, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

UNFAIR Quick to Dismiss

You need to read further before you start a deletion on a new user

what I had posted is not spam but an official MGM Web site. If that is the case that you do this to me then I will contact MGM and have all of MGM related content suggested to be taken off. Check out the web site before you past quick judgement. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gapstargate (talk • contribs) 15:37, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

May I ask you to please read what you are allowed to have on your user page and the definition of spam? Wikipedia isn't a place to promote external websites even if they are completely non-commercial (which MGM isn't ;-) ) and even if the person promoting has no affiliation with the site.
In any case, because you removed the promotional text and link there is no need for the user page to be removed. When an administrator looks at the page, she or he will probably just remove the tags. --Bonadea (talk) 15:44, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

My talk page

Hi, I don't think you meant to restore the vandal edits to my page after I rolled them back. If you did, please explain why. Thanks. Katr67 (talk) 18:58, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

I'm really sorry. It certainly wasn't my meaning - I was trying to rollback the vandalism, and got an error page (which happens quite a lot these days for some reason). I must have rolled back your rollback, but of course I should have checked what happened in the page's history. --Bonadea (talk) 19:01, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
No worries, thanks for trying. And s/he's blocked for now. Yay. Katr67 (talk) 19:09, 25 September 2008 (UTC)


Request for mediation not accepted

A Request for Mediation to which you were are a party was not accepted and has been delisted.
You can find more information on the case subpage, Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Pioneer Courthouse Square.
For the Mediation Committee, WJBscribe (talk) 17:06, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
This message delivered by MediationBot, an automated bot account operated by the Mediation Committee to perform case management.
If you have questions about this bot, please contact the Mediation Committee directly.

Huh. This is the first I hear about the request, but it's not an issue that is appropriate for mediation anyway. --Bonadea (talk) 18:48, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

removal of my link on content management systems.

Excuse me but my link has been on there for ages and has just recently started getting removed. Considering my site is purely cms reviews and a massive cms list i'd love to know how it doesn't apply? In fact, it is far more relevant than the majority of links on this site. I simply changed my domain from cmstester.net to cmscritic.com and was updating accordingly. I've consistently had people telling me how incredibly valuable they have found my site and would ask that you at least examine it before making this decision. In reference to your message below Cmscritic (talk) 18:28, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Content management system do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Bonadea (talk) 18:15, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

I see that you opened a discussion about the link on the article's talk page, which is the best place for it. In general, though, you should avoid adding any external links that you have an affiliation with, to avoid a conflict of interest. Thanks. --Bonadea (talk) 18:45, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

Award

CVU Anti-Vandalism Award
Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user-talk page [1] --Flewis(talk) 11:34, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Thank you! :-D --Bonadea (talk) 11:36, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Hai

hey wtf r u thinkning. Nubhmuffmmer or most commonly called warhammer is a real and true. So please dont block me. Just think what jesus would do?

8=D —Preceding unsigned comment added by Failgasm (talk • contribs) 07:08, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

So maybe you should concentrate on your schoolwork for a bit? --Bonadea (talk) 07:53, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Pioneer Courthouse Square

I reported the latest sock for 3RR, so they should be blocked soon. Aboutmovies (talk) 07:58, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

Excellent. Thanks! --Bonadea (talk) 07:59, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
Just letting you know that technically you qualify for a 3RR block. The other user has been blocked as a vandalism-only account, though. Stifle (talk) 08:22, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
Vandalism reversion can get you blocked for 3RR? I've been told differently in the past. --Bonadea (talk) 08:30, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
Only reverts of simple vandalism (i.e. content addition that anybody visiting the page for the first time would immediately be able to recognize as vandalism) are exempt from 3RR. However, WP:UCS applies too here (-: Stifle (talk) 08:57, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

Sorry

It was late, I was going after this Caplan fellow and one other spammer and didn't notice that you had already worked on it. My bad. Montco (talk) 12:38, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

No problem - I'm just glad to see it wasn't my judgment that was broken :-) Errors happen and are easy to fix. Keep up the excellent work you're doing. --Bonadea (talk) 12:41, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

Offensive article on Raj Thackeray?

If you knew who he was, you would realise that theres no article about him that can be offensive enough. And I am a guy who thinks Hitler was not such a bad guy! Why would I harbour such strong feelings against Raj?

Do you realise who Raj and what he is doin? Mebbe sitting way over in Sweden, and reading articles about him on the net has given you a rosy picture about the positive role he plays... maybe you feel this a nice way to cull some extra Indians out there? So human rights etc applies only to Europeans? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.18.83.173 (talk) 08:19, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

The facts are quite horrendous enough. If you add derogatory language to it it not only breaks Wikipedia policies, but it actually detracts from the man's crimes - people reading it will think "oh, whoever wrote this is on the opposite side of the political spectrum". Look at the article on Harold Shipman, one of the worst serial killers in the history of the world. Look at the article on Adolf Hitler. Do you think the neutral wording in the articles make those people seem any less horrendous? No. Let sourced facts speak for themselves. --Bonadea (talk) 08:25, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
It's not a question of selecting sides. Its simply a case of aggressor and victim and yet you want facts. When even a respected Indian icon like Amithab Bachan is forced to apologise to this Raj guy, do you think that any Indian media (most of whom have major presence here in Mumbai) would want to see their fancy offices get trashed by MNS mobs because they printed an article while the very state and central governments are twiddling their thumbs and hesitating in taking action? You can't always wait for "sourced facts". You can't during a famine or a genocide or violence like this.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.18.83.173 (talk) 08:19, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

Dear Sir,

I am not so sure whether you should remove the external link under "Acceptable quality level" as the link will lead the reader to the AQL table and let them have a better understanding of the AQL figure. Even the table is inside a company website but I do believe that page is very informative for whose who wanna better under what is the AQL figure.

Please reconsider putting the link back to the page.

Thank you very much. —Preceding unsigned comment added by HongKongQC (talk • contribs) 09:17, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

Responding on your talk page. --Bonadea (talk) 09:22, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

Sandeep Sharma is best teacher in ludhiana, Punjab, India

hey my brother, you are requested not to appeal for deletion, Mr. Sandeep Sharma, M.sc B.ed is my respectful Mathematics Teacher, who is very hard worker, seriously i have no words, to describe his personality, i shall be very thankful to u, if u will help me out, i want to give my respected sir, a gift, that to put his information on internet, please i need ur esteem help, at the end, i hope positive from youThanking You

Jatinder Pal Singh —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jatinder pal singh bhikhi (talk • contribs) 14:56, October 30, 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. --Bonadea (talk) 15:29, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

thankyou for ur advise and please help me

i would like you to delete the information about my sir, Sandeep Sharma just from wikipedia, as when i am making search in google, by typing "sandeep sharma ludhiana" below is comingItalic text


Mr. Sandeep Kumar Sharma Ludhian - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia 28 Oct 2008 ... Sandeep Kumar Sharma Ludhiana M.Sc, B.ed. A well known and respectful teacher in Ludhiana and a teacher who in real sense burn himself like ...


But when I open this link, it shows, below writtenItalic text

This page has been deleted. The deletion log for the page is provided below for reference. 

   * 11:27, 30 October 2008 Redvers (Talk | contribs) deleted "Mr. Sandeep Kumar Sharma Ludhian" ‎ (A7 (bio): Doesn't indicate importance or significance of a real person)
   * 17:01, 28 October 2008 DGG (Talk | contribs) deleted "Mr. Sandeep Kumar Sharma Ludhian" ‎ (A7 (bio): Doesn't indicate importance or significance of a real person)

Please delete this information or tell me, how I can delete this information, I shall be very much thankful to you


Thanks brother, for your esteem advise, now please advise me, that how could i add information about My Sandeep sir's, on internet, in another way except wikipdeia, please tell me what to do, hope u understand my feelings for my respected sir. I would like you to visit the website(free web host) which i have made for him www.sandeepsharma.zoomshare.com, please suggest me, i shall be very thankful to you.

Jatinder Pal Singh Bhikhi

waiting ! ! ! !—Preceding unsigned comment added by Jatinder pal singh bhikhi (talk • contribs)

The "information" you refer to can't be deleted as far as I know - it is the removal log for the page you created. The Google search result will disappear in time. --Bonadea (talk) 16:38, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

brother tell me how to add photo/image to a topics

please tell me, how to add photo/image to a topic in wikipedia,

Thankyou —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jatinder pal singh bhikhi (talk • contribs) 09:45, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

Lots of information about thagt here. --Bonadea (talk) 11:40, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

Closure of WP:GEOBOT

Regrettably I have come to inform you, that this bot project will not go into operation and therefore the project will be closing down. Thanks everybody for their time and support but there is a clear reason why it failed. Dr. Blofeld (talk) 11:56, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

Kinobe

I really appreciate the comment at ANI about my article work. You withdrawing your nomination was probably as tough as was for me to rewrite an article which I voted to delete. Given the information that others provided, I just wanted to do the good thing; like you did. I hope you didn't see the closure as anything other than me thinking we were on the same page. I did not intend to offend, and it seems you didn't take it that way. I look forward to seeing you again. Law shoot! 07:08, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

You did good! I was very pleased to see how much the article was improved by your good work. --Bonadea (talk) 09:56, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

Anders Lundkvist

Thanks for the message, I thought I had started it, I guess my comp messed upI4Insomniac (talk) 01:00, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Freebiejeebies

Justify yourself. The article is balanced, objective and notable.

Quality Schools International

A tag has been placed on Quality Schools International, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of Quality Schools International and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Simon2239 (talk • contribs) 09:28, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

Simon2239

That seems to have been pretty farcical. It looks like no block, and a load of removal of the warnings from his/her talk page. Weird or what? Fiddle Faddle (talk) 09:47, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, well. This is sometimes a farcical place :-) I just wish he'd taken the advice to add more references to the article instead of starting to vandalise other articles to prove a point or whatever. I suspect WP:COI, which can lead to problems viewing an article dispassionately. --Bonadea (talk) 09:55, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
Well, the article is not notable, so it must take its chance. A pointless little flurry of stuff. At least the flurry wasn't "advanced" enough to be sock puppetry, probably. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 09:58, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

u mind u'r buisness —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aby94 (talk • contribs) 16:07, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

sorry

hello i am sorry i didnt know there were rules on wikipedia and im new —Preceding unsigned comment added by Themann5465 (talk • contribs)

Bot

hello are you a bot or a real person? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Themann5465 (talk • contribs) 11:29, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

All flesh and blood, me :-) --Bonadea (talk) 12:02, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Bonadea/Archive_4&oldid=1142900399"