Jump to content

User talk:Roughstrikes

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Roughstrikes (talk | contribs) at 15:08, 13 November 2010 (→‎Information - disruption: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome!

Hello, Roughstrikes, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Rich Farmbrough, 14:49, 13 November 2010 (UTC).[reply]

Disruption

You have to be a little more precise - which edits are disruptive and why? have you tried to talk to these editors? Rich Farmbrough, 14:52, 13 November 2010 (UTC).[reply]

For example, do you disagree that his height is 6' 1" ? Rich Farmbrough, 14:54, 13 November 2010 (UTC).[reply]

Information - disruption

sure, will give explanation The user 180.106.5.60, 117.82.98.99 have used senseless edits and peacock terms like extraordinary, Most popular and extremly talented, to spoil the integrity and quality of article and are used excessively to defame and mask some of the facts in the article. some edits are also being done in removing the reflist Tag in the references section.

I request a strong scrutiny and surveillance on this article on the use of Unexplained edits by any IP ADDRESS AND USE OF PEACOCK TERMS. IN THE NEXT DUBIOUS EDIT USING PEACOCK TERMS OR DISRUPTING REFERENCE TAGS, PLEASE UNDO THE EDIT AND SEMI PROTECT THE ARTICLE.

I am not interested in things like Height of the person. What I look for is a semi protection of this article.

And peacock term which try to mislead real facts of the article.

(Roughstrikes (talk) 15:08, 13 November 2010 (UTC)).[reply]