User talk:Goodvac

	; Archives (Index) ;
	2008/July; 2008/August; 2008/September; 2008/October; 2008/December; 2009/January; 2009/July; 2010/January; 2010/February; 2010/March; 2010/April; 2010/May; 2010/June; 2010/July; 2010/August; 2010/September; 2010/October; 2010/November; 2010/December; 2011/January; 2011/February; 2011/March; 2011/April; 2011/May; 2011/June; 2011/July; 2011/September; 2011/October; 2011/November; 2008; 2009; 2010; 2011;

User

Talk

Contribs

Sandbox

Tools

Icons

Thursday

17

October

17:25 UTC

Welcome to Goodvac's talk page

If you post a message on this page, I'll reply on this page.
If I've left you a message on your talk page, I'll watch it, so please reply there.
Please sign your comments by inserting four tildes (~~~~) at the end.
Leave me a message

The Harvard Crimson

The information is well known to all. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.219.239.238 (talk • contribs) 00:19, 12 November 2010

Then you would be able to provide a source that substantiates those claims. Goodvac (talk) 00:20, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You got ...

... that one right. Antandrus (talk) 00:46, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've been keeping an eye on that thread since it opened. At first, as an observer, I assumed good faith, but as the baseless accusations persisted, good faith exhausted. A block was not unforeseeable. Goodvac (talk) 09:56, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for the heads up. Looooooooooooong day. :)--intelati^talk 07:18, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I was just looking around and saw something on which I could shed some light. Goodvac (talk) 07:40, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re. ANI for PsychClone

Actually she has a point - but to get it one must return this toxic half-screen banner. Perched atop an AFD or RFCU the banner, indeed, looks like the kitty menace. Sometimes only socks pronounce the obvious.

Cheers, East of Borschov 10:37, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

With no doubt, PsychClone has some valid points, but the circumstances in which the comments were expressed lead me to believe the user is a sock solely here to disrupt. Goodvac (talk) 10:40, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: User:Expedrium

Hello Goodvac, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of User:Expedrium, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not unambiguously promotional. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:11, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

G11 was not the only reason I had. See this; it was also a copyvio of http://www.elance.com/s/expedrium/. Goodvac (talk) 19:27, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

:(

(

Matthew Edward Hall

if my article is deleted, can you give me some tips to prevent this in the future?