The last two years has seen a seismic shift in the nature of cases that have made it to the Arbitration Committee. Straightforward, disruptive user cases have declined sharply, and in their place rise complicated, complex cases that span multiple topic areas and many many more users then before. During my time on the Committee, I've served as a member of the Audit Subcommittee, and the Ban Appeals Subcommittee, as well as the normal duties of an Arbitrator. I am proud of my service on the Committee this year. This election will be one of unprecedented change to the Arbitration Committee, as approximately two-thirds of the Committee will be elected (or re-elected) this year.I think I have fulfilled the goals I set for my year on the Committee, that I would always try to explain my thought process behind my decisions. whether voting on proposed decisions, or drafting proposed decisions with other arbitrators. The sum of my history is available under this account, as it is the only one I have created and edited with (barring occasional logged out edits with my IP). I ask that you review my work, and then vote accordingly. SirFozzie (talk) 01:13, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
