Jump to content

User talk:Morbidthoughts

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Testales (talk | contribs) at 10:00, 24 November 2010 (→‎Is that you?: r). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Case Keenum

Just wanted to give you a quick heads-up that I reverted your edit on Case Keenum. Believe it or not -- he hasn't decided yet whether or not he wants to return to Houston or leave for the NFL. He tore his ACL, and he could receive a medical redshirt apparently. Here's a link: http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/news/story?id=5626424

Happy editing, Obamafan70 (talk) 02:58, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I understand but he's no longer the starting quarterback for Houston nor can he break the records in the 2010 season. Morbidthoughts (talk) 03:17, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I've made the clarification as per your comments. However, I think there is possibly an equivocation between my conceptual understanding of a 'starting QB' and the manner in which you think the term ought to be applied. Obamafan70 (talk) 04:01, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Is that you?

Or is it only coincidence that the interviewer here seems to use the same nickname? Testales (talk) 18:03, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. That is me. Didn't realise that was just published. Morbidthoughts (talk) 18:46, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oh you working for IAFD and can do interviews?! That's great, next time you can ask her then a few things about her earlier carrier that are not well referenced so far. ;-) So please tell me if you prepare another interview with her. Testales (talk) 19:31, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Next time I see her, I'd rather have several more drinks with her rather than interview her for the purposes of improving the available references about her. Morbidthoughts (talk) 22:47, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Well the interview was for IFAD, not for Wikipedia, wasn't it? At least you are called "staff member" there and seem to do interviews regulary. So I don't see the problem to add like 2-3 questions which may help confirm certain facts if you are already in the lucky position to get such information directly from the source. Testales (talk) 11:51, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It actually would be a waste of time for IAFD and me to produce another interview of Breanne for the purposes of establishing more references over points I wasn't interested in asking the first time. That is the problem. I can be spending that time interviewing another girl, socialising, or taking photographs. Morbidthoughts (talk) 22:05, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I was simply suprised that you work for IAFD and so I was actually just asking if you could drop me a note when you prepare another interview with her in order to possibly verify some bio facts additionally. It's fairly obvious that this will not happen right in the next weeks and I also didn't mean to do such an interview just for Wikipedia. I wonder if my little request was really that ambiguous. Testales (talk) 21:18, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
FYI, I was asked by a friend to meet up with her and Mrs. Benson on Thursday for an interview and photos for another publication. I turned it down. Morbidthoughts (talk) 23:02, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I see, is there a deeper meaning behind this information? Like you could but had no time or just don't see the point maybe because nothing special happenend since the last time? Was the publication intended for IAFD? Btw. Ms. Benson is going to be Penthouse Pet of the month soon, I hope that this is still notable enough for Wikipedia... Testales (talk) 15:46, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
No deeper meaning other than I didn't have time. My friend did go meet her, and there should be an article published in Adult Quest Magazine next month. As for wikipedia notability, being Penthouse Pet is not enough. However, nominations for the 2011 AVN Awards should be released sometime this week so perhaps then. Morbidthoughts (talk) 18:39, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speaking of, I restored Breanne Benson from your userfy talk page. Morbidthoughts (talk) 23:47, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I'd prefer to restrore it by moving it from there to main that's the reason why I have it there with full history. I'll ask tabercil to do so. Moreover she has a second nomination on the list which is more important as it is a scene with fewer actors. Testales (talk) 05:40, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You need to find better sources for her alleged early life. Hustler pictorials are often fictional and are not considered reliable.[1] Some of the other sources you use are blogs and other adult sites of unknown reliability. They can be challenged and removed at any time by a demanding editor. Morbidthoughts (talk) 07:17, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
your link is interessting, especially as it says tht those magazines CAN be basically used as RS, unless the information used is from a pure pictorial. It's different if it is an article accompied with pictures, if I got that right. Just from the pure source given, we can not conclude if it was pictorial or a whole article. Testales (talk) 10:00, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hullaballoo Wolfowitz

...blanks his talk page every time I try to talk to him, even when I'm polite. That's why I gave up on being polite to him ages ago. He also wikistalks me at AFD and votes speedy keep on everything I nominate. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 20:46, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There are better ways to address the alleged wikihounding like WP:AIN and WP:RFC than edit warring on his talk page out of all things. Morbidthoughts (talk) 22:03, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

NFCC violations

Hello, Morbidthoughts. You have new messages at Hullaballoo Wolfowitz's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Breanne Benson, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.backdrop.net/sm-201/index.php?title=Breanne_Benson.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 23:42, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]