Talk:Hague Secret Emissary Affair

Korea Stub‑class Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by one or more inactive working groups.

the Recision sections

The section of Recision is not related to this Affair directly.

Recision

In 1965, these contested treaties were confirmed to be "already null and void" by the Treaty on Basic Relations between Japan and the Republic of Korea.

In 2010, Japan argued that the chronological point of reference for "already null and void" was August 15, 1948, when the government of the Republic of Korea was established; but the Korean analysis of the 1965 declaration construes it as acknowledging the nullification of all treaties and agreements from 1904 onwards, which is consistent with the argument Yi Jun and others attempted to articulate in the Netherlands in 1907.

I think this should be merged to the Eulsa Treaty or/and Treaty on Basic Relations between Japan and the Republic of Korea or other treaties. These contexts are nice to expand the artcles.-210.174.17.173 (talk) 11:09, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]