User talk:Msa1701
Sockpuppetry case
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Msa1701 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. raseaCtalk to me 21:28, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
{{unblock|Your reason here}}
below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. ~ mazca talk 09:03, 26 March 2010 (UTC)Msa1701 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
As per my request i will agree to make NO edits for the next several months to prove that i am being serious about my request to be unblocked by Wiki administrators
Decline reason:
That's not how this usually works. If you're not going to edit there is no point in unblocking you anyway. Seeing as your last incidence of sockpuppetry was fairly recent, I think you should consider the standard offer for blocked users. If you can refrain from socking for several months, that would be a compelling reason to unblock you. Beeblebrox (talk) 16:03, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Regards
msa1701 (talk) 15:52, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
Msa1701 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
As stated i will only use one account from now on - however since i am currently blocked that wont be a problem! I have read the standard offer and agree that it is the best thing for me to do in this situation
Decline reason:
Good to hear. We'll see you in a few months. Best of luck.TNXMan 11:56, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Regards
msa1701 (talk) 11:18, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
UNBLOCKING REQUEST.
Msa1701 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
In an appeal to the Wikipedia administrators: I have not edited for three months now and wish for the adminstrators to review my case. I would only be registered as: msa1701 and no other accounts will be used. I ask please for a fair hearing and if my account is reactivated, i do not have a problem with it being monitored by other administrators making sure that i am folling the Wikipedia guidelines and rules. Thank you msa1701 (talk) 18:18, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I might consider your request favourably if you had only made a small amount of abuse. However, considering the substantial amount of sockpuppetry you practiced, I think the standard offer with its six month waiting period is reasonable. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:42, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Thank you for you considering my request i will wait the remainding time - Does my account automatically reopen after six months or do i make another request?
Regards
msa1701 (talk) 16:10, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
2011 Unblock request
Msa1701 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Have i been blocked for 6 months?
Decline reason:
Your block currently will not expire. You were indefinitely blocked for abusing multiple accounts, and based on the recent activity, I do not see any reason to unblock at this time. Nakon 22:56, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Hello, Will my account automatically unlock this month or does it have to be done by an administrator?
Regards
msa1701 (talk) 21:06, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
Unfair blocking decision made by Wiki Administrator on 3.1.2011?
Msa1701 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2= Will another administrator please review Nakons harsh decision that go the opposite to the other administrators on this page - thank you |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}}
with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1= Will another administrator please review Nakons harsh decision that go the opposite to the other administrators on this page - thank you |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here
with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1= Will another administrator please review Nakons harsh decision that go the opposite to the other administrators on this page - thank you |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
I asked (via the unblock request) have I served my six months suspension or does my account automatically unlock after that time or does an administrator have to do it?
Administrator: Nakon has decided that my suspension is permanent which contradicts the TWO other administrators responses above his decision. They both agreed that a six month blocking was in order and that it could be reviewed after that time.
Please can someone shed some light on this persons decision as it is not the response that i was hoping for and i have nearly served my time.