Wikipedia:Bot policy

One of Wikipedia's rules to consider: avoid using bots.

Wikipedia bots are automatic processes interacting with Wikipedia over the web). Bots could be used to generate articles and others could be used to edit or even destroy articles: see types of bots and history of Wikipedia bots. Well-designed bots can provide concrete benefit to the Wikipedia project. However, because the system was not designed to handle bots, even a good bot has some drawbacks.

Current rules to consider

For the current situation, the burden of proof is on the bot-maker to demonstrate the following:

The bot must be useful
The bot must be harmless
The bot must not be a server hog

Ideally one should check with an administrator before using a bot, or have the bot move slowly enough that errors can be quickly caught and checked by others before damage is done. An administrator may also want to do a database backup before running such a bot.

The bot should also make changes as a logged-in user who can be contacted or even blocked in case of catastrophic failure.

Benefits and drawbacks

Benefits bots can offer

Provides a good template of pre-formatted data for contributors (see how the Newton, Massachusetts entry has been expanded; imagine ith the Periodic Table were used to start the 100+ articles for the elements)
Potentially provides a unique resource not directly available elsewhere on the web (the small-town bot is a good example of a well-designed bot--see Ram-Man's description of the data acquisition process - uck!)
Provides full coverage in cases where an a priori undeterminable subset of the data has a high likelihood of being (or becoming) interesting even though a randomly chosen entry has a low probability of being interesting / useful.

Inherent drawbacks of using bots in current system

Adds tens of thousands of entries to Wikipedia that are unlikely to see a human edit any time soon (in fact, we could probably extrapolate the nearly exact rate at which they will get edited by seeing how many have been edited so far)
Artifically inflates the perceived activity of Wikipedia
Can be perceived as tilting (and possibly could tilt) the purpose of Wikipedia away from being an encyclopedia and towards being a gazetteer / Sports Trivia Reference / etc.
Danger of abuse by "vandal-bots", or just "clueless-bots". A bot running out of control could potentially cause heavy server load or even a denial of service attack.
General complaints about interference with normal contributor operations, esp. Special:RecentChanges.

These pros and cons apply to bot additions in the aggregate--individual bot entries raise issues similar to those of stub entries. In fact, they're often one and the same.

Any graceful solution would provide the automatic functionality of the pros without the negative consequences of the cons.

Currently Running Bots

There are no scheduled or currently running bots registered.

See talk.