Talk:Pillarisation

	Netherlands portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Translation issue

I replaced "school with the bible" with "School met den bijbel" (protestant orientated school) because the reader won't understant the literal translation of "School met den bijbel".--Tomvasseur (talk) 17:34, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Three pillars?

Were there only three pillars? What about the liberals, didn't they form a fourth pillar? The table shows the three pillars and a fourth (general). The corresponding paper, political party and so on are considered liberal, so why aren't the liberals considered a pillar? Please clarify or correct this.

The general pillar wasn't a real pillar as the text reads: "People who were not associated with one of these pillars, mainly middle and upper class latitudinarian Protestants and atheists set up their own pillar: the general pillar. Ties between general organisations were much less strong. The political parties usually associated with this pillar were the liberal VDB and LSP, although these parties opposed pillarisation." The texts also says that there were atleast three pillars. I hope this clarifies. C mon 11:14, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The third pillar is the anti-clerical pillar. Intangible 12:17, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Is this system comparable to the dhimmi system historically especially in Spain? Just wondering. Jztinfinity 22:55, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As I understand it, Jews lived in the Netherlands in the 19th century. Where did they fit into the pillarisation system? Did the Jews form their own pillar? 68.32.48.221 (talk) 05:48, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

According to the article on Dutch Jews, "Dutch Jews were staunch supporters of the Dutch monarchy until the late 19th century. Most Jews became socialists during the early 20th century and were fully integrated into the socialist pillar before the Holocaust." (Hmmmmm. So that would group Jews together with liberal Protestants and atheists?) 68.32.48.221 (talk) 05:51, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Morris dancing?

Really? Tozznok 19:32, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unique?

I was wondering how unique the "Verzuiling" is in world history. To be honest: I was quite surprised that this is only addressed as a Dutch/Belgian phenomenon. Are there similar systems that are hidden away in Wikipedia under a different name? --Looskuh 21:24, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The article states: "Austrian, Israeli and Maltese societies were other examples of this phenomenon." So there is more, however the Dutch were and Belgians are quite extreme in this phenomenon. C mon 23:53, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Don't forget that Northern Ireland has a sort of “pillarise” society, with Catholics, Protestants & none-religious voting different parties, reading different newspapers, going to different schools etc. Even French and German Wikipedia has seen this.

	Protestant/Unionist	Catholic/Nationalist	Neutral/None-Religious
Political Parties	UUP; DUP; PUP	SDLP; Sínn Féin	Alliance
Newspapers	The Belfast Telegraph; The News Letter; British newspapers	The Irish News; Irish newspapers	Newspapers in general
Schools	State schooling	Catholic schools	State schooling
Sports (examples)	Football	Gaelic football: hurling;	Football

159753 15:14, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The concept may not be unique, but the terminology used may be 85.159.97.5 (talk) 09:35, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see the problem, the article recognizes this! C mon (talk) 11:06, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Remnants

I think the primary and secondary school systems are also a leftover. Not directly, as in that they promote a certain pillar, but more that e.g. the organisation and ownership of non-public schools are still heavily tied to the Bishopric's in the South. This while strangely enough, the Catholic Pillar dissolved the strongest, with over 90% of the children on Catholic schools not having parents that are Catholic in more than name or not at all. 88.159.74.100 13:09, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lack of References

"Pillarization" is discussed by Arend Lijphart. If I find time I'll get some references from his publications. 166.137.136.213 (talk) 22:09, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Grammar etc

Whole sections are not understandable as the writer's first language is not English. Rewrite required.--User:Brenont (talk) 03:55, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

seeming contradiction

"while more latitudinarian Protestants and atheists were pillarless"

vs.

"People who were not associated with one of these pillars, mainly middle and upper class latitudinarian Protestants and atheists set up their own pillar: the general pillar."

Now I am confused... Anybody can help us out here? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bazuz (talk • contribs) 22:36, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Austria part problematic

-POV (pro FPÖ/anti corporatist) even offtopic "young Dynmaic leader of the FPÖ"... -the instiution by pillar parts asignment of instution looks questionable. For example theres some weird University for Freud fans just founded in 2005 asigned to the SPÖ side... -Grammar could also be improved 84.56.74.115 (talk) 11:57, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]