User talk:Floquenbeam
Appearance
SEMI-RETIRED
I'm still around, but my participation here has reduced so much that this is still a better description than "busy".
|
|
Middle Men
It seems like the same guy is still vandalising the article. As you dealt with the previous case I'm bring it to your attention, and I hope you will semi protect the article again for a longer time. I don't particularly want to have to go through the process again and again.
If his claims have any merit at all he is understandbly angry and no reasonable explanation is likely to stop him from continuing to deface the artice. -- Horkana (talk) 18:55, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
- Looks like he's been at it since November, so I've protected it for 3 months. If autoconfirmed accounts start showing up, let me know. --Floquenbeam (talk) 13:00, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 21 February 2011
- News and notes: Gender gap and sexual images; India consultant; brief news
- In the news: Egyptian revolution and Wikimania 2008; Jimmy Wales' move to the UK, Africa and systemic bias; brief news
- WikiProject report: More than numbers: WikiProject Mathematics
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Longevity and Shakespeare cases close; what do these decisions tell us?
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 17:39, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 28 February 2011
- News and notes: Newbies vs. patrollers; Indian statistics; brief news
- Arbitration statistics: Arbitration Committee hearing fewer cases; longer decision times
- WikiProject report: In Tune with WikiProject Classical Music
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: AUSC applications open; interim desysopping; two pending cases
- Technology report: HTML5 adopted but soon reverted; brief news
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 00:59, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
No consensus for removal
See the Wikiquette alerts, I reviewed it after B's demands and it is clear the interpretation is certainly not consensus. WMO Please leave me a wb if you reply 05:10, 1 March 2011 (UTC)