User talk:Friendly neighbour

Space for your comments

Feel free to comment even (or especially) if you are Jeff Merkey, Gadugi or Waya sahoni (or even all three at the same time). Friendly neighbour 17:32, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Another Account to Block

I really think the admins are going to react to this account in the same way as they did to your previous one. You shouldn't create an account solely for the purpose of stalking another user, even a user who is violating their ban. — MediaMangler 17:50, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This account is not meant to stalk anyone but to focus the attention of the admins on blatant violations of a user ban. BTW, this account has not yet touched any page owned by any incarnation of Jeff Merkey. I only announced the change of my account because of the banned name on a page where User:Waya sahoni wanted me banned because of exposing him as banned User:Gadugi. Is it really stalking? BTW, I announced it on one talk page and in a few minutes I have you on my back. Congratulations on fast work. Now maybe you'll concentrate on users banned because of what they wrote, not because of the name they used. Or maybe not. I can dream, can't I? Friendly neighbour 18:04, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Chill! You will find my account listed on User:Waya sahoni. I didn't get there by ignoring his behavior. As for my "fast work", if you check the talk page at your old account, you will see that it was actually slow work. I happened to be editing a comment for your talk page almost simultaneously with your block. Only after I saved that edit did I see your announcement on a page that I have on my watchlist. — MediaMangler 18:13, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Could you give me your definition of stalking? I'm not aware of any that I did. Please check my history under both account names User:Sue me Jeff and User:Friendly neighbour. Except of the first user name (stupid I admit) chosen very quickly and impossible to change later (as far as I know), I did not break knowingly any Wikipedia rules. Adding a warning against a suspected socket puppet (taken from the Wikipedia pages and meant to be used on the suspected user's page!) can't be against the rules, can it? I would prefer to know your opinion before I try to revert the warning on Waya sahoni's page. If I am not allowed to do so, who can and whom can I ask person to do something against blatant violations of Wikipedia rules. Friendly neighbour 18:21, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The definition used by the admins is what should concern you, not mine. I'm pretty much a newbie here myself. Merkey has claimed that my own user page indicates that I'm stalking him. I certainly don't think that is true and I hope the admins agree. I've been involved in fighting other vandals besides Merkey. — MediaMangler 18:42, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

So you basically say that you have no idea why you had inserted a cection named "Another Account to Block" to my talk page? OK, thank you very much for your effort. Friendly neighbour 18:49, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]